V
vern_humphrey
Guest
Please explain how Original Intent somehow makes the unborn child NOT human?Ahh, so we are NOT using original intent but adjusting our reading to include new knowledge.
Please explain how Original Intent somehow makes the unborn child NOT human?Ahh, so we are NOT using original intent but adjusting our reading to include new knowledge.
Wrong – in the scenario I painted, the drunk realizes that he will be in trouble if he stays around. He knows right from wrong, and is capable of assessing the situation and making a decision.If a drunk runs over the child the chruch does not consider it a moral sin, because the decision to drive and leave the scene was made when he was not able to act with full consent of his will to being drunk. Great analogy there!
Well, abortion was not illegal at the time of the Constitution and the law did not recognize the unborn as persons in a vareity of ways.Please explain how Original Intent somehow makes the unborn child NOT human?
And next, no doubt, you’ll be expecting us to believe that the Catholic Church didn’t oppose abortion until 1870 (or some such date.)Well, abortion was not illegal at the time of the Constitution and the law did not recognize the unborn as persons in a vareity of ways.
I think it was another poster here who pointed out that it is modern medical technology that has brought us to understand the personhood of the unborn.
How do you know this? Are you saying that there were no states or local laws against abortion?Well, abortion was not illegal at the time of the Constitution and the law did not recognize the unborn as persons in a vareity of ways.
She doesn’t need proof – it’s an article of faith among the pro-abortion crowd. Just like the claim that “The Catholic Church never condemned abortion before 1870” (or some such date.)How do you know this? Are you saying that there were no states or local laws against abortion?
I am saying that and if you have contrary evidence, I would be interested in learning of it.How do you know this? Are you saying that there were no states or local laws against abortion?
Katherine, dear, you are the one making the original assertion. The burden of proof is on YOU.I am saying that and if you have contrary evidence, I would be interested in learning of it.
I have never understood how or why one would claim to be Catholic, and then go to such great lengths to avoid following the teachings of the Church.The day is comming for each one of us when we will stand before THE Judge and give an account of all our “thoughts, words and deeds”, I wonder how far convolted arguments and legalisms will get us then. My guess it will get us FAR-FAR-FAR away from HIM.
I don’t understand how Catholics can delude themselves into thinking abortion is anything other than what it is – the grisly, premeditated serial killing of the most innocent.Well, you know choice is cool. I don’t think I would ever kill someone but it’s okay for someone else to do it if it’s their choice. I guess even though I don’t steal, it’s okay for someone else to do it if they think it’s okay as long as it doesn’t affect me.
AHHHHHHHHHHH WAKE UP! Abortion is trluy a sinful, selfish and cruel act. The abortion debate was politicized by the left as another anti-catholic smear. If women and especially minority women would wake up and realize that The “mother” of planned Parenthood Margaret Sanger was a racist, anti-catholic they would realize how badly they have been deceived.