Is being Sexologist okay?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Question
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well I would oppose that endeavor in a MAJOR way.

But couldn’t you be a sexologist who tried to introduce ideas into the field against the transgender phenomena? You don’t need to succumb to the ideas or agree with them to study them or teach about them.

You don’t need to be a Nazi to be a professional who knows everything there is to know about Nazism and teach people about Nazism.
 
I have given you the truth over and over. I was an insider on this, I have been trained, I am not looking from the outside in. But enough. It is is dangerous to recommend to someone such things from your armchair.

You just do not get it, and apparently never will.
 
Last edited:
Can you work as a nurse? Maybe, but you better be prepared to talk of homosexual unions as if they are on par with God’s plan for men and women. You better advocate for birth control, and be okay with attending an abortion if no one else can, even if it goes against your beliefs.
You might find it interesting that there are associations of Catholic health care practitioners as well as associations of Pro-Life Nurses, Doctors, Med Students, etc.

In the United States there are Conscience Protection Clauses in many states.

There is a chart here (put together by Planned Parenthood, who BTW oppose conscience protectin laws)

https://www.guttmacher.org/print/state-policy/explore/refusing-provide-health-services

 
I am aware of such organizations. However in Canada, conscience rights for medical personnel have already been eroded in Saskatchewan and Ontario. If you don’t want to participate in an abortion or assisted-suicide, you have to provide an “effective” referral, which essentially makes you morally complicit.

Even if these rights exist in the States, it doesn’t mean there aren’t opponents working to override them.

Even being a lawyer is getting harder and there have been court challenges by people who studied in Christian colleges with rules against premarital sex etc. who want to be admitted to the bar, and weren’t permitted to be.

The question is do you stay and fight or dash?
 
Any religion which is at a cognitive dissonance with fact is no religion I wish to be a part of.
The issue is there may be practices that are accepted as part of sexology that are nonetheless immoral. There can be things that are believed to be helpful (or even might actually be helpful towards a certain goal) that are nonetheless against Catholic morality. That said, the final goal is a healthy sexuality - that just has to be accomplished while respecting morality.
 
I disagree. Morality is outside of her domain as a sexologist. An example, condoms prevent the spread of STD’s. They do. That is fact. Her personal feelings about contraception need not enter the conversation.
Morality isn’t outside of anyone’s domain ever.

That said, I think her best bet would just be to be honest. I think there is a market for people who want help from someone who understands and supports their own views. Be upfront that she’s providing a service aimed at those people and from a certain perspective.
 
Any religion which is at a cognitive dissonance with fact is no religion I wish to be a part of.
That is a valid choice just as choosing not to be in a profession that creates a cognitive dissonance is a valid choice.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top