Absolutely.Working out is one thing -competing, I just don’t see how one could be modest and compete.
After that 20K run that most people simply could not do, pride is sure to follow.
Absolutely.Working out is one thing -competing, I just don’t see how one could be modest and compete.
Good question.I guess in order to answer this question I would have to ask a question: I hear a lot of people talking about vanity all the time, but I’ve never really heard a proper definition for it. What IS the difference between wanting to be buff for a sense of self-satisfaction or for vanity, exactly?
An athlete competes. One might have a problem with something a biker wears, biking shorts tight biking shirt may not seem modest. How about a swimmer? To most swim suits are not modest. A volleyball player, short shorts, not very modest. A runner, tight shorts.I have an old classmate on Facebook (a woman) who is now a body builder and competes -and posts all her body building pics online. They wear a minimal amount of clothes -as in itsy bitsy bikini and high heels.
Funny thing is she commented on a pic I had of a group of us in junior high school, about how in embarrassing the picture was and how dorky we all looked -which, by the way wasn’t even true. We were just average 14/15 year old kids -its kind of an awkward age -braces and whatnot but normal. I’m thinking how backward is it that she embarrassed by a picture where I think she actually looks very pretty and not by the dozens she posts which leaves very little to the imagination -and to me look rather sleazy.
Working out is one thing -competing, I just don’t see how one could be modest and compete.
Well competitions are a goal an athlete may have set for themself. I don’t know very many bikers or runners who train all year long to skip the competition. It is an end to measure your goal. So I guess I would never see bodybuilding in any different light than I would see a biker or runner.Good question.
I would say that a sense of self-satisfaction is sorta kept within one’s self…like…yeah, I set a goal of having 18" biceps and I worked very hard to do so and I’m happy that I reached my goal.
Vanity, on the other hand, would be to me something like, Look at my !8" biceps, everyone! Aren’t you impressed?
I guess too that there’s a difference in bodybuilding for competition and bodybuilding for the sake of having a fit body. Sort of like the difference in competing just for the judges or playing to the crowd. Perhaps a subtle difference? Or maybe no difference at all?
I’m not trying to say it is intrinsically evil, and I’m really only talking about pro-bodybuilding here anyway. There’s a huge difference between a lot of normal looking bulk, and the double-bicep vein popping look of pro bodybuilders. There’s a problem with pushing your body beyond normal limits simple for looks, and that’s what bodybuilders do. Athletes train for the performance. Bodybuilders train for the looks. It’s not practical application.But the actual Body Building part (off season) is not unhealthy, and an opportunity for penance. In fact that is when they are most health conscious. The judging part is a little hard because they must lose as much fat as possible while maintaining muscle, so they starve themselves and eat very little (an opportunity for fasting and penance), much like a boxer who starves himself to make weight.
It’s ok if you don’t see it as a legitimate sport. But I will have to disagree with you when calling it intrinsically evil. Look at the opportunity for penance and fasting that these people can do everyday. Surely they can save many from souls by training their bodies and offering their sore, achy and tiring bodies as penance.
I can’t think of any competition of the Olympics in which the attire is “modest”. Perhaps the issue is with the viewer and not the competitor? The human body is not sinful or dirty. We weren’t born with clothes on. There is a difference between dancing on a pole with the sole goal to get a “rise” out of the viewer, and a figure skater, swimmer, body builder.An athlete competes. One might have a problem with something a biker wears, biking shorts tight biking shirt may not seem modest. How about a swimmer? To most swim suits are not modest. A volleyball player, short shorts, not very modest. A runner, tight shorts.
I think by most peoples defination any faithfull Catholic or even any Christian in general should never participate in sports, because most sport attire is just not modest.
as stated before bb is a sport just as biking and running is a sport.I’m not trying to say it is intrinsically evil, and I’m really only talking about pro-bodybuilding here anyway. There’s a huge difference between a lot of normal looking bulk, and the double-bicep vein popping look of pro bodybuilders. There’s a problem with pushing your body beyond normal limits simple for looks, and that’s what bodybuilders do. Athletes train for the performance. Bodybuilders train for the looks. It’s not practical application.
Working out to gain bulk and strength with moderation in mind is always a good thing, as training our bodies to be stronger and better is good for us, and can enable us to live longer, and be there when people need us.
Modesty is also still an important consideration. Go look up some pictures of bodybuilding competitions, and you will see speedos and bikinis in nearly every single picture. This is not modest.
IMO beauty contests cannot be called good under any circumstances because they make into a competition what God has naturally given us. Sports competitions are fine because the contestants win or lose based on ability. If you lose a sports competition, you train harder, if you lose a beauty contest, do you get prettier?![]()
exactly!I can’t think of any competition of the Olympics in which the attire is “modest”. Perhaps the issue is with the viewer and not the competitor? The human body is not sinful or dirty. We weren’t born with clothes on. There is a difference between dancing on a pole with the sole goal to get a “rise” out of the viewer, and a figure skater, swimmer, body builder.
No, bodybuilding is not sinful, it’s a sport like any other. I can get sinful if one starts to abuse their body with chemicals, etc. But the sport itself is not sinful. I have yet to see a Church document that forbids Catholics from participating in sporting competitions. I have yet to read about a “scantily clad” figure skater, body builder, runner, swimmer, or any other athelete rebuked by the Church for being “immodest”.
well that goes with any sport. It is cheating yourself and any of fellow athletes.I am surprised that nobody has mentioned steroids. Is injecting your body full of artificial and potentially dangerous chemicals really how a Catholic is supposed to treat his body? That would concern me more than the outfits and the vanity.
Other sports ban steroids, test for them, and don’t encourage using them. You aren’t going to compete as a bodybuilder without steroids.well that goes with any sport. It is cheating yourself and any of fellow athletes.
that simply is not true. There are many who compete in bb who do not use steroids.Other sports ban steroids, test for them, and don’t encourage using them. You aren’t going to compete as a bodybuilder without steroids.
It’s a contest based primarily on the looks of the person involved. How can you consider that a good thing? Losing because you are not as fast or as strong as somebody else is totally different from losing because you are subjectively not as good looking.as stated before bb is a sport just as biking and running is a sport.
on modestly look up any picture of a biker and you will see speedo shorts, the same with swimming and any sport of speed.
Beauty contest are not just about beauty, there is a lot behind the scenes that the audiance does not see. There is composer, physical fitness, the ability to speak in public. If a contest loses she will normally go back and retrain in these areas.
I’ve never seen the Church rebuke anyone for immodesty. How is that an argument? If it’s immodest for girls to walk around on a beach with skimpy bikinis, how is it different when they are competing?I can’t think of any competition of the Olympics in which the attire is “modest”. Perhaps the issue is with the viewer and not the competitor? The human body is not sinful or dirty. We weren’t born with clothes on. There is a difference between dancing on a pole with the sole goal to get a “rise” out of the viewer, and a figure skater, swimmer, body builder.
No, bodybuilding is not sinful, it’s a sport like any other. I can get sinful if one starts to abuse their body with chemicals, etc. But the sport itself is not sinful. I have yet to see a Church document that forbids Catholics from participating in sporting competitions. I have yet to read about a “scantily clad” figure skater, body builder, runner, swimmer, or any other athelete rebuked by the Church for being “immodest”.
There are some but the majority do use steroids. However, you aren’t going to go and compete in the IFBB against “pros” without steroids. If you want to win as opposed to just compete in bb you have to use. That is the whole reason that they have organizations for natural bodybuilders who don’t want to use any drugs.that simply is not true. There are many who compete in bb who do not use steroids.
First of all, yes the Church has rebuked people for immodesty and gave clothing guidelines. The Pope just issued guidelines for dressing when being present at Peter’s Square. Yes, it is a valid arguement. If it was against the rules of the Church to participate in sports and to dress appropriately for those sports the Church would not be shy about saying so.I’ve never seen the Church rebuke anyone for immodesty. How is that an argument? If it’s immodest for girls to walk around on a beach with skimpy bikinis, how is it different when they are competing?
well just as all baseball players are not pros, not all bb are pros. That doesn’t make them any less in their prospective sports.There are some but the majority do use steroids. However, you aren’t going to go and compete in the IFBB against “pros” without steroids. If you want to win as opposed to just compete in bb you have to use. That is the whole reason that they have organizations for natural bodybuilders who don’t want to use any drugs.
At what point do you draw the line? When does “appropriate sports dress” become immodest clothing and inappropriate? Or is anything allowable?First of all, yes the Church has rebuked people for immodesty and gave clothing guidelines. The Pope just issued guidelines for dressing when being present at Peter’s Square. Yes, it is a valid arguement. If it was against the rules of the Church to participate in sports and to dress appropriately for those sports the Church would not be shy about saying so.
Second of all, if a person (not saying specifically you) can’t tell the difference between someone wearing a skimpy bikini on a beach and someone competing at the Olympics, then with all due respect, maybe those don’t have the maturity to watch or be there at all. So perhaps, no offense intended, it may be in one’s best interest and that of one’s immortal soul, to not watch the Olympics or any other sport for their own good, lest they fall into sin.
The Church does not frown upon body building, the Olympics or any other sport.
Appropriate sports attire is appropriate for the sports arena where the goal is to showcase the athlete and his/her accomplishments. Appropriate sports attire becomes immodest clothing when it is not in the sports arena and the goat is to showcase sex.At what point do you draw the line? When does “appropriate sports dress” become immodest clothing and inappropriate? Or is anything allowable?