Well, it’s not just a quote from some random person. It’s a quote from one of the leading and most prominent bodybuilders of his time, the late Mike Mentzer, which is more than sufficient evidence to make my point.
Argument from authority fallacy. I am sure you can see that here. The above, then, is null and void.
Here is what Dr. Alan Klein, Sociologist at Northeastern University, has to say about homosexuality in the bodybuilding industry, in his article,
“Pumping Irony: Crisis and Contradiction in Bodybuilding”:
“Ironically, the selling of sexual favors to gay men is widespread in Southern Califarnia bodybuilding. Estimates of the activities range from 40% to 75% depending on who is queried., It is called “hustling” by people at the gym, but it only involves the male members of the community. Hustling is a range of transactions involving a bodybuilder and a gay male. Only on rare occasions is a woman the procurer of sexual favors. The act of hustling may entail selling one’s time for “beefcake” photographs, or nude dancing at all-male events, but primarily it involves sexual acts. The latter might be passive or active, depending on one’s conscience.”
Interesting. However, one can start to pick apart this statement and see through the poor generalizations. Estimates range difference of 35% represents a significant number that clearly shows just how off these estimates themselves could be. Furthermore, “depending on who is queried” is a very nicely put euphimism that I am sure you are able to see through. What strikes me as most interesting however is the selective information and the defective induction that resluts. So, men are asking other men to do sexual things for them? Big surprise. That happens just about anywhere you go. Not only that, but the above leads you to believe that bodybuilders follow through with the requests when in fact they may not. Finally, it seems that anecdotal and general evidence is being used as a basis for big claims.
"People don 't realize that in any given lineup of 20 competitors 10 are hustling **Argument based on speculation… holds no weight. **. We have always had gays in the gym… I learned from _____who was hustling, that all the guys were doing it and that really opened my eyes **Obviously this is just poor research now. All the guys are doing it now? I thought it was 50%? Poor research and speculation. **. But now there is such a heavy gay concentration in the gym.
Hardly anyone is spared, allowing the novice to feel that hustling is a rite of passage rather than a deviant act." **Again, where men are in big numbers and have good bodies - why wouldn’t there be homosexuals there? But the conclusion then that homosexuality is a part of bodybuilding is flawed. See above. Just because someone approaches these guys with offers does not make it anything more than an offer. **
You won’t have to look too far to find the demonic and Satanic elements within the music industry. Bombarding oneself with this kind of music for 2-3 hours per day is not a good thing.
Out of all your arguments I find this to be the one that I don’t think anybody can take seriously. You are trying to link music with bodybuilding and it just makes no sense. Nevermind the fact that the “demonic” music point can be debated.
Steroid use is rampant in professional bodybuilding circles. It’s been that way for decades.
Yes, in some professional cicles this is true. Not in all. There are many bodybuilding federations, a lot of which require regular and frequent testing. However, my point still stands. You do not understand what the word normative means. Steroid use is not a normative part of bodybuilding.
These studies, if they do exist, runs contrary to traditional medical opinions on the dangers associated with steroid abuse.
You are confused, but correct in some sense. You are associating bodybuilding with anabolic ABUSE. This is contrary to what steroid users in fact do. Abuse of anything has negative effects, so yes, medical opinions on abuse will be negative, expectedly so. But why do you automatically assume bodybuilders abuse anabolics? The fact is that most do not. For a great article that has relevant studies, look here
steroid.com/side.php