Is Catholic Radio at risk from Fairness Doctrine

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cider
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Cider

Guest
‘Death Knell for Catholic Radio’
Fairness Doctrine and ‘Localism’ Worry Catholic Radio Stations

WASHINGTON — The debate over the possible renewal of the Fairness Doctrine has generally pitted liberal lawmakers against popular conservative talk show hosts.

But small media outlets such as Catholic radio stations may stand to lose the most if Federal Communications Commission regulators step back into the arena.

With fragile budgets and small staffs, Catholic radio stations would be hard pressed to meet the Fairness Doctrine’s requirement to air opposing views on controversial issues or provide the range of programming that local review boards may demand.
These additional regulations would “be the death knell for Catholic radio,” said Stephen Gajdosik, president of the Catholic Radio Association, a trade association with some 200 member stations and programs throughout the nation.
“If I had to predict, I would say that the actual Fairness Doctrine will not be passed,” he said, “but the same effect may be accomplished through an FCC administrative rule called ‘localism.’ This gives a local review board oversight to decide whether a station’s content serves the needs and interests of the local population.”

Yet, the Church teachings that Catholic stations help disseminate are not open to debate or popular opinion, even if they are not widely accepted, Gajdosik pointed out.

“What if a local board does not agree with the Church and sees no value in having a radio station sending that message?” he asked.

The Fairness Doctrine was adopted by the FCC in a 1949 rule that required broadcasters using public bandwidth to air discussions “of conflicting views of public importance.” Cable and satellite stations are not affected. The rule was revoked in 1987 under the Reagan administration, but there have been periodic moves by lawmakers to restore it.
 
People listen to Catholic radio or conservative talk radio because the viewpoints are what they want to hear. And they want it for free, just like broadcast TV. If scrutiny is to be brought to bear on Catholic or conservative radio, then it must be applied to broadcast TV to ensure unbiased coverage, and to prevent media moguls propagandizing on free airwaves, especially during election coverage.

A liberal radio program or any other religious denominations program can find its place on radio if it is commercially viable because it brings in listeners or simply funded by whoever is willing to foot the bill. Why do we need government to interfere in the radio trade?

If you want to apply that principle, why not make newspapers like the New York Times be subject to scrutiny in their articles to ensure an unbiased viewpoint?

The Fairness Doctrine and localism scares me.
 
I’m all for greater localism. And, really, it shouldn’t hurt small stations which just syndicate much. Perhaps, if you had to hire a morning host five days a week. But, more likely, you’ll just have to make sure to have local content. What’s the problem with that? They don’t even necessarily have to be paid. Do some shows highlighting concerns of the local Church. Have an hour a week discussing the high school sports in the area. Relevant Radio essentially already does this by working with dioceses in which their stations air programming. They give the diocese an hour a day. In Chicago many of the hosts of diocesan shows are horrendous and know absolutely nothing about radio or entertainment. But there they are. Localism accomplished. And it does satisfy a need, even if it isn’t done especially well. Not an issue anymore.
 
Dude. You are aware that the Fairness doctrine has not been in place for 30 years?
 
Does this have anything to do with Report on Broadcast Localism
and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
?

I just got a letter from my local network (Immaculate Heart) saying that this would
• Require that a main studio be located within a broadcaster’s community of license.
• Require that someone be at the main studio during all times of operation.
• Establish minimum levels of locally-originated programming for stations.
• Establish permanent local Advisory Boards – or other compelled audience
surveys, or town hall meetings – to determine the program content of stations.
Being in the liberal SF Bay Area, that “Advisory Board” has me worried. Too much of our local area is run “by consensus”.
 
Dude. You are aware that the Fairness doctrine has not been in place for 30 years?
Did you not even read the story?

**The debate over the possible renewal **of the Fairness Doctrine has generally pitted liberal lawmakers against popular conservative talk show hosts.
 
That sort of thing has failed so many times, saying that liberals will re-instate the Fairness Doctrine is just… Just fail.
 
Does this have anything to do with Report on Broadcast Localism
and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
?

I just got a letter from my local network (Immaculate Heart) saying that this would

Being in the liberal SF Bay Area, that “Advisory Board” has me worried. Too much of our local area is run “by consensus”.
Good question, I don’t know the answer to.
 
Here is some more on the Report on Broadcast Localism and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that I mentioned before. This is from a law firm, not the FCC. A google of the FCC site came up with a link to a “page not found” and I could only see the cached file from last April.

The comments of the law firm are here: dwt.com/practc/broadcast/bulletins/02-08_LocalismReport.htm

The google cached page is here:
209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:1ClgxqtF5jkJ:www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2008/db0424/DA-08-940A1.txt+%22Report+on+Broadcast+Localism%22+site:fcc.gov&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us&client=firefox-a

I thought this might be worth discussing along with the Fairness Doctrine (if anyone is interested) even if they are not the same thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top