Is Church Militant Schismatic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1Tim4-12
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
1

1Tim4-12

Guest
Hi everyone! I’m a college student at a Catholic college. But the college I go to is not always trustworthy. A Catholic professor of mine told me that Church Militant media is schismatic. I don’t like them and don’t follow them anyway (I used to but I got sick of all the anger). I just wanted to know if they are schismatic or if they’re okay to watch?
 
All I know is that when they were named Real Catholic Radio, the Bishop of the dioceses they were located in, ordered them to stop using the word “Catholic,” in their title, as they did not speak for the Catholic Church and were often wrong.
 
Last edited:
I don’t know if they’re schismatic, but I’m very glad I made the decision to stop watching them.
 
Have you heard them say something that qualified as schismatic?
 
Ask the Bishop who told Michael Voris to stop using the word, “Catholic” in their title.

Like I posted, it’s all I know about them as I never listened to them for more than a minute
 
I’d say that the person who is not well grounded in the Faith might be pushed toward schismatic groups from a diet of Church Militant/LifeSite News.
 
STATEMENT OF BISHOP MICHAEL HOEPPNER RE: “ROMAN CATHOLIC REVIVAL”
EVENT


Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia and other bishops share my opinion. Archbishop Chaput has been quoted as saying Church Militant “sows division wherever they tread.” Also, The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) revoked media credentials for Mr. Voris and Church Militant, therefore does not allow the media outlet to cover USCCB events.

https://www.crookston.org/bishop/from-the-bishop/1221-romancatholicrevival
 
Last edited:
He was not ‘exposing’ anyone when he was ordered to stop using “Catholic” as part of his organization.
 
Um, isn’t Hoeppner being investigated for covering up child abuse? (See CNA Nov 2019). I can think of several reasons why he would want to spike a Voris talk that have nothing to do with schism.
 
And the USCCB have agreed with this ?

They did with Michael Voris
 
INNEAPOLIS — A Minnesota bishop who’s the subject of a Vatican-ordered investigation said in sworn testimony released Tuesday that he was trying to protect the confidentiality of a man who said he was sexually abused by a popular priest when he certified to other church officials that the priest was fit for ministry and to work with children.

Bishop Michael Hoeppner of the Diocese of Crookston in northwestern Minnesota acknowledged in the videotaped deposition last year that he stated in writing to the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis in 2012 that Monsignor Roger Grundhaus was “a person of good moral character and reputation” and that he was unaware of anything in the priest’s background that would “render him unsuitable to work with minor children.”

But the accuser, Ron Vasek, had already told Hoeppner by 2011 that Grundhaus had abused him in the early 1970s when he was 16. Vasek was hoping to become a deacon when he met with the bishop. Vasek would later sue the diocese, alleging that the bishop blackmailed him into retracting his allegations. That lawsuit settled for an undisclosed sum in 2017.

Pressed by attorney Jeffrey Anderson on why he made that assertion to the archdiocese when he already knew about Vasek’s allegations, the bishop replied that Vasek had asked him for “complete confidentiality” and that he was respecting that.

Minnesota bishop defends conduct in sexual abuse case | National Catholic Reporter
 
One Bishop’s opinion has no authority if the institution or person he’s addressing on an issue, isn’t in that Bishops Dioceses, or has been part of an agreement from the USCCB
 
Anyway, I don’t listen to Church Militant as I believe they’re not spiritually edifying.

Others obviously like Michael Voris
 
So they’re headquartered in Bishop Finn’s dioceses ?

Anyway, I used NCR, but it was one of the several sources.

I just didn’t think that people would accept what secular sources like the NYT’s.
 
Inasmuch as they promote heretics, schismatics, and think of themselves as above the Church, I tend to think of them as those things, and avoid them accordingly. Your professor is probably right. And nothing they report on will aid your salvation, and may be a detriment to it, so it is not okay to watch or read in my eyes, but of course you can disagree.
 
That’s the guy, alright. Is it schismatic to ask questions about all those settlements?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top