If I have been dishonest, please point out where.
in post #1058, you wrote this:
“Who on this thread has quoted an evolutionist out of context in an attempt to show that he didn’t really believe in it? Techno2000 (Patterson, Gould), Glark (Lewontin), ericc (Williams).”
Your claim that I quoted Lewonitn “in attempt to show that he didn’t really believe in it (evolution)”. This is nonsense; I did no such thing. So you’re either dishonest - or you can’t comprehend plain English and jump to stupid conclusions. Okay, I’ll recant the former accusation, and assume the latter.
Furthermore, I’ve challenged several of your points of view, but you ignore 99% of them. Instead of engaging me, you run away.
Now to another of your posts:
Glark: "You believe God created the entire universe out of nothing, can raise people from the dead, can convert bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ in an instant, but you can’t believe that that same God can’t halt the flow of a little ol’ river for a couple of hours?”
Hugh_Farey: “Wrong, of course. As usual you confuse what God could do with what he actually did do.”
What?? The Bible describes “what he actually did do” - the book of Joshua says he stopped the flow of the Jordan river! You are the one confused about “what he actually did do”! Your problem is pride, my friend; you’re so full of yourself that you think you know better than the Scriptures. And your religion isn’t Catholicism, it’s some weird Catho-Scientism hybrid thing that is bizarre even by theistic-evolution standards.
Theologians thinking the bible and evolution are compatible. Brendan Purcell. Christoph Cardinal Schönborn. George Murphy. etc.
In the Catholic Church that I belong to, none of the theologians think evolution is compatible with the Bible.