B
buffalo
Guest
Sure He could. Science is showing He didn’t.
- Status
B
buffalo
Guest
Even with such scanty evidence they have to agree that the fossil record shows abrupt appearance over and over, then stasis and variation withing. The record is very discontinuous and goes against evo theory. Discontinuity is the enemy of Darwinism.
B
buffalo
Guest
JEPD has run its course…
E
edwest211
Guest
Selective miracle selection is wrong. Just wrong.
E
edwest211
Guest
“With God all things are possible.” ? Like what? Certainly not a wind 'em up and watch it go mechanism.
E
edwest211
Guest
But ‘talking in circles’ is one of the methods to promote textbook evolution.
Last edited:
E
edwest211
Guest
There aren’t any. Everything worked. It got old enough to leave a substantial skeleton behind. Insect trapped in amber: multiple legs, compound eyes and wings. It just happened to happen. Something something.
Or something.
Or something.
Last edited:
R
rossum
Guest
A dinosaur has a mutation that prevents its kidneys functioning properly. They can just about keep the animal alive, but it cannot function as well as its contemporaries. Do you really expect a kidney to fossilise? Only mutations that visibly affect teeth or bones will show up in the fossil record, and the majority of mutations do not affect teeth of bones: an earthworm does not have either teeth or bones for instance.
Have you calculated the proportion of vertebrate animals (ones with bones) that fossilise? Have you calculated the proportion of vertebrate animals with visible mutational damage in their bones or teeth?
When you have done those calculations then you will be in a better position to say whether there is a shortage of such fossils.
rossum
Last edited:
R
rossum
Guest
Why not? Are you saying that the omnipotent God is incapable of making a “wind 'em up and watch it go mechanism”?
If God cannot make such a mechanism, then God is not omnipotent. This looks like a theological error to me.
rossum
B
buffalo
Guest
Catholics know God as being almighty. Big difference.
T
Techno2000
Guest
There should be thousands of transitional fossils leading to Archaeopteryx thousands of transitional fossils leading to birds.And why did all these transitional animals die out, we still have Europeans ?
E
edwest211
Guest
Your odds of winning the lottery are much better.
E
edwest211
Guest
Europeans!!?? Are Europeans transitional 
T
Techno2000
Guest
Yes,the earth from which God used to create us with, the flesh and the pineapples both come from a earthly substance. The earth is the common ancestor.
E
edwest211
Guest
Uh… ok… ?
T
Techno2000
Guest
Yes , God does use evolution create some things example : tadpole to frog, caterpillar to butterfly, but notice God’s evolution only takes a couple of weeks… not millions of years.
R
rossum
Guest
You didn’t bother to do the calculations, did you. Yes, we do have a few examples of mistakes. Not many, because the great majority of organisms do not have significant or fossilisable mistakes.
Look around you. How many cats do you see? What proportion of those cats have an obvious genetic error? And domestic cats are worse than wild cats, because some breeds have deliberately retained genetic errors through artificial selection by breeders.
Go and do the calculation.
rossum
T
Techno2000
Guest
That’s rossum way of explaining why some things died out and something didn’t, the rests is just vagueness.Europeans!!?? Are Europeans transitional
R
rossum
Guest
We do have transitionals both before and after Archaeopteryx, mostly from China. A lot of them died out when the Chixulub meteor hit. That caused a sudden significant change in the environment, which only a few then living bird species survived.
rossum
- Status