Is Darwin's Theory of Evolution True? Part 4.1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Techno2000
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Techno2000 said:
What did the dinosaur evolve from ? Lets see… it started out tiny, then millions of years later it became huge, and then millions of years later it became tiny again…really ?
Click to expand...
No, you need to study more. Dinosaurs started medium sized. Some species evolved to be very large, some stayed about the same size and some evolved to be small.

Think of mammals. Are mammals all the same size? Some are small: mice, some are medium size: dogs and some are large: elephants. Are you really not able to see that dinosaurs did the same.

Flying mammals, bats, evolved from species at the smaller end of the mammalian size range. Birds evolved from species at the smaller end of the dinosaur size range.

Was that really so difficult to work out?

rossum
 
rossum said:
No, you need to study more. Dinosaurs started medium sized. Some species evolved to be very large, some stayed about the same size and some evolved to be small.
Click to expand...
I don"t believe in Darwinism to being with.
 
Yes, we all know this. The point is a NEW species does not mean a really NEW species. These two have lost an ability they once had.
 
Techno2000 said:
The point is, you can only give vague answers to my questions .
Click to expand...
Really?

You: “What was the environmental catalyst that triggered random mutations to produce the beautiful fragrance of the Rose?”
Me: “The environmental catalyst producing the rose was entirely human. The rose as depicted is the result of selective breeding with a full body, deep colour and intense scent as desired outcomes. It has nothing to do with environmental pressures in its ‘natural’ habitat. [etc.]:”
You: “Do you think the Rose is the only flower that has a fragrance?”
Me: “No.”

What’s vague about that?
 
You keep saying this, but it’s a goofy way of looking at it.

The NEW species is really a NEW species, because that species didn’t exist on Earth before. That’s what NEW means.

For example, there didn’t used to be people on Earth. Now there are people. People are a NEW species. We aren’t monkeys who have lost the ability to climb trees super well.

There didn’t used to be giraffes on Earth. Now there are giraffes. Giraffes, relatively speaking, are a NEW species. They aren’t deer who lost the ability to have a short neck.

Whales are a relatively new species as well. They haven’t lost the ability to walk on land.
 
Last edited:
Hugh_Farey said:
40.png
Techno2000:
The point is, you can only give vague answers to my questions .
Click to expand...
Really?

You: “What was the environmental catalyst that triggered random mutations to produce the beautiful fragrance of the Rose?”
Me: “The environmental catalyst producing the rose was entirely human. The rose as depicted is the result of selective breeding with a full body, deep colour and intense scent as desired outcomes. It has nothing to do with environmental pressures in its ‘natural’ habitat. [etc.]:”
You: “Do you think the Rose is the only flower that has a fragrance?”
Me: “No.”

What’s vague about that?
Click to expand...
OK, maybe I was wrong, let me rephrase the question. What was the environmental catalyst that triggered random mutations to produce the flavor,color, aroma and beauty of all the plants we have on the Earth ?
 
Last edited:
benjamin1973 said:
NEW species
Click to expand...
Beyond what we label as a species is, to avoid confusion and differentiate the two, what we might call simply a kind of animal. There are different kinds of animals. Each animal is an individual being, a form of existence, in itself. We can observe the physical aspect of the animal using our senses and their extensions (eg - microscopes, spectrometers). We can formulate how the various organ systems, the individual cells and the molecular components interact in the living creature. Each organ, cell, and molecule exists separated as itself, but is subsumed in the unity that is the organism’s existence as itself. The life form also has a psychological dimension, in animals made up of instinctive patterns of perception, emotion, and behaviour. There is one living thing out there to which our understanding as a rational creature connects to provide all this sort of information and share it among ourselves. That instinctive and physical nature comes together as a whole, which is a manifestation of the kind of animal it is. Different kinds of animals were brought into existence to multiply and diversify in the process. This is why we have house cats, lions, tigers, lynx’s, cougars, leopards, Jaguars etc. Most of the major physical diversification would have resulted from built-in genetic mechanisms Others, especially the types of changes that result in illness, would be caused by mutations occurring as a result of random chemical events, such as the glitches that inevitably occur and cannot be corrected for by the DNA’s systems of repair, as well as other physical causes like radiation, toxins and viruses.
 
Last edited:
Let me explain. The ones that survived survived. Apparently, like a plane crash, the unlucky ones are gone for good. Unless a few were living in a remote location and survived.

DNA erased? How can anyone know that?
 
They are the same animal. They just cannot interbreed. The only thing “NEW” is they can NO LONGER reproduce.

I would call that “the same, but less”.
 
These questions have been asked and answered many times. The point in creation is evolution 😉 Ok let me explain. IDK about Darwinism or anything about it. We still as the human embryo have the yolk sac that was one time used. We still have the muscles behind our ears we used to move our ears. Few can use them now. Why is the heart the only involuntary organ we can’t control that is “cross striped” muscle? It’s becoming a voluntary organ. Look into Dewachen. This place was created before God said “Let there be light”. By one in a previous creation that was never human but is in our existence now. I will leave it at that.
 
Techno2000 said:
What was the environmental catalyst that triggered random mutations to produce the flavor,color, aroma and beauty of all the plants we have on the Earth ?
Click to expand...
I can’t answer that but how fortunate for bees and flowers that their DNA coding for the respective traits which are so well matched and otherwise useless, randomly glitched together. Talk about being at the right place at the right time!

Why do flowers have scents?

www.scientificamerican.com www.scientificamerican.com
 
Last edited:
Then you don’t understand what a species is. But I knew that already, so. . .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top