Is Darwin's Theory Of Evolution True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Techno2000
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
In a sense we are all half of one organism and half of another. Sometimes the result isn’t viable.
 
the_universal said:
I can’t answer that; I don’t know what you’re referring to.
Click to expand...
I mean the midway point of one species changing into a completely different species. An example would be the so-called half dinosaur and half bird creature.
 
To quote Techno2000: quote How does half of one organism and half another survive . End quote.

You can’t have any sort of transitional creature - at all.
 
Last edited:
Unless every creature is transitional. Changes accumulate.

The point at which there is a new species is not the point at which mother and daughter look fundamentally different. It is the point at which a creature in this herd of the species cannot reproduce by mating with a creature from that herd of the species.
 
edwest211 said:
To quote Techno2000: quote How does half of one organism and half another survive . End quote.

You can’t have any sort of transitional creature - at all.
Click to expand...
Right, it would need a mate at the exact same stage of development to reproduce .Also different food, different defence abilities, different habitat to live… on and on for every stage.
 
Nope.

“The point at which there is a new species is not the point at which mother and daughter look fundamentally different. It is the point at which a creature in this herd of the species cannot reproduce by mating with a creature from that herd of the species.”
 
For example, there are many types of birds. Some look identical but cannot breed, or some end up stopping breeding. That in no way shows evolution to be true. Take human beings, all the various racial groups can produce children with other racial groups. However, find a good reference showing the dramatic differences in skull shapes between Orientals, Caucasoids and Negroids. All are human, all have equal dignity, but there are certain anatomical differences. That does not show evolution to be factual either.
 
Everything is continually adapting and evolving. Sometimes there is a more clear demarcation between species resulting from isolation such as being on an island.
 
Humans are all the same species. We can all interbreed no matter where we originated.
 
Novel features require a step by step fitness advantage. In other words the nub of a wing must have a survival advantage.
 
Not altogether true. Features may persist without reproductive advantage. But, in general, that’s not an unfair statement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top