Is Darwin's Theory Of Evolution True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Techno2000
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
They will claim contamination and all sorts of problems. However, they now have to admit the soft tissue finding. Step by step, inch by inch…
 
Which shows that the poster of that video does not understand carbon dating.

If I have a set of kitchen scales which weigh up to 20 pounds max, and I stand on those scales they will register 20 pounds. What does that mean?

a) I weigh 20 pounds?

b) I have maxed out the scales and I weigh 20 pounds or more?

If you answered a) then I can let you have have the wonderful rossum weight loss plan with no exercise and no dieting, a steal for just $499.99 + p&p (scales included).

Your video did the same thing with those dino bones. Carbon dating is good to about 35,000 years bp, which is what your link said:
Dinosaur bones with modern carbon removed by acid pretreatment have been radiocarbon dated (Carbon-14) by professional laboratories to between 22,000 and 39,000 years before present.
Click to expand...
Whatever else that shows, you have confirmed that a 6,000 year old earth is definitively falsified.

rossum
 
Techno2000 said:
40.png
anon65111186:
God must have certainly been behind these mechanisms, as He is present today in current evolution.
Click to expand...
So you believe God had to use evolution to create the natural world we have today ?
Click to expand...
Didn’t have to. But He did.
 
Techno2000 said:
40.png
buffalo:
Decontaminated dinosaur bones Carbon-14 dated
Click to expand...
65 million years ago… or 30 thousand years ago, they both can’t be right.
Click to expand...
The 30K determination is probably in error, since it is at odds with so much other evidence. Get enough 30K samples and you might change some minds. But one or two fluke readings are probably just a mistake.
 
Where did I say that? I said RC dating is good to about 55,000 years BP.

How did they date those 3 billion year old rocks?
 
I believe they are referencing something that has been done many times, anonymously sending in parts of dinosaur fossils and having them dated, and they usually come up as fairly young. It’s not just a couple of times, either, but many.
I find it interesting. I believe the Kolbe institute (a Catholic creationist apostolate) has info on it.
It’s quite a queer thing, and would be something that requires explanation.
The world’s a strange place
 
Last edited:
Of course it has to be in error. We know it has to be in error. How? We just know it has to be. Just like evolution. We just know it has to be. Blind faith.
 
Yes, it sure does. Now the claim is that the soft tissue can last 65 million years. It has to be so.
 
buffalo said:
Of course it has to be in error. We know it has to be in error. How? We just know it has to be. Just like evolution. We just know it has to be. Blind faith.
Click to expand...
No, by the scientific process. Examine the evidence, propose a theory, gather more evidence to test the theory, repeat. I said that if you found enough cases of “young dinosaurs” you would have a chance of changing the theory, and I meant it. Scientific theories must be falsifiable. I just haven’t seen the evidence, confirmed by multiple sources, that young dinosaurs exist. The bar is quite high to overturning established theory, but it is possible. You just want it to be too easy.
 
Last edited:
Darwinism can be. As a personal choice. However it denies intelligent design! And scripture! Therefore denying all that God has done.
Science and athiests prefer trying to prove God does not exist.
However. Psychologist say that it is impossible for mans simple mind to concoct a God without one being there in the first place!
 
That sums it up well. At best, if God was involved, He just walked away to let non-God forces take over as if He needed that.

Matthew 8:24

New International Version
Suddenly a furious storm came up on the lake, so that the waves swept over the boat. But Jesus was sleeping.

New Living Translation
Suddenly, a fierce storm struck the lake, with waves breaking into the boat. But Jesus was sleeping.

English Standard Version
And behold, there arose a great storm on the sea, so that the boat was being swamped by the waves; but he was asleep.

8:25

New International Version
The disciples went and woke him, saying, “Lord, save us! We’re going to drown!”

New Living Translation
The disciples went and woke him up, shouting, “Lord, save us! We’re going to drown!”

English Standard Version
And they went and woke him, saying, “Save us, Lord; we are perishing.”

8:26

New International Version
He replied, “You of little faith, why are you so afraid?” Then he got up and rebuked the winds and the waves, and it was completely calm.

New Living Translation
Jesus responded, “Why are you afraid? You have so little faith!” Then he got up and rebuked the wind and waves, and suddenly there was a great calm.

English Standard Version
And he said to them, “Why are you afraid, O you of little faith?” Then he rose and rebuked the winds and the sea, and there was a great calm.

8:27

New International Version
The men were amazed and asked, “What kind of man is this? Even the winds and the waves obey him!”

New Living Translation
The disciples were amazed. “Who is this man?” they asked. “Even the winds and waves obey him!”

English Standard Version
And the men marveled, saying, “What sort of man is this, that even winds and sea obey him?”
 
anon65111186 said:
I really wonder where you get these suppositions, they all seem rather unreasonable.
Click to expand...
But it’s reasonable to believe chemicals formed together to create the first cell , and all life as we know today sprung from it ?
 
Yes. But implying I believe God is bound to do something is bad Theology, God is only bound by the law of non-contradiction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top