Is Dr. Scott Hahn an Opus Dei?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pythagoras
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t think Dr. Hahn would have a problem with someone having questions about what he wrote on the Holy Spirit. I’m not a bible-scholar but I would like to see some things made more clear.

But I would never turn to Robert Sungenis about this. The guy wants people to see him as an expert so much that he got a “Phd” from a degree mill that isn’t acredited in the US or anywhere else–

lumengentleman.com/content.asp?id=242

It looks like Sungenis and his friend Chris Ferrara have had a personal problem with Hahn. They attacked Hahn befroe really reading his writings–

lumengentleman.com/content.asp?id=56

Its the same thing Sungenis does with other people he’s got a personal thing with.

If a person can go after someone before even reading what they write what are the chances their going to be fair to them even after?

I don’t see Hahn or Keating doing that to anyone.

So, who are some of the better sources who have written? I heard that NOR had a couple of things and one of them looked more fair than the other one. I thought it was kind of rediculous though when NOR said that what Hahn wrote supported gay unions.

Holy Spirit maternal with Mary = gay

Well, then, is it gay when a priest (man) is Chirst the groom and a man receives communion as the bride?

That just looks silly, like their going to far with the analogy.
 
Is there anything wrong with Opus Dei? I don’t know much about it. :o

But I remember the things written about Dr. Hahn and Holy Spirit. A lot of it seemed unfair to me. And I have to agree that of all the people to criticize, Mr. Sungenis and not the one for the task.

He gets so angry and uncharitable, self-righteous, like if you question him seriously or disagree you’re questioning and disagreeing with God. I just finished reading everything he wrote about Jews from another thread here and I thought it was terrible. So I wouldn’t be surprised if he was equally unfair fair with Dr. Hahn. Maybe he’s jealous? 😦

I’m not planning on throwing out any of Dr. Hahn’s books. No.
 
Hi Brenda,

Opus Dei, as pointed out above, is a personal prelature of the Catholic Church, founded by St. Josemaría Escriva in 1929 and formally elevated to the status of personal prelature By Pope JPII in 1982.

If you don’t understand what a personal prelature is, don’t worry… not many people would since Opus Dei is presently the only Catholic group that enjoys this status. Basically, it means that the members of Opus Dei have their own bishop (presently, Monsignor Javier Echeverría) and that, under his authority, they form a kind of “borderless diocese” if you will. But they are also subject to the authority of bishops in whose diocese they may reside.

So, in all that pertains to their vocations as members of “the Work” as they refer to it in English, as well as their spiritual formation and direction, they are subject to the authority of their prelate. In matters relating to everything else (i.e., their participation in activities in a parish or their diocese) they are subject to the authority of the local bishop.

Some people DO have a problem with them, yes. One reason is the personal prelature thing… some people regard it as a way of circumventing the authority of the local bishop and allowing them to do things without his consent. Not true. :rolleyes:

Others object to the strict separation of men and women in all of their activities. Not only are students in the schools which members organise and run divided by gender, but the teaching and administrative staffs too. There are no male teachers or staff in girl’s schools and no women in the organised for boy’s. In addition, celibate male and female members of the work receive their spiritual formation separately and do not participate in retreats or engage in apostolic activities together. Totally separate. :hmmm:

You may remember that the DaVinci Code painted them as an ultra-secret sect within the Church. They are generally accused even by good Catholics of being secretive about their organisation, its structure and its internal organisation. Too long to go into here, and there is some truth to it, but a lot of this depends on one’s perspective and what “openness” ought to involve. To really understand why the group developed the way it did, you have to understand something of the time and place in which it was born–Spain, in 1929, in the very anti-clerical and anti-Catholic atmosphere that existed just before the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War. That war and all its attendant issues and horrors has profoundly marked at least two generations of Spaniards and its effects are still being felt today. 😦

They are also accused of “hard-sell” recruiting tactics when seeking out potential vocations, and of targeting only bright, well-educated and professional men and women. I will only say here that I have met some zealous ones… and as for the latter charge, well, given their spirituality of the sanctifying nature of work well done and offered to God, that holiness is everyone’s vocation and that for the laity it’s to be found in the fulfillment of one’s professional and family duties… it’s logical enough. They believe in the responsibility of Christians to transform society from their places of work, and so they do seem to place a lot of emphasis on finding and forming professional men and women in the spirit of The Work. But their members do run inner-city programs for disadvantaged youths and charitable foundations for the poor too.

As far as I know, St. Mary of the Angels Church in Chicago is still the only parish staffed by priests of the Prelature of Opus Dei in the U.S. It’s a good parish. And the majority of the parishioners are not members of Opus Dei either.

Sorry for the really long reply. I’ll just add before closing here that 1) no, I am not a member of Opus Dei, that 2) no, I’m not inclined to become one either, for reasons which I won’t go into here, but which IN NO WAY reflect negatively on Opus Dei–they’re personal, though I do disagree with their approach to things on a few important points-- that 3) yes, I do know quite a few members of Opus Dei and have quite a few close, personal friends that I love very much who are in the group, and that 4) there is a good book by John Allen of the National Catholic Reporter (not a likely candidate for the Opus Dei fan club roll) in which he closely examines the group and ends up with a surprisingly favourable opinion of them. :eek:
 
Is there anything wrong with Opus Dei? I don’t know much about it. :o
Nope, there is nothing wrong with Opus Dei. It is a perfectly legitimate Catholic organization, with as much legitimacy as the Dominicans, Franscicans, etc. Of course, Opus Dei members are not always perfect, but negative talk I have heard about the organization seems to come mostly from non or ex-catholics who seem to me to be unreliable sources of information about anything Catholic.

That notwithstanding, noone who does not feel called to join Opus Dei need worry about it – you can be a saintly Catholic with or without Opus Dei.
 
Thank you Moneo and Sam! 🙂

After everything I just finished reading and seeing Robert Sungenis’ name mentioned, I was almost expecting to read that Opus Dei was involved in a Jewish conspiracy with Dr. Hahn! 😛
 
Can anyone tell me why it matters if he is a member of Opus Dei or not? I don’t see why it’s important to know.
I don’t think it’s important to know, but in light of the hints that he is, it’s a good question. Curiosity is generally a virtue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top