L
Lermont
Guest
See the original posting.Care to offer any examples? Or are you just interested in ad hominem attacks?
See the original posting.Care to offer any examples? Or are you just interested in ad hominem attacks?
I said no such thing, but the responses as show in #25 of this thread are all too common. And sadly it harms the Church.I guess this can be interpreted as saying the forums allow any post to be made, even “odd, disjointed and illogical” ones and that is the biggest problem. But my initial take on reading it is that you were saying that most posts in these forums are odd, disjointed and illogical.
How did you reach that conclusion? It’s not logical based on what I said.That seems like a blanket dismissal of the forums.
Just one moment. First I said I like EWTN and that I have benefited from it in my original position. Nevertheless I was attacked by some and you are suggesting I was too critical of their attacks? C’mon…Lermont, as someone who has lurked at CAF for some time, you must have known that many folks here like EWTN. And you would have known that posting a thread critical of that channel would provoke them. Please don’t be so critical of people who are sticking up for something they enjoy. I don’t watch EWTN, but if you don’t like it, why not just watch what you do enjoy?
Changing directions? Riiiiight. I find it hard to believe that you are even “new member”. More than likely you got mad at a TV program and decided to use a different screen name to come on here and express your “opinion”. Because at the end of it all it really is just your opinion.Why are you changing direction on me now after I answered your question?
OK, please go back to my OP and explain to me how it is so negative.
Also please show me where I “put down the entire site” please.
Thanks.
This is from memory, which is getting a bit shakey, but I think it is pretty accurate. I followed the Mahoney controversy that was very public.Just one moment. First I said I like EWTN and that I have benefited from it in my original position. Nevertheless I was attacked by some and you are suggesting I was too critical of their attacks? C’mon…
Please name two strange theories they teach.EWTN often reduces the idea of legitimate positions to one (when there is more than one) and often with their own strange theories.
Rarely? Ok, name one wrong position.I would have less problems with them if they were humbler, gave a variety of possible positions, and let people see and realize it is not so simplistic and hence fundamentalist as they make it out to be. EWTN rarely seems to take a wrong position
Name one., but it OFTEN excludes/denigrates other legitimate positions and I find that to be VERY fundamentalist.
Perhaps it is the reverse and those who see every matter as “gray” are simply unprincipled? Is that possible?EWTN seems to be VERY appealing to Catholics who want everything rigidly cut-n-dried and simplistic – much like some of our Fundamentalist Protestant Brethren.
Intolerant? Give some examples.It certainly appealed greatly to me when I knew even less about the faith then I do today. I worry however that many are receiving an intolerant formation from EWTN – particularly in the area of apologetics and that ultimately it’s going to harm the Church.
Bishop Foley issued an instruction forbidding the celebration of the Mass ad orientum. Mother Angelica appealed to the Vatican, which instructed +Foley to repeal his instruction, noting that the Vatican allows the Mass to be celebrated either ad orientum or vs populum, and a bishiop may not restrict that further.Then Mother Angelica had some problems with her bishop. I don’t remember what it was about, but a Vatican representative was called in and he was kind of incredulous over what the Birmingham bishop was doing and called him pazzo, crazy. .
Amen!I really wished that was a joke. How much did the sculptor earn from that mannish statue of Mary?
I don’t even think that would qualify as Sacred Art.
And someone was suggesting in this thread that EWTN has a problem with this?
Looks like they got my vote of confidence!![]()
And, yet another jumps on the “Banned wagon”Not upset, but I am astounded at the lack of logic and fact used by people to discuss matters on these forums. I am also amazed at the amount of misdirection people try herein.
Most just seem to rely on emotion or personal opinion, or they add comments that add absolutely no value. Very weird.
I would tune in for that!There are several Eastern Catholic Churches in Birmingham, at least a Melkite and Maronite parish that I know of. Would it be such a crime to broadcast a Divine Liturgy from one of these Churches at least twice a month?
EWTN had a series awhile back (year or so, maybe?) called “Light of the East” that dealt w/ the Eastern Church, and frankly, I would have never known that JPII said something to the effect of “…the Eastern and Western are the two lungs of the Church, and she needs both to breathe…” if I hadn’t heard it on EWTN. So, I have to disagree w/ your assertion that they “perpetuate the myth” that the only Catholics are Roman. Plus, Fr. Mitch Pacwa is bi-ritual-he has Roman and Maronite faculties, and he discusses it frequently, and a Maronite Liturgy in which he concelebrated was broadcast on EWTN. Maybe you’re just not watching at the right times?I don’t want anyone to misread what I’m saying at all. I love EWTN, and I think it’s wonderful, but it’s lacking in so much.
I was chrismated into the Roman Church and had no idea that the Catholic Church was a Communion of Churches, just as it was for 1,000 years since it’s inception. After the Great Schism, only two Churches were left in the Communion, the Roman Church and the Maronite Church, respectively.
Later, several Churches broke from the Orthodox (who we believe broke Communion with Rome) returned to Rome such as the Melkites, Syriac Catholics, Greek Catholics, Chaldeans, etc. There are now a total of 23 Churches in the Catholic Church.
However, EWTN rarely ever covers these, and seems to perpetuate this myth that the only kind of Catholics are Roman Catholics. EWTN only covers 1/23 of the Catholic Church! How sad is that? There’s so much beauty in the Eastern Churches, and it’s sad that the Eastern Catholic Churches are America’s best kept secret, which is a shame. It deprives the Eastern Catholics of their traditions being told, simply because they are outnumbered by the Latin Catholics.
There are several Eastern Catholic Churches in Birmingham, at least a Melkite and Maronite parish that I know of. Would it be such a crime to broadcast a Divine Liturgy from one of these Churches at least twice a month? There are of course numerous other Eastern Catholic parishes in the US that I’m sure would be more than happy to have a broadcast of their DL on EWTN. Eastern Catholics are just as much Catholics as Latin Catholics are.
Alaha minokhoun
Andrew
I know that Fr. Pacwa is bi-ritual and can celebrate liturgies in both Churches. Whenever shows about Eastern Churches have come on, it’s at a time when no one is watching, like 3am. for instance about a show on the Maronite “Rite” (it’s not a “rite” it’s a Church!!).EWTN had a series awhile back (year or so, maybe?) called “Light of the East” that dealt w/ the Eastern Church, and frankly, I would have never known that JPII said something to the effect of “…the Eastern and Western are the two lungs of the Church, and she needs both to breathe…” if I hadn’t heard it on EWTN. So, I have to disagree w/ your assertion that they “perpetuate the myth” that the only Catholics are Roman. Plus, Fr. Mitch Pacwa is bi-ritual-he has Roman and Maronite faculties, and he discusses it frequently, and a Maronite Liturgy in which he concelebrated was broadcast on EWTN. Maybe you’re just not watching at the right times?
In Christ,
Ellen