P
PJM
Guest
The replyOriginally Posted by tonyrey
I don’t regard every statement in the CCC as infallible. Do you?
It would be unjust if our eternal destiny were determined by one moment of our existence. If our wills were eternally set we would no longer free and capable of love in heaven.
** tonyrey **I am the one that said:"at the last battle the war is won at our death (hopefully). But I’ve been thinking. In the psalm it says: The heavens (plural) proclaim the glory of the Lord! If there is progressive movement in heaven how would this be accomplished? In heaven we will see clearly,our striving will be pure and centered in God. When we see others in their perfections- which are above or below us- we accept because we are “living in the eternal truth” Our striving will not be an earthly work. nannyma
My dear friend in Christ,
Please permit me to share with you the position of the RCC on the Catechesim.
The RCC uses a level of grading documents on there “Binding Authority.”
Level one always and everywhere binding
to Level five, which binds only those to whom the document is specifically addressed.
The Catechism is a Level 1 document as is the Code of Canon Law which mandates the following.
PLEASE UNDERSTAND,NO accusations are being levelrd; this is strictly information you need to be aware of:thumbsup:
Can. 751 Heresy is the obstinate denial or obstinate doubt after the reception of baptism of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith; apostasy is the total repudiation of the Christian faith; schism is the refusal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him.
Can. 752 Although not an assent of faith, a religious submission of the intellect and will must be given to a doctrine which the Supreme Pontiff or the college of bishops declares concerning faith or morals when they exercise the authentic magisterium, even if they do not intend to proclaim it by definitive act; therefore, the Christian faithful are to take care to avoid those things which do not agree with it.
In other words a TEACHING need not be “Infallibly pronounced” in order to have what ammounts to the same BINDING AUTHORITY:thumbsup:
Can. 753 Although the bishops who are in communion with the head and members of the college, whether individually or joined together in conferences of bishops or in particular councils, do not possess infallibility in teaching, they are authentic teachers and instructors of the faith for the Christian faithful entrusted to their care; the Christian faithful are bound to adhere with religious submission of mind to the authentic magisterium of their bishops.
Can. 754 All the Christian faithful are obliged to observe the constitutions and decrees which the legitimate authority of the Church issues in order to propose doctrine and to proscribe erroneous opinions, particularly those which the Roman Pontiff or the college of bishops puts forth.
The BOLD verses apply to the Catecheism. Obedience to all is required, and its not a personal option to refuse.
Perhaps if you’d care to share you’re issues of disagreement, we might be able to futher expalin the teaching in question?
One is either an IPRC [informed, practicing, Roman Catholic] totally, or one simply is not a Catholic.
To: nanyma
Very insightful post, but why heavens (plural} and not heaven singular? There is only one
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Smile :) :)"
Love and prayers,
Pat