W
whatistrue
Guest
You were replying to a post that only said that guitar does not equal rock. No, you did not make that statement in so many words, but it was a reasonable inference.Well, I don’t believe I said that.
You were replying to a post that only said that guitar does not equal rock. No, you did not make that statement in so many words, but it was a reasonable inference.Well, I don’t believe I said that.
Um…no. I’ll take the clean tones of my Les Paul over my acoustic. Sure, I can “rock out” with it but that’s not the only thing.Rocking out is not the sole use of a guitar. Electric guitars, maybe, but not guitars as a whole.
I couldn’t agree more. Mind you, I grew up in a household with five musician siblings, all of whom played the guitar to the point where I still wish it were banned everywhere.it’s not the time and place and the mass should be different
I regret that I could only give you one “like” for this one. LOLfor making fun of Kum By Ya.
This is not a moral issue, nor one of validity.Me and my girlfriend have been “debating” the moral validity of guitar mass. I basically just say it’s not the time and place and the mass should be different from everything else you experience. I was wondering if anyone has good objections to guitar mass and what doctors of the church have said on the matter.
Looks like I struck a minor chord with that postRocking out is not the sole use of a guitar. Electric guitars, maybe, but not guitars as a whole.
In all fairness, I said “maybe.” If you, for instance, could play electric guitar solemnly, I’d love to hear it. It’s true that acoustic guitars in large gatherings are electric, however, that’s not necessarily the kind of electric guitar I meant.