B
bjford
Guest
Please forgive me if I sound negative or cynical, but I’m just trying to find the truth of this matter. I tried searching this post, but nobody reallly got to the heart of the matter from what I’ve read.
I have a question about music at mass. Recently, I was at a Charismatic Questions and Answers meeting, and one person asked if Praise and Worship was acceptable at mass. The canon lawyer said that it was fine. Now, the US Bishops wrote on a footnote of the 1975 Sacramentary that they have refrained from singling out any instruments from the liturgy, referencing Sacrosanctum Concilium (I believe its the footnote to sec. 274 in the GIRM Appendix, titled “Musical Instruments”). However, Sacrosanctum Concilium says:
…But other instruments also may be admitted for use in divine worship, with the knowledge and consent of the competent territorial authority, as laid down in Art. 22, 52, 37, and 40. This may be done, however, only on condition that the instruments are suitable, or can be made suitable, for sacred use, accord with the dignity of the temple, and truly contribute to the edification of the faithful.
And its follow-up encyclical, Musicam Sacram, says:
*63. In permitting and using musical instruments, the culture and traditions of individual peoples must be taken into account. However, those instruments which are, by common opinion and use, suitable for secular music only, are to be altogether prohibited from every liturgical celebration and from popular devotions.
*
And before all of this, Pope Pius’ XII encyclical Sacrae Musicae says:
*42. It must be holy. It must not allow within itself anything that savors of the profane nor allow any such thing to slip into the melodies in which it is expressed. …
Second, if you say that it is suitable because guitar now is seen in the liturgy, and considered by some to also be a liturgical instrument, wouldn’t this be based on disobedience, since after Musicam Sacram and Vatican II, people started playing popular tunes at mass, when guitar was not considered to be a secular instrument?
Third, if you say that guitar music isn’t appropriate for the liturgy, does that mean the US bishops are being disobedient?
Thanks!
I have a question about music at mass. Recently, I was at a Charismatic Questions and Answers meeting, and one person asked if Praise and Worship was acceptable at mass. The canon lawyer said that it was fine. Now, the US Bishops wrote on a footnote of the 1975 Sacramentary that they have refrained from singling out any instruments from the liturgy, referencing Sacrosanctum Concilium (I believe its the footnote to sec. 274 in the GIRM Appendix, titled “Musical Instruments”). However, Sacrosanctum Concilium says:
…But other instruments also may be admitted for use in divine worship, with the knowledge and consent of the competent territorial authority, as laid down in Art. 22, 52, 37, and 40. This may be done, however, only on condition that the instruments are suitable, or can be made suitable, for sacred use, accord with the dignity of the temple, and truly contribute to the edification of the faithful.
And its follow-up encyclical, Musicam Sacram, says:
*63. In permitting and using musical instruments, the culture and traditions of individual peoples must be taken into account. However, those instruments which are, by common opinion and use, suitable for secular music only, are to be altogether prohibited from every liturgical celebration and from popular devotions.
*
And before all of this, Pope Pius’ XII encyclical Sacrae Musicae says:
*42. It must be holy. It must not allow within itself anything that savors of the profane nor allow any such thing to slip into the melodies in which it is expressed. …
- Besides the organ, other instruments can be called upon to give great help in attaining the lofty purpose of sacred music, so long as they play nothing profane nothing clamorous or strident and nothing at variance with the sacred services or the dignity of the place. Among these the violin and other musical instruments that use the bow are outstanding because, when they are played by themselves or with other stringed instruments or with the organ, they express the joyous and sad sentiments of the soul with an indescribable power. Moreover, in the encyclical Mediator Dei, We Ourselves gave detailed and clear regulations concerning the musical modes that are to be admitted into the worship of the Catholic religion.
Second, if you say that it is suitable because guitar now is seen in the liturgy, and considered by some to also be a liturgical instrument, wouldn’t this be based on disobedience, since after Musicam Sacram and Vatican II, people started playing popular tunes at mass, when guitar was not considered to be a secular instrument?
Third, if you say that guitar music isn’t appropriate for the liturgy, does that mean the US bishops are being disobedient?
Thanks!