J
JMJ_coder
Guest
Hello,
No, he is being accepting of other tastes. He does now have low expectations of others.
No, he is being accepting of other tastes. He does now have low expectations of others.
Hello,
We are those in the Church. Them are those who are new to the Church.
Oh, nice try again.Well, if you think Father Corapi is not an orthodox Catholic Priest, well that explains ALOT!
Capable of what YOU want them to do. Heaven for bid if they don’t agree with you. Wow, what a black and white world you live in coder. Someone doesn’t like what you like so they must be dancing to silly jingles in their parish and having low expectations of people.And it is not pride, it is know what a person is actually capable of, and it is not limited to ho-humming jingles and dance numbers, nor the level of English used in the funny pages!
I am not the Church, but merely a member of It. And I DO know enough to catechize a person; at least I can instruct them on the Real Presence.Oh I’m sure they can’t wait for you to teach themyou should let the Pope know that you will be the one to educate all the new people.
You have suggested that people shouldn’t be expected to know their parts in Latin because that is an elitist attitude. If you think that, it is logic to conclude then that the normal mode is to not being able or expected to learn their parts in Latin - which is a low expectation of others.This tactic of yours is getting old. No where in this thread do I ever suggest I have low expectations of the faithful. My posts can stand by this and I have faith others will see this. Nice try though![]()
You said:Oh, nice try again.I didn’t say he wasn’t an orthodox priest. Do you actually read all the words someone posts?
That reads to me like you think that Father Corapi doesn’t teach what the Church teaches.Instead of listening to every little thing Father Corapi says you might want to take a look at Church teaching on pride.
Capable of basic learning skills. Would you trust your car to some yo-yo who doesn’t know a spark plug from a fuel filter? Would you go to a doctor who couldn’t use a stethoscope? We expect people to know certain things and behave in certain ways all the time in our lives - why not in the one area that actually matters?Capable of what YOU want them to do. Heaven for bid if they don’t agree with you. Wow, what a black and white world you live in coder. Someone doesn’t like what you like so they must be dancing to silly jingles in their parish and having low expectations of people.
Christ said, say yes when you mean yes and no when you mean no and all else is from the evil one. Gray is satan’s favorite color.Wow, what a black and white world you live in coder.
It’s always humorous to have someone say “I’ll pray for you” pejoratively - especially after they accuse you of pride and elitism.You need some prayers and this thread needs to get back on topic!
There is a quantum difference. The Immaculate Conception is dogma which must be believed with faith. One can not be Catholic and reject the Immaculate Conception, but can be Catholic and refuse to learn Latin. I have no object to the learning of Latin, but I see no point in learning responses in Latin that one never uses. That seems like useless memorization for the common parishoner that attends Mass in the vernacular.Hello,
Is it necessary to know Latin to join the Catholic Church - no. Just like it is not necessary to know what the teaching on the Immaculate Conception is to join. But would you consider a Catholic well catechized if they don’t what the Immaculate Conception is?
I think this analogy my have failed to bring out the point I was aiming for. I was trying to show that while it is not a requirement to know Latin to join the Church, a Catholic in the course of his catechetical training, as part of learning the Mass, should learn his parts in Latin.There is a quantum difference. The Immaculate Conception is dogma which must be believed with faith. One can not be Catholic and reject the Immaculate Conception, but can be Catholic and refuse to learn Latin. I have no object to the learning of Latin, but I see no point in learning responses in Latin that one never uses. That seems like useless memorization for the common parishoner that attends Mass in the vernacular.
I was just complaining about this (and other things) in a recent post. I HATE electric guitars and drums. I am NOT going back to a Mass that has them. It’s very protestant (no offense to the prostestants) and is, I think, to entertain to a less-serious crowd. Whether it’s not allowed - I don’t see how it can be banned or anything, I just don’t like it.Unfortunately in the english mass they use electric bass and drums (horrible,horrible) the difference in the music is night and day, with the english mass sounding just awful, almost protestant sounding.
Hallelujah!
Praise God in his holy sanctuary;
give raise in the mighty dome of heaven.
Give praise for his mighty deeds,
praise him for his great majesty.
Give praise with blasts upon the horn,
praise him with harp and lyre.
Give praise with tambourines and dance,
praise him with flutes and strings.
Give praise with crashing cymbals,
praise him with sounding cymbals.
Let everything that has breath
give praise to the Lord!
Hallelujah!
(just felt like posting this)Code:- Psalm 150
While that is all well and good, that doesn’t necessarily justify using all of this stuff for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. These weren’t even used in the context of the liturgy of Ancient Israel. The Lord set down specific requirements. All you have to do is read through Leviticus and even parts of Numbers and Deuteronomy. The only instrument, if memory serves, that the Lord mentions is the horn to call Ancient Israel to worship.(just felt like posting this)
I agree with all of your sentiments - however, it is a bit of a red herring to say that the guitar has replaced the organ.While that is all well and good, that doesn’t necessarily justify using all of this stuff for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. These weren’t even used in the context of the liturgy of Ancient Israel. The Lord set down specific requirements. All you have to do is read through Leviticus and even parts of Numbers and Deuteronomy. The only instrument, if memory serves, that the Lord mentions is the horn to call Ancient Israel to worship.
That being said, it is rather sad that the guitar has replaced the organ as the instrument of choice, even though the documents clearly state that the organ has pride of place in liturgy. It’s as though we have forgotten what the documents state and are merely going with something simply because it’s easier and less cumbersone. No wonder liturgical music has gone downhill over the course of the last 40 years.
Of course, no one has told many of the parishes in my diocese. I have heard some pretty bad guitar music, to the point that some of it sounds like Tejano/Ranchera music. The sad part is that in my diocese, several parishes are stuck in a 1970s time warp and won’t invest in getting (or learning) better music.I agree with all of your sentiments - however, it is a bit of a red herring to say that the guitar has replaced the organ.
Certainly at my church, the instrument most often heard is the organ. The piano is second. On some rare occassions, the guitar is used. This seems to be the case in many other communities as well. Just as people sometimes talk about a new wave of priests coming out of the seminaries who are returning to “traditional liturgy”, so too are there a new wave of younger musicians taking jobs in parishes who are trained in the organ and “better” music. The days of the guitar mass are over; the 70’s and 80’s are long gone.
I hate to say it - and I say it at the risk of even being considered “racist” - but it really has a lot to do with where you are.Of course, no one has told many of the parishes in my diocese. I have heard some pretty bad guitar music, to the point that some of it sounds like Tejano/Ranchera music. The sad part is that in my diocese, several parishes are stuck in a 1970s time warp and won’t invest in getting (or learning) better music.
I agree. There are many hymns I can not so with a guitar and many more just aren’t the same. For example, “Dona Nobis Pacem” is night and day different on organ and guitar, but both work well. We have had an organist on occasion, but for the last few years we have not had one trained keyboard player of any flavor out of 1200 families. Such is our lot.I can understand using the guitar in some instances, for example, when the organ is out of commission; however, to use it all of the time? There are some pieces of Sacred Music that do not translate well from organ to guitar, and vice-versa.
Oddly enough, a priest friend and I were having dinner and we discussed the same thing. Although, his take is that Mexico does not have a strong choral tradition. What little the Church in Mexico has is what was brought over from Spain. In fact, the last vestiges of it was found in a little known composition by a Spanish priest that had settings for Vespers for the Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe. Yes, there is some organ music; however, it is not on the grand scale that exists in Europe or even in parts of the United States.I hate to say it - and I say it at the risk of even being considered “racist” - but it really has a lot to do with where you are.
Unfortunately, even though there is a great tradition of organ and choral music in Mexico and spanish speaking countries, the mass as it is celebrated by most hispanics in the United States doesn’t seem to reflect it. They need to be introduced to Victoria, et al.
I play classical guitar and use the guitar for finding pitch. It would be wonderful if our vocalists all had perfect pitch but they don’t. The guitar chorded quietly in the back ground adds greatly to vocal music. I especially love the sound of chants with the guitar.The guitar is allowable. And while the organ is given pride of place it is not a “sacred” instrument. It was used in the secular world before its use in the church
A number of points:That being said, it is rather sad that the guitar has replaced the organ as the instrument of choice, even though the documents clearly state that the organ has pride of place in liturgy. It’s as though we have forgotten what the documents state and are merely going with something simply because it’s easier and less cumbersone. No wonder liturgical music has gone downhill over the course of the last 40 years.
I can understand using the guitar in some instances, for example, when the organ is out of commission; however, to use it all of the time? There are some pieces of Sacred Music that do not translate well from organ to guitar, and vice-versa. However, some publishing houses, like OCP, send forth music that only works for the guitar and completely ignore the organ. My parish, along with a majority of parishes in my diocese, is pretty much stuck on the guitar. While we also have a piano, there is still something missing. The organ, on the other hand, gives me a sense that we are in the divine presence of the majesty of God. You just don’t get it with the guitar, especially when you have a lot of Protestant Praise and Worship stuff. It’s just not there.