J
JB_Brother_4446
Guest
You thank GOD you aren’t ruled by HIM?Stop. Just stop. I thank God we don’t live in a theocracy, no pun intended. So which sins shall we make illegal today![]()
![Confused :confused: :confused:](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png)
![Roll eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png)
You thank GOD you aren’t ruled by HIM?Stop. Just stop. I thank God we don’t live in a theocracy, no pun intended. So which sins shall we make illegal today![]()
Why would anyone make sarin gas in their bedroom? There is nothing intrinsically wrong with sarin gas. I don’t think we need the state to prohibit the manufacturing of it. The use of it to harm others would of course be a crime. But why would one trust the state to oversee this when they are the ones who not only make such toxic things but use them to kill people?So the government is bad for banning your from manufacturing sarin gas in your bedroom?
But therein lies your dilemma. Define homosexual behavior? Only that which involves genitals?No. However homosexual behavior should not be accorded the same protected status as Race, creed , gender and country of national origin.
Why have laws concerning the possession, transport or handling of dangerous goods at all? Perhaps because they present great danger, and we can’t readily know anyone’s intentions?Why would anyone make sarin gas in their bedroom? There is nothing intrinsically wrong with sarin gas. I don’t think we need the state to prohibit the manufacturing of it. The use of it to harm others would of course be a crime. But why would one trust the state to oversee this when they are the ones who not only make such toxic things but use them to kill people?
That’s interesting. Have these persons taken the view that sexual activity is not appropriate in same sex relations?But therein lies your dilemma. Define homosexual behavior? Only that which involves genitals?I know many gay couples who are dating and not having sex. So can they still hold hands and kiss? Or should that also be not protected?
Hmmm or maybe like any normal straight couple they are also waiting until marriage, as impossible as that may seem. Gay people are people tooThat’s interesting. Have these persons taken the view that sexual activity is not appropriate in same sex relations?
Which is why he’s saying what he is saying!Hmmm or maybe like any normal straight couple they are also waiting until marriage, as impossible as that may seem. Gay people are people too![]()
To simultaneously hold the views that:Hmmm or maybe like any normal straight couple they are also waiting until marriage, as impossible as that may seem. Gay people are people too![]()
Believe it or not there are actually homosexual Catholics. That may sound impossible to some that don’t believe in gay marriage.To simultaneously hold the views that:
1). The proper place of sex is in marriage only; And
2). Two men can get married
is not what I’d expect. The first is very traditional, very Christian, the second is not.
That is hardly surprising. But it has no bearing on the point made in my previous post.Believe it or not there are actually homosexual Catholics. That may sound impossible to some that don’t believe in gay marriage.
Just as your previous post has no bearing whatsoever on my completely legal normal and happy marriage. I’m so sorry you cannot possibly accept that.That is hardly surprising. But it has no bearing on the point made in my previous post.
It did not address at all your relationship. Are you seeking to debate an imagined issue, rather than the point made?Just as your previous post has no bearing whatsoever on my completely legal normal and happy marriage. I’m so sorry you cannot possibly accept that.
I am just saying that there are actually people who believe in both your points that sex is for marriage and that two men or women can be married happily.It did not address at all your relationship. Are you seeking to debate an imagined issue, rather than the point made?
A rapist can be happy raping women. An alcoholic can be happy drinking alcohol. Just because you can be happy doing something doesn’t mean it is good or right.I am just saying that there are actually people who believe in both your points that sex is for marriage and that two men or women can be married happily.
They may as well be Catholics if they were baptized in the Church, nobody is denying that. However, I do think you realize that what they’re doing goes against Church teaching.Believe it or not there are actually homosexual Catholics. That may sound impossible to some that don’t believe in gay marriage.
Just as your previous post has no bearing whatsoever on my completely legal normal and happy marriage. I’m so sorry you cannot possibly accept that.
congrats on being brave and posting on a forum that is distinctly against LGBTQ individuals having equal protection under our system of law!. We need more people from every walk of Catholic and non-Catholic life to post about their lives so that we all are able to learn and be more respectful to those different than themselves, especially when discussing sexual orientation. Hopefully your contributions will continue!
![]()
I disagree with the premise that this forum opposes equal protection under the law. That the State now issues marriage licenses to two men is not a protection, it reflects a decision to take a different view on the meaning of marriage.congrats on being brave and posting on a forum that is distinctly against LGBTQ individuals having equal protection under our system of law!. We need more people from every walk of Catholic and non-Catholic life to post about their lives so that we all are able to learn and be more respectful to those different than themselves, especially when discussing sexual orientation. Hopefully your contributions will continue!
![]()