A
anon5216
Guest
I’m glad you are enjoying the discussion as well. This is a Catholic forum, so I don’t want to get too far out of bounds.I know that you are not seeking converts. I just like the discussion.
Dumb question: if Jesus would not define himself within Hinduism, is it even acceptable for Hinduism to have a veiw of him within it?
Jesus’ self-identification with the Divine is precisely a defining within Hinduism, because Hinduism defines by substance, not by form (or words). Of course, the words are there to reveal the substance, but words can also fake it. There is no shortage of people claiming Enlightenment or Self-Realisation or God-Realisation within the Hindu tradition that are just conning gullible people out of their money or even just loyalty or worship. Those, however, can not deny the Truth of genuine God-Realized souls, any more than the false or corrupt Christian leaders can deny the Truth of someone like Padre Pio.
It’ be interesting to read the results of a group of impartial scholar types that formally research a comparison of the teachings of Jesus, the Jews, Hinduism and Buddhism (which in some circles is considered a reformation of Hinduism that opposed some of the excessive ritualistic form vs. substance that had crept into Hinduism).
Over the years of spiritual study and practice, my personal impression is that Jesus’ words share much more in common with Hinduism and Buddhism than with the Jewish religion - especially when comparing substance vs. form.
Since I’ve always only looked at things from the perspective of my personal spiritual journey, I’ve never kept a written record of my comparative studies and development of my conclusions.
This means there is no concrete set of details I can list for anyone, to prove my position to them. I consider this actually to be important for me not to do - for the reason of avoiding getting stuck in semantic details of form, to the detriment of realizing the actual substance of Truth.
But to get back to your question, because I see the essential substance of Jesus’ teachings to be also the essential substance of Hinduism and Buddhism, there is no question of Hinduism having the right to have a view of Jesus within itself. He is automatically there by the Truth of his very nature.
From the perspective of superficial followers of external form - well that’s another issue entirely. I don’t find that area particularly fruitful spiritually, although I certainly can (at times) appreciate that view as far as it goes for its own sake. (rituals, etc.). And there are plenty of examples of specific individuals using ritual as a vehicle and going far beyond it to Truth itself - Catholic and non-Christian alike.