R
Rence
Guest
Can’t leave you alone for a minute :nope:Check out my other threads and you’ll see how my days has been.
But if your attractive, sure why not?!
![]()
But here’s your hug for your bad day :console:
Can’t leave you alone for a minute :nope:Check out my other threads and you’ll see how my days has been.
But if your attractive, sure why not?!
![]()
Thanks hun! Sorry! Didn’t mean to fool around on you!Can’t leave you alone for a minute :nope:
But here’s your hug for your bad day :console:
does not matter what I think. the priest knows you, I don’tI talked to a priest friend of mine, and he said he wouldn’t like me to
…
What do you think?
I think I need a program to keep track of the CAF cast bios these days…Can’t leave you alone for a minute :nope:
But here’s your hug for your bad day :console:
I like what you say here although I do like the books. I find the books better than the films. Some just go looking for sometime to find wrong with and hopefully "‘sinful.’No, it’s perfectly fine to read it. Remember that people with too much time on their hands and an interest in bullying others and telling them what to do can make virtually anything sound sinful.
I’m not a fan of the books, I tried reading the first but couldn’t get into it. Having said that, I’m not stupid or biased against them. Read away.
I agree. Then children should not read fairy tales either.What’s so harmful of a child pretending to be a wizard, a vampire, or an owl?
Do you think children are going to grow up thinking they’re still an owl?
Lemon & Lime, Rence and you have made my day.Thanks hun! Sorry! Didn’t mean to fool around on you!
Whoops! Busted!
Hey-what about me?! Didn’t I make your day too?!Lemon & Lime, Rence and you have made my day.![]()
That would be the ‘you’ in my post.Hey-what about me?! Didn’t I make your day too?!
![]()
I agree.I’d ask some of the same questions asked above about whether you are firmly situated in reality.
If so, then the Harry Potter books have a fundamentally good perspective on Christian morality and choices, even from book 1: Harry has to consider whom to be faithful to (his friends), and Ron, for example, sacrifices himself in the chess game.
They also show that special powers (magic) are not fundamentally different from other human abilities. Whatever we can do, there is the question of how we will use it, for good or for evil.
As for enticing people into Wicca, I suppose it’s possible. But where would you buy an authentic wand (with a unicorn hair or griffon feather), and a book of spells that work on the “point-speak-and-shoot” principle? None of my Latin does that. (Maybe it’s that knock-off wand I bought?)
If a person has a good sense of reality, reading these books would be no worse than any other fantasy–or any fiction.
I just noticed that!! Sorry! Sometimes I wonder if I’d notice if my house was on fire!That would be the ‘you’ in my post.![]()
Actually, yes, you can sin without intending to. Sin is objective, not subjective. It is an offense against God and his moral law. However, lack of intention greatly diminishes a person’s culpability.…
No, it isn’t. Can you sin without intending to?
1859 Mortal sin requires full knowledge and complete consent. It presupposes knowledge of the sinful character of the act, of its opposition to God’s law. It also implies a consent sufficiently deliberate to be a personal choice. Feigned ignorance and hardness of heart133 do not diminish, but rather increase, the voluntary character of a sin.
1860 Unintentional ignorance can diminish or even remove the imputability of a grave offense. But no one is deemed to be ignorant of the principles of the moral law, which are written in the conscience of every man. The promptings of feelings and passions can also diminish the voluntary and free character of the offense, as can external pressures or pathological disorders. Sin committed through malice, by deliberate choice of evil, is the gravest.
vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s1c1a8.htm1862 One commits venial sin when, in a less serious matter, he does not observe the standard prescribed by the moral law, or when he disobeys the moral law in a grave matter, but without full knowledge or without complete consent.