S
spn82756
Guest
Thanks for the link. The posts from planten are almost comical.You should have been around Jan 2, '09 when he posted,
Thanks for the link. The posts from planten are almost comical.You should have been around Jan 2, '09 when he posted,
I’m sure you remember this example of what transpired before [for new posters: as you read it, ask yourself if it sounds familiar]:What are you talking about, sedonaman. That’s clearly a post made up by Catholics to tarnish planten’s name. Why, you even had someone sign on with the exact same name as planten and had him post…![]()
But I do not remember any samaan. It must be some made up person to malign me now.
Exactly, Sedonaman. I can claim to the be king of England and maybe even convince some people who don’t know who the real king of England is, but that won’t make me right.We must then ask, “Who says Muhammad is the messenger of Allah?” and then who told it to that person and keep asking all the way back in time until we finally must ask who was the first person to say, “Muhammad is the messenger of Allah” ?
So, who was it? Answer: Who but Mohammed?
First off, thanks for showing that Mohammed, (or Allah) have no idea what Christians believe regarding the trinity, for the five millionth time.A lot of misinformation (or disinformation) is purposely being spread against islam in this thread. It is being told that Muslims are guilty of Shirk, by kissing the black stone at Ka’abah. Islam in Shirk is no threat to Christianity. So the Islam bashing is off topic too.
I would like to know, since when is kissing some one (or some thing) a case of Shirk?. the christians are kissing their wives. Are they committing Shirk?? The case of Shirk is associating any one with the God almighty which we see clearly amongst the Catholics.
The Jews and the Muslims keep far away from Shirk. Associating any one with God is strictly forbidden. But christians have got many Lords. They give much importance to the apostles as if they were Gods. Not only is Jesus their great Lord and God but his followers too. They have entered their words (books) into the bible. That is Shirk.
Now about the name of Muhammad in the Kalimah. It is necessary. When one says “There is no god but Allah.” any one can ask “who told that?” Then it is necessary to tell the name of the prophet. That “Muhammad is the messenger of Allah.”
The second part of the Kalimah is as important as the first part. It means that Muhammad is a mere messenger of Allah and he has brought the message “There is no god but Allah.”. The name of Muhammad is essential in telling the source of the imporatnt message.
It was same with the christians too.Jesus told them to preach in the name of the Father and the son (and the holy ghost) in Mathew. Just look at the name of the Father (God) and the son (The messenger of God, Jesus).It is exactly the same thing as in Islam. The two (God and messenger ) are there in the bible.
Jesus told the followers the right thing, to preach in the name of the father and the son and the holy ghost. i.e. God and the messenger and the holy spirit. But the christians made the son and the holy ghost into gods. Is that not Shirk?? It is a great shirk and a great sin.
I had to write all that to make it clear to you that your accusations of Islam are not correct.You yourself are actually involved in Shirk. If there is only One God then why do you talk about three (gods). Then you have to run back to One god too. Trinity is a Shirk and Shirk will never be forgiven by God.
I know you will get very upset. But you should also not write the bad things about islam too. We Muslims have the right to clear up all your accusations and to point your defects to you.
The name of Muhammad in the Kalimah ( There is no God except Allah and Muhammad is a messenger of Allah) is very important. It says that Muhammad is not god. he is a messenger of God. If it was not there, the Muslims may have made Muhammad a god like did the christians. It stops us from making a god of Muhammad. It stops us from Shirk (paganism).
You have your Trinity. If it is not Shirk then what it is?? Ask the Muslim world. Ask the Jews.From Nine_Two:
Depends. The Muslim are certainly guilty of their own concept of Shirk, which they equate with worship, both towards Mohammed and the Kaba. I remember seeing Mohammeds hair (I think it was facial hair) venerated as we would venerate a saint when I was in Konya
In many ways, what you highlight is the difference between Western civilization with a foundation built upon Christianity and a vastly different civilization that hasn’t progressed much since the time of Muhammad except during periods of Westernization.Another reason for taking subjects that a person isn’t particularly interested in is to exercise the brain. Use it or lose it. Could it be that the young people are more frustrated with their own lives because they learn no useful trade to raise themselves up and use every excuse they can think of to be Jihadists so they can hopefully die and get a free pass into their heaven? I think so. They blame the West, they blame the Jews, they blame everyone else for their own failures.
I don’t see that same exercising of the brain in Islamic countries where hours upon hours of Koranic study is the only thing that the kids learn. If a kid is poor in memorization but would have been good in science, math or literature that avenue is not open to that kid. They learn the Koran in a language not their own so most don’t know the trash that is in it.
I don’t discount that there are a lot of Muslims who are very intelligent but will never get the opportunity to be anything other than useless robots.
Take a look at the difference of what over a billion people have produced vs what a few million have produced between 1980 and 2000. Remember that those few million have to keep on defending themselves against the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians and Hezbollah so are not totally free to pursue intellectual pursuits at times.
Now wouldn’t it be grand that over a billion people would wake up and realize that killing and being killed, persecuting and hating others just because they are not Muslims is a total waste of time? All those billions just wasting away in some perverted mind thought. We could be reaching the far corners of outer space, creating ways to help humans have a better quality of life, or curing diseases and making our planet a good place for both human beings and animals. Instead they are held down by some perverted prophet and his idea of an Allah that is just wrong.
Sounds like pacifist peace making verbage…rather than Catholic…which would encourage the faithful to pray for the conversion of those that are against the Catholic Church. I was a Quaker for many years and know your language…of keep in dialogue. I say keep in prayer and watch out for those who push you in to thinking staying in touch verbally is what it is all about. Read Catherine of Sienna regarding this. Your goal is world peace. If you think you are so smooth with dialogue that you can overcome the ones against what you believe in…I will pray for you and hope you are right. God bless you.I am praying for the Christians here who have strength to carry on…and dialogue with others…
sedonaman, you have raised quite an interesting (off topic) question, about who told Muhammad that he was the messenger of Allah. Of course it was Allah who told him that through the agency of an angel. That question is answered.We must then ask, “Who says Muhammad is the messenger of Allah?” and then who told it to that person and keep asking all the way back in time until we finally must ask who was the first person to say, “Muhammad is the messenger of Allah” ?
So, who was it? Answer: Who but Mohammed?
Jesus IS GOD so no one had to “tell” Him, but God revealed Him as His Son at both His Baptism (Matthew 3:13-17 and Mark 1:9-11 and Luke 3:21-22 and John 1:32-34) and at His Transfiguration (Matthew 17:1-8 and Mark 9:1-8). These events were witnessed by many people including John the Baptist and Jesus’ Apostles.sedonaman, you have raised quite an interesting (off topic) question, about who told Muhammad that he was the messenger of Allah. Of course it was Allah who told him that through the agency of an angel. That question is answered.
Now we must seriously try to understand: Who told Jesus that he was the son of God?? Did his **mother **tell him?? Please think over that line too and make us wise about your beliefs. Thanks. A good or the best correct answer is needed from you, supported by your bibleNT.
You have raised this subject. I do not mind if all christians here try to help sedonaman in this matter of " Who told Jesus that he was the son of God?? Did he make it (took it) up himself?? Please tell.
I recently posted this on a similar thread. I don’t think it can be said any more succinctly. Political correctness does us no service.Jesus IS GOD so no one had to “tell” Him, but God revealed Him as His Son at both His Baptism (Matthew 3:13-17 and Mark 1:9-11 and Luke 3:21-22 and John 1:32-34) and at His Transfiguration (Matthew 17:1-8 and Mark 9:1-8). These events were witnessed by many people including John the Baptist and Jesus’ Apostles.
Now, please provide proof outside the Quran that Muhammad is a messenger of God. Your above statement that Allah told him through the angel does not help, because who else, besides Muhammad, witnessed this supposed revelation from the angel? If my boss comes to me and says the Angel Gabriel appeared to him and revealed that he is a messenger of God, but his message contradicts scripture, should I believe him? By the way he is very trustworthy in business, a very honest man - not known to lie.
I agree that the angel was NOT the Angel Gabriel. Sometimes I wonder how much culpability Khadija and her cousin have in all of this because if I remember correctly, they are ones that suggest to Muhammad that it was the Angel Gabriel that appeared to him. Muhammad himself didn’t know and was terrified until he went home and talked to his wife and her cousin.I recently posted this on a similar thread. I don’t think it can be said any more succinctly. Political correctness does us no service.
To me the argument is simple.
The Angel Gabriel announced to Mary that she would have the Son of the Most High. That Jesus would be His Name and that he would save the world from their sins. Gabriel told Mary that Jesus…the baby she would have…is God Incarnate. The Word made flesh.
**Then 600 years later…the same angel gabriel told mohammed that Jesus isn’t God. Now…who has the most to gain from the denial of Jesus? It’s clear. Satan! That is who mohammad’s gabriel was. Satan…a wolf dressed in sheep’s clothing. Look at how many people have been lead astray. Look at how many souls lost. **