T
TrueLight
Guest
[Here it is](Can you give that link?
Now that I look at it again, it is not as bad as I remember, but it’s not a glowing endorsement, either.
[Here it is](Can you give that link?
The Cardinal definitely favors the Novus Ordo Mass over the Tridentine Mass, but as you say, he is not exactly condemning the Tridentine Mass, either. I would have to disagree with him that the only reason people go to the TLM over the NO is because of the abuses in the NO. But that’s for another thread.[Here it is]():
Now that I look at it again, it is not as bad as I remember, but it’s not a glowing endorsement, either.
Well said, Edwin. Even as a Catholic, let me just reiterate how consistently impressed I am by your posts - by their specificity, charity, and intellectual precision and honesty. I really honestly consider you, JReducation, and Marduk to be my all-time favorite posters on these forums.There are not many paths to salvation. There is one path, which no human beings understand fully, but which the Catholic Church claims (reasonably, in my opinion) to be set forth without actual error in its official teachings and practices. You are caricaturing and misrepresenting what I am saying. I would like to have a real conversation with you, but you seem to prefer talking to the stereotype of a Protestant that exists in your own head.
Edwin
There is ambiguity on the matter; you’re certainly right. I think it’s good that there’s ambiguity, though, since this is a matter for prudential judgment.A trad sent me that video because I sing with Protestants once a month.
Oh well. Pray for me.
What I didn’t say is that Cardinal Arinze also has a video where he doesn’t speak too highly of the TLM.
What is confusing is pre-conciliar documents versus post Vat II documents.
I would like to see a more clear statement as well.
I can see where a Catholic attending a Protestant service once a month can be confusing, but it wouldn’t be confusing for someone like me, who came from that environment.
Henry VIII couldn’t have done it alone. There were enough people of power with Protestant tendencies in England - like Thomas Cranmer - to make it work; otherwise, he couldn’t have gotten away with it. So it actually is a little more complex than the Henry VIII card is willing to convey. I’m not saying the origins of the Church of England aren’t embarrassing, but nonetheless it wasn’t all about Henry’s divorce. That was just the event that let it happen.Yes, a series of very complex events…ie they broke away because King Henry VIII put his personal pleasures ahead of God and then the rest of the family followed suit and now the CoE is virtually unrecognizable from its original “Catholic church without a Pope” form. Very complex indeed! Odd how modernism really distorts Catholic teaching and continues to bend and twist it, even though its really unchangeable.
Your opinion would seem to conflict with that of Fr. Serpa, as I posted earlier:I personally think you’re fine in singing with Protestants occasionally, TrueLight - especially since you came from that environment.
The principle that we shouldn’t imply with our actions that Protestant services are equal to the Holy Mass is a good one, but the way some too-stringent Catholics apply it is a little ridiculous: occasional attendance and participation really doesn’t convey that message.
I think we should all listen to Edwin and thereby realize that Catholics often mistakenly send a message that’s equally bad - namely, that Protestants are not Christians. As he put it, that’s at least as disastrous and scandalous a misconception.
Actually, Henry VIII’s divorce was the origin of the Church of England. King Henry VIII had no problems theologically with the Catholic Church, he even had a great devotion to Mary, unlike the Protestants. He broke from the Pope because the Pope would not annul his marriage. No other reason. And no, he didn’t do it alone. All Catholic bishops, with one exception, went along with him.Henry VIII couldn’t have done it alone. There were enough people of power with Protestant tendencies in England - like Thomas Cranmer - to make it work; otherwise, he couldn’t have gotten away with it. So it actually is a little more complex than the Henry VIII card is willing to convey. I’m not saying the origins of the Church of England aren’t embarrassing, but nonetheless it wasn’t all about Henry’s divorce. That was just the event that let it happen.
So how would you describe the Pope’s actions in attending Anglican Evensong, and The Archbishop of England and Wales attending a Anglican Sung Eucharist then?Your opinion would seem to conflict with that of Fr. Serpa, as I posted earlier:
To participate in a heretical worship service and especially a communion service can be sinful for a Catholic because such an act is an affirmation of what we believe to be untrue.
I guess Fr. Serpa and Cardinal Arinze are both “a little ridiculous”?
So how would you describe the Pope’s actions in attending Anglican Evensong, and The Archbishop of England and Wales attending a Anglican Sung Eucharist then?
I can’t speak for what the pope does. I do know that it is an extremely rare event when the Pope attends non-Catholic services. And it is quite telling that the Pope did not allow inter-religious prayer services just recently at Assisi.
And then please set out where in the Church’s teachings or offical documents it says it is forbidden to pray with protestants. Since when did we decide that tv clips from Youtube had any sort of authority- and even if they did the words that Fr Serpa uses are hardly decisive.
I have given you two statements from two very respected clergy in the church and you choose to ignore them. That is your choice, but it does not make your reasoning sound.
This says absolutely nothing about Catholics attending Protestant services and certainly does not contradict Fr. Serpa or Cardinal Arinze. Entering into dialogue does not constitute common worship services. Certainly we have beliefs in common with the Protestants. The Protestants got those beliefs from the Catholic church. But that does not nullify their heretical beliefs (e.g., rejection of the Eucharist).Common Declaration of the Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and Pope Benedict XVI
The Vatican, 23 November 2007
Forty years ago, our predecessors, Pope Paul VI and Archbishop Michael Ramsey, met together in this city sanctified by the ministry and the blood of the Apostles Peter and Paul. They began a new journey of reconciliation based on the Gospels and the ancient common traditions. Centuries of estrangement between Anglicans and Catholics were replaced by a new desire for partnership and co-operation, as the real but incomplete communion we share was rediscovered and affirmed. Pope Paul VI and Archbishop Ramsey undertook at that time to establish a dialogue in which matters which had been divisive in the past might be addressed from a fresh perspective with truth and love.
Since that meeting, the Roman Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion have entered into a process of fruitful dialogue, which has been marked by the discovery of significant elements of shared faith and a desire to give expression, through joint prayer, witness and service, to that which we hold in common. Over thirty-five years, the Anglican - Roman Catholic International Commission (ARCIC) has produced a number of important documents which seek to articulate the faith we share. In the ten years since the most recent Common Declaration was signed by the Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury, the second phase of ARCIC has completed its mandate, with the publication of the documents The Gift of Authority (1999) and Mary: Grace and Hope in Christ (2005). We are grateful to the theologians who have prayed and worked together in the preparation of these texts, which await further study and reflection.
True ecumenism goes beyond theological dialogue; it touches our spiritual lives and our common witness. As our dialogue has developed, many Catholics and Anglicans have found in each other a love for Christ which invites us into practical co-operation and service. This fellowship in the service of Christ, experienced by many of our communities around the world, adds a further impetus to our relationship.
This is a quote from the Anglican-Roman Catholic Commission and there are similar documents with he other Protestant denominations. I have highlighted the section in bold which refers to joint prayer. Funnily nothing about hereticism here!!![]()
This is like the blind leading the partially sighted! I’ll will await with interest any official docments or references from Canon Law forbidding attendence at protestant services.This says absolutely nothing about Catholics attending Protestant services and certainly does not contradict Fr. Serpa or Cardinal Arinze. Entering into dialogue does not constitute common worship services. Certainly we have beliefs in common with the Protestants. The Protestants got those beliefs from the Catholic church. But that does not nullify their heretical beliefs (e.g., rejection of the Eucharist).
Before Vatican II, it was not permitted for Catholics to attend protestant services. From an article by Father Thomas Crean:This is like the blind leading the partially sighted! I’ll will await with interest any official docments or references from Canon Law forbidding attendence at protestant services.
I go there to sing.The Catholic Mass is the re-presentation of our Lord’s Sacrifice on Calvary, the Sacrifice that is the salvation of the world, both physically and spiritually. This cannot be found anywhere else on earth. Why do you want to go to a poor facsimile of that, so empty and cold compared to the great Sacrifice of the Mass?
I personally prefer and thank God that I can be where the real action is.![]()
Join a choir? Your continual attendance at a Protestant worship service is scandalous. How can you witness to these Protestants if you attend their services even if it’s under the auspices of “just to sing”? Much like I think, they would be saying “well, why isnt she in a choir, yeah she must actually want to be protestant!”.I go there to sing.
No it’s not scandalous.Join a choir? Your continual attendance at a Protestant worship service is scandalous. How can you witness to these Protestants if you attend their services even if it’s under the auspices of “just to sing”? .
Thank you for the suggestion.True Light,
NewsTheMan raises a good point. Why not just join a choir? There are plenty of choirs in the style of which you are accustomed to. I do know that you enjoy the EF but you get go to a NO that one day a month instead.
Henry was the head of the Church of England. He isn’t any more. Nor has any English monarch after Edward VI held that title, I believe.Edwin, the head of the Church of England felt the same exact way about Protestants that the Catholic church feels up until he wanted annulment after annulment. This is why man must be humble…
I mentioned you in one post because one poster said no one here is advocating going to protestant services on a regular basis, and you said that is exactly what you are doing. You should not have brought the subject up if you did not want it to be discussed, and doing so, you should have realized that most Catholics would not be in favor of attending Protestant services. You should also realize why most Catholics are not in favor of it. You have now seen my posts about Cardinal Arinze, Father Serpa and my other posts showing that Catholics should not be attending Protestant services. You need to decide if God is talking to you or not. You are brand new in the church. Going back to what you came out of doesn’t seem to bode well.No it’s not scandalous.
I sing in a choir. That is why I am there once a month. And I’m not soaking up anything as this is the Church I used to attend. I know very well what it’s about.
How can I be a witness? I’ll tell you.
People are marveling that I converted to Catholicism. In fact, one woman, who was baptized Catholic, and has sort of longed to go and at least try a mass, is interested in coming along with her husband (a baptized Catholic who doesn’t attend church at all), to try a Latin mass.
Yes, I am a witness by just the fact of my conversion. My friends are constantly asking me about Catholicism.
You don’t have to agree with me.
I asked my traditional priest and although he didn’t like it, he said the Church does not forbid it. He told me to pray about it and ask for an answer from God. That’s whose advice I’ll take.
That matters more to me than your judgmental cries of scandalous.
Really, there is a way to speak to someone in charity.
Can you and Acatholic please move on to the next post, because I do not want to be the focus of this thread.
Thank you!![]()
Well, I’d like to think it’s because Protestants are brothers and sisters in Christ, albeit only in imperfect communion with the Church.Why would you want to pray with prodestants paxvobus?
The view maintained by some on this forum is that this “prayer in common” should not consist of participation in the regular worship of Protestants. But there’s no doubt that the Catholic Church calls for its faithful to pray together with Protestants.Certain things are required in order to respond adequately to this call. . . .
- prayer in common, because “change of heart and holiness of life, along with public and private prayer for the unity of Christians, should be regarded as the soul of the whole ecumenical movement, and merits the name 'spiritual ecumenism;”'282
-fraternal knowledge of each other;283