M
Mikaele
Guest
And if so, then what makes alcohol and cigarettes alright?
Not true. Certain things are immoral because they are illegal. It is of course true that just because something is legal it is not always moral. However, it is not correct that legality “plays no part” in assessing morality.First, a reminder (which you may already know): the legality of an act plays no part in it’s morality. .
Perhaps I wasn’t clear; using the term “legality” was misleading. Indeed, my intent was to emphasize that legal does not determine moral. Illegal does play some part in morality, as you say. Thanks for helping me be clear.Not true. Certain things are immoral because they are illegal. It is of course true that just because something is legal it is not always moral. However, it is not correct that legality “plays no part” in assessing morality.
Don’t really have an opinion about the legality of marijuana, but as I mentioned before, I would contend that there IS harm done to the one using marijuana - perhaps not physical harm, but certainly spiritual harm.But as long as they are doing it privately, and not harming themselves or others? Legalize it.![]()
If it is habitual, and over done, I can agree that would cause spiritual harm. You can say the same about Alchohol can you not?Perhaps I wasn’t clear; using the term “legality” was misleading. Indeed, my intent was to emphasize that legal does not determine moral. Illegal does play some part in morality, as you say. Thanks for helping me be clear.
Don’t really have an opinion about the legality of marijuana, but as I mentioned before, I would contend that there IS harm done to the one using marijuana - perhaps not physical harm, but certainly spiritual harm.
Alcohol can be habitual while remaining harmless - assuming it is not over done. Not so sure the same can be said about marijuana. Certainly if over done, it is harmful. But I’m not sure it needs to be habitual to be harmful.If it is habitual, and over done, I can agree that would cause spiritual harm. You can say the same about Alchohol can you not?![]()
Every one of your arguments can be used about alchohol as well. Try again.Alcohol can be habitual while remaining harmless - assuming it is not over done. Not so sure the same can be said about marijuana. Certainly if over done, it is harmful. But I’m not sure it needs to be habitual to be harmful.
Any time you alter your perception, you invite actions on temptations. Inhibitions are lowered; clear, rational thinking deteriorates; the occasion of sin escalates. I never experimented with drugs (including marijuana), thus I am admittedly not the best to weigh in on this. But my understanding is that a “casual” marijuana smoker does not typically engage in smoking without experiencing something akin to drunkenness. Perhaps you know more about this. Are typical marijuana users just “relaxing” with a few puffs here and there, with very little affect on perception, much like a person who engages in one or two small drinks?
I have smoked marijuana in the past and would never do it again, but I truly believe it is something that could be done in moderation for medicinal purposes or as a means of relaxation. There are similar things people do like drink kava and smoke flavoured tobacco, which in themselves have absolutely no benefit to one’s health but are good for social purposes and relaxation. I don’t see how marijuana can be different, they all have the same effect, and they can all be abused and become very addictive.
actually marijuana has neuroprotective effects! and if you use it in food recipes or use a vaporizer, you eliminate the harmful effects of smoking!Alcohol can be habitual while remaining harmless - assuming it is not over done. Not so sure the same can be said about marijuana. Certainly if over done, it is harmful. But I’m not sure it needs to be habitual to be harmful.
I like that. Any proof?actually marijuana has neuroprotective effects! and if you use it in food recipes or use a vaporizer, you eliminate the harmful effects of smoking!
M. Van der Stelt et al. 2001. Neuroprotection by delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol, the main active compound in marijuana, against ouabain-induced in vivo excitotoxicity. The Journal of Neuroscience 21: 6475-6479; J. Joy et al. 1999. Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base.I like that. Any proof?![]()
It may be on your level!M. Van der Stelt et al. 2001. Neuroprotection by delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol, the main active compound in marijuana, against ouabain-induced in vivo excitotoxicity. The Journal of Neuroscience 21: 6475-6479; J. Joy et al. 1999. Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base.
i’ll have to look harder for specific studies on the smoking thing, i forget where that was. although its common sense