1
1voice
Guest
I never implied that he wasntThe Lord is our Shepherd.
Form/rules minus peace/ love…What do you define as religious?
I never implied that he wasntThe Lord is our Shepherd.
Form/rules minus peace/ love…What do you define as religious?
I never suggested you did not. Was there some event in particular that caused your egress?I never implied that he wasnt
Form/rules minus peace/ love…
No particular event. Just a long slow buildup of frustration with lifeless wrote religious patterns that repeated over and over. Life in those years was just a matter of going through ingrained religious motions minus joy. Minus peace. Minus … life.I never suggested you did not. Was there some event in particular that caused your egress?
Your testimony is interesting, the experience of many Catholics, I have discovered. Many stay with the Church because of deep emotional ties, family ties, simpler to remain Catholic, etc., but they find little in the weekly Mass that seems to them more form than substance. Repetitious liturgy that cane seem empty. Millions drift away, often from religion entirely, but many to various expressions of Protestantism. Some crave a freedom to think 'outside the box' without feeling constraints of a hierarchy (that is where i have had a major problem). Others become fundamentalost Protestants who seem to replace one restrictive authority for another.
On the other hand, there are others (I also have discovered) who have a particular love and reverence for the Mass. "Different strokes for different folks."
Over the years, I have come to believe that God respects all humans who sincerely seek to worship him, who stand in awe before the Lord's magnificent creation, and who try their best to live by the precepts taught in the Sermon on the Mount. As for doctrine and liturgy, if they promote this form of faith, fine. People should embrace whatever faith helps provide them with assurance, peace, intellectual integrity, and especially love for God and one another.
God bless all of those who seek to follow him, whatever their creed, color, culture or country,
It seems to me that you never formed a friendship with God. You kept Him at a distance, and like anything that is a ways off, it eventually just means nothing. I can tell you that the Lord is my closest friend. If I have a need, I turn to Him. If something good, no matter how small, comes my way, I thank Him. Can’t say how many times a day I tell Him I love Him. I am truly very grateful for His love and friendship. I am continually amazed at how much He yearns to be a part of my life. If I entered the ‘dark night of the soul’ and felt no contact with God, it would be unbearable. I rely on knowing He’s right there with me. Have you talked to Him lately? It’s never too late. His love for you is as strong as for any of His children. Being God – being perfect – He can have no favorites. Why punish yourself by staying away?I dont know… You tell me… I followed the rules. Went to Catholic school. Mass once a week. … was an alter boy … knew the responses in Latin … Earned my Ad Altare Dei pin in the Boy Scouts…
I have a large extended Catholic family. I respect their expression of faith and love them dearly.1Voice
Code:Your testimony is interesting, the experience of many Catholics, I have discovered. Many stay with the Church because of deep emotional ties, family ties, simpler to remain Catholic, etc., but they find little in the weekly Mass that seems to them more form than substance. Repetitious liturgy that cane seem empty. Millions drift away, often from religion entirely, but many to various expressions of Protestantism. Some crave a freedom to think 'outside the box' without feeling constraints of a hierarchy (that is where i have had a major problem). Others become fundamentalost Protestants who seem to replace one restrictive authority for another. On the other hand, there are others (I also have discovered) who have a particular love and reverence for the Mass. "Different strokes for different folks." Over the years, I have come to believe that God respects all humans who sincerely seek to worship him, who stand in awe before the Lord's magnificent creation, and who try their best to live by the precepts taught in the Sermon on the Mount. As for doctrine and liturgy, if they promote this form of faith, fine. People should embrace whatever faith helps provide them with assurance, peace, intellectual integrity, and especially love for God and one another. God bless all of those who seek to follow him, whatever their creed, color, culture or country,
God bless you for your concern.It seems to me that you never formed a friendship with God. You kept Him at a distance, and like anything that is a ways off, it eventually just means nothing. I can tell you that the Lord is my closest friend. If I have a need, I turn to Him. If something good, no matter how small, comes my way, I thank Him. Can’t say how many times a day I tell Him I love Him. I am truly very grateful for His love and friendship. I am continually amazed at how much He yearns to be a part of my life. If I entered the ‘dark night of the soul’ and felt no contact with God, it would be unbearable. I rely on knowing He’s right there with me. Have you talked to Him lately? It’s never too late. His love for you is as strong as for any of His children. Being God – being perfect – He can have no favorites. Why punish yourself by staying away?
But the religious pattern that you mention is the Mass. The Mass is our offering bread and wine and ourselves to the Lord, and His changing the bread and wine into Himself and giving Himself to us. How can that ever become humdrum? I think we tend to forget what is really happening at the Mass. It’s a wonderful miracle, and it’s ours for the asking.God bless you for your concern.
I have found what you describe. I briefly point to that in the post above.
I just never found it in the monotony of religious patterns that just seemed to drone on for year after year…
Sounds like you judge people from the standpoint of religious bigotry alone. Do you have even a smidgen of evidence that Catholics die with a smile on their faces while Protestants die with gloomy faces? Wild assertion! I've had relatives of both expressions of the Christian faith and they all seemed to face death with assurance.
I'm quite sure that people who are devout believers in God - Catholic, Protestant, or Orthodox - are blessed in the world to come. The love of God extends to them all, and even beyond them.
Why don't we agree to avoid such prejudice based on a form of irrational tribal loyalty rather than any proof?
God bless Catholics, Protestants, and all of his beloved children, whatever their creed, color, culture or country.
:doh2:It is very easy to be a protestant than a catholic. Christ once said that the road to hell is wider and the road to life is narrower. It is very obvious that that road which leads to hell is protestantism. Their teachings are too fragmented, shallow and based on human feelings. Catholicism is stricter and her teachings are based on devine truth. Those people who leave the church do it because they can not cope up with the demands of divine truth.
Genuine catholics always die smiling, whereas protestants die with gloomy faces.
The Protestant way is definitely less demanding. In a real sense, you are your own boss because no one has the authority to dictate anything to another, at least in theory.I’ve been both. For the first 47 years of my life, I was an active and faithful member of various evangelical Protestant churches. In 2004, my husband and I converted to Catholicism, and we’ve been active and faithful Catholics.
So which is easier?
I don’t want to post my opinion yet (mainly because I have to go to work now!). Also, I am interested in reading what others have to say.
On the surface, it seems that Protestantism is the “easier” path. No obligations, no sacraments. For many Protestants, no fear of ever losing heaven. Great music, friendly people, lots of activities for children and teenagers. Lots of activities for all ages, actually.
Catholics have obligations, including the Sunday Mass obligation. Catholics have sacraments. Catholics must avoid “mortal sin” or they will not go to heaven. Catholic music is often bearable, but seldom great. Many Catholic parishes are hard to make friends in. Often there are very limited activities for Catholics–maybe a Bible study, and maybe not. Probably not a weekly kids’ club–instead, the kids get “religious education”–no campfires or craft projects or sing-alongs in CCD! And youth groups–often they are pretty small, because all the Catholic teens are over at the Assemblies of God weekly youth meeting along with hundreds of other teens! Or the Catholic teens have stopped attending Church entirely, to the dismay of their parents.
But is Protestantism really easier? Hmmm…
I encourage anyone to think about and answer this question. Obviously converts to Catholicism have personal experience with both forms of Christianity, but I know a lot of Catholics who have knowledge of Protestant life and practices, too.
I am guessing that it wasn’t your intention to come off as sounding that inflammatory?It is very easy to be a protestant than a catholic. Christ once said that the road to hell is wider and the road to life is narrower. It is very obvious that that road which leads to hell is protestantism. Their teachings are too fragmented, shallow and based on human feelings. Catholicism is stricter and her teachings are based on devine truth. Those people who leave the church do it because they can not cope up with the demands of divine truth.
Genuine catholics always die smiling, whereas protestants die with gloomy faces.
**"However, one cannot charge with the sin of the separation those who at present are born into these communities [that resulted from such separation] and in them are brought up in the faith of Christ, and the Catholic Church accepts them with respect and affection as brothers . . . . All who have been justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians, and with good reason are accepted as brothers in the Lord by the children of the Catholic Church."272
Roy, I’ve read most of your posts on this thread. You seem to place a lot of emphasis on what you call “independent thinking” and freedom from authority like the Church, the bible, the church fathers and anything not you. This has lead you to stances like pro-choice and pro-abortion, and the idea that moral law is a burden on people which you compared to shariah- which is actually a false comparison, shariah is a combination of mosque and state and nothing like the moral obligations that Christians and Muslims follow in their daily lives, far removed from any political authority.Your testimony is interesting, the experience of many Catholics, I have discovered. Many stay with the Church because of deep emotional ties, family ties, simpler to remain Catholic, etc., but they find little in the weekly Mass that seems to them more form than substance. Repetitious liturgy that cane seem empty. Millions drift away, often from religion entirely, but many to various expressions of Protestantism. Some crave a freedom to think ‘outside the box’ without feeling constraints of a hierarchy (that is where i have had a major problem). Others become fundamentalost Protestants who seem to replace one restrictive authority for another.
**We seem to be so far apart that it's difficult to engage**. For example, I do not take the story of Adam and Eve literally. I believe it is a parable. In fact, much in the Bible I do not take literally as I believe it conflicts with the spirit of Christ. In his Sermon on the Mount he said several times: "Ye have heard it said, but I say unto you...." I go with Jesus rather than the Old Testament.
**For example, do you believe Ex. 22:18 and 20, that witches should be killed and all those who are of another faith should be exterminated?** Do you believe II Kings 2:23-25 - that after Elisha 'called down a curse on them (youth) in the name of the Lord' two bears mauled 42 young people? I mean, give me a break. Do you believe that God commanded Joshua to slaughter the inhabitants of Jericho or ordered Saul to kill every remaining man, woman, child and suckling among the Amalekites!? Really, how can one worship any god who demanded such genocide? How can we oppose abortion (which I do, by the way, except in very few and extreme situations) and believe such vile slanders directed against God?
**Back to Adam for a moment. **Kierkegaard, the great Danish theologian, pointed something out. If Adam and Eve could not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, how could they known good from evil? Perhaps the command from God made no sense if they did not have such knowledge. In any case, I believe that God is just and we all would not be infected with original sin because Adam sinned. That's like blaming our great-geat-grandchildren for our failings. That, by the way, is a flaw in the Ten Commandments. Recheck Ex. 20:4-5. Etc.
** We could go on and on, but believe as you will, and I will do the same.** My concern with Christianity, over many years now, is that the message of Christ be not overshadowed by superstitions and paganism. Sorry if this thought offends you. In Matt. 25he quite clearly gives us the recipe for eternal life (along with the parable of the Good Samaritan). It has little to do with proper doctrine or liturgy. It has everything to do with serving God through serving one another. Faith, hope and love, and the greatest of these is love. I find insistence upon correct dogma and precise patterns of worship contrary to the spirit of Jesus, a special friend to the outcast, the pariahs, and all those who took issue with the established religion of that time.
** As to the thread, there are at least two ways of answering the question. ** (1) If one wants to think for himself - condemned as egotistical apparently by some - liberal Protestantism is easier, as it permits this. Not fundamentalist Protestantism, by the way, which also can be very authoritative. (2) If one wants to be told what to believe, a source of comfort and security for millions, Catholicism is easier because it does that. Most Catholics I know well, within my family circle and beyond, are more like liberal Protestants than traditional Catholics because, while they often remain firmly within the church, they still think independently. Their cultural and family ties keep them Catholic, although some have left the church.
Roy,** Marybeloved**
** Thank you** for your civil and sincere response to my postings.
** You are content to accept what you are told. Fine. No argument from me.** But I believe God gave us a brain to use. Religion should not be a straitjacket. We should have the freedom to think and investigate and weigh and ponder.Code:**We seem to be so far apart that it's difficult to engage**. For example, I do not take the story of Adam and Eve literally. I believe it is a parable. In fact, much in the Bible I do not take literally as I believe it conflicts with the spirit of Christ. In his Sermon on the Mount he said several times: "Ye have heard it said, but I say unto you...." I go with Jesus rather than the Old Testament. **For example, do you believe Ex. 22:18 and 20, that witches should be killed and all those who are of another faith should be exterminated?** ** In those good old days, Catholic nations often imposed laws not all that unlike Shariah law.** I recall the shock I received when I was reading Aquinas years ago in college. My undergraduate thesis was on Aquinas. I came upon his question-and-answer as to what should be done with heretics. No, he said, the Church should not kill them. BUT, the Church should turn them over to civil authorities who then should kill them! What do you think of that? Sounds like an modern-day wild Islamic radical to me. **Back to Adam for a moment. **Kierkegaard, the great Danish theologian, pointed something out. If Adam and Eve could not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, how could they known good from evil?
God bless you anyway - and God bless everybody - no exceptions. May religion become a bridge rather than a barrier.Code:** We could go on and on, but believe as you will, and I will do the same.** My concern with Christianity, over many years now, is that the message of Christ be not overshadowed by superstitions and paganism. . ** As to the thread, there are at least two ways of answering the question. ** (1) If one wants to think for himself - condemned as egotistical apparently by some - liberal Protestantism is easier, as it permits this. Not fundamentalist Protestantism, by the way, which also can be very authoritative.
- It is well known how highly the Church regards human reason, for it falls to reason to demonstrate with certainty the existence of God, personal and one; to prove beyond doubt from divine signs the very foundations of the Christian faith; to express properly the law which the Creator has imprinted in the hearts of men; and finally to attain to some notion, indeed a very fruitful notion, of mysteries.
- When, however, there is question of another conjectural opinion, namely polygenism, the children of the Church by no means enjoy such liberty. For the faithful cannot embrace that opinion which maintains that either after Adam there existed on this earth true men who did not take their origin through natural generation from him as from the first parent of all, or that Adam represents a certain number of first parents. Now it is in no way apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the Teaching Authority of the Church propose with regard to original sin, which proceeds from a sin actually committed by an individual Adam and which, through generation, is passed on to all and is in everyone as his own.
The Church, in keeping us safe, asks that we know that Reason is good however it is important when using reason to use it with the understanding that it be tempered by Phiosophical understanding as exemplified by Aquinas.
- If one considers all this well, he will easily see why the Church demands that future priests be instructed in philosophy “according to the method, doctrine, and principles of the Angelic Doctor,”[8] since, as we well know from the experience of centuries, the method of Aquinas is singularly preeminent both of teaching students and for bringing truth to light; his doctrine is in harmony with Divine Revelation, and is most effective both for safeguarding the foundation of the faith and for reaping, safely and usefully, the fruits of sound progress.[9]