Is it irreverent to serve the Mass in my underwear?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JD27076
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just sooooo nice to see this thread is still being viewed… …
visitors to this thread hoping someone says something ridiculous like…um…
do you think it was improper that at 3 months old, my mom had me in no underwear ?
At 3 months old I had some serious “issues” and so mom had to change my underwear quite often.:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Just sooooo nice to see this thread is still being viewed… …
visitors to this thread hoping someone says something ridiculous like…um…
do you think it was improper that at 3 months old, my mom had me in no underwear ?
Nah. Improper would be me at 3 years old stripping naked because I didn’t like the clothing put on me then while still naked find something else for me to wear. I’ve been told that the combinations were always hideous.
 
Nah. Improper would be me at 3 years old stripping naked because I didn’t like the clothing put on me then while still naked find something else for me to wear. I’ve been told that the combinations were always hideous.
haha … well I was out in the country on a farm… often naked… when little… but you can’t do that anymore… parents would be sent to jail !
 
haha … well I was out in the country on a farm… often naked… when little… but you can’t do that anymore… parents would be sent to jail !
In my case, they would take pictures… which would probably also result in parents being sent to jail if done now.
 
[NOT A TROLL THREAD]

Let me get this straight, No I did not serve Mass with nothing but my underwear on…

I serve Mass in a cassock and surplice and I make it a goal to get black pants, black socks, and black shoes.
Well today I had gotten all of that, but my pants didn’t fit. I had got the wrong ones.

Well I didn’t want to wear the cassock with jeans. That would look totally tacky.

So what I did is that I went to the altar server changing room, took off my pants, put the cassock over me and put on my long socks and shoes… then put on the surplice.

Nothing was out of the ordinary, everything looked fine.

But was it irreverant (Or even sinful) to wear no pants under the cassock?

Thank you.

(BTW, The cassock belongs to me and me alone*, so no one is going to wear it after me)*

If that’s irreverent, then millions of Franciscan men are burning in hell. We don’t wear pants unless it’s very very cold and then we usually wear blue jeans that stick out from under the habit, with a surplus over the habit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top