Re: Arizona judge–it was a memo sent around the chambers with some demands of words to be avoided by an activist group, but it carried no weight.
Mine is simply an observation in this fiery topic. I have my own views on illegal immigration and how to best deal with the situation. It includes an end to the mythical support from many entities. If the LA diocese was interested in helping the Mexican and Central American population, the Taj Mahoney should have remained St Vibiana’s and the funds diverted to projects that would build communities and industries in the country of origin.The same can be said of the new Oakland cathedral.
****Very astute….did no one discuss the possibilities of this? ****
I hope all who are welcoming illegal activity are reaching deeply into their own pockets to fund projects in counties of origin. The money going to Catholic and other foundations, located in other countries, goes much further than the contributions made to huge bureaucracies here. Of all the remedies for illegal alien"problem", assisting them to build and grow their own nations, seems the most loving and Christian of things to do.
**Again, I agree! But those who tout liberation theology within the Church would have none of this. They have carried their message of helping the poor to include revolutions here, in this country, with an aim of bringing down certain elements of capitalism. To me it is more humanism than social justice. **
In my experience, most illegal aliens who come here to work do not want to be Americans. They are proud Mexican citizens and will become citizens only if they are forced to do so in order to remain. Just as I might travel to Japan to work because it is a lucrative deal, I don’t want to be part of the Empire, and as soon as I have gotten my final check, I’m out of there. Why do we view our Hispanic brothers as less than us?
I am part of a multicultural family, with recent immigrants on both sides. They took their turn in line. They had to provide a sponsor or have sufficient funds to demonstrate they would not be a drain on the economy. They had to have medical and criminal checks. They had to learn the language and history of the US and the Constitution.
**Absolutely right on – our family has immigrants on both sides as well, and although individual cultures were maintained within the family unit, they came here to settle and to meld into everything that comprised the American way of life; they were proud when they became citizens and certainly had to desire to go back to their former countries of origin. **
There are people all over the globe who want to come here. The present wink and nod system of allowing illegal immigrants from a few countries jump the line, by virtue of proximity, is inherently unfair.
I couldn’t agree more! It’s a slap in the face to those who try to do things by the book, but since our current administration (and the new one, I’m just as sure) tends to govern by forming big business partnerships rather than truly representing us, the people, the policy will remain, and I’m certain, that just as he promised, Obama will work to pass an amnesty deal.