G
grannymh
Guest
Thank you for this excellent post.
Apparently, I am too old to handle a younger website. Thus, before this
website’s participants send me into outer space, I am leaving.
Blessings to all. May you find true peace.
grannymh
Each human person is worthy of profound respect.
male/female procreation pair. If A and E involves tens of thousands of people,
then ALL of them must sin in order for the inheritance of the sin effect to be
able to past down the generations. As long as there are possibility of pockets
of non-sinners the idea of OS for all mankind cannot be true because not all
would have sinned the OS as per Paul. Occam’s Razor would point to 2 guilty
persons rather than thousands.
Nevertheless, the science of evolution can not exist. At best it is a theory
only because it is not a testable theory which makes it unscientific. How do you
test evolution? There are serious serious hurdles that is seemingly impossible
to overcome especially for macro-evolution. I am pro-science but I am not
pro-fraud nor pro-omission. It is shameful to do science deceitfully. It is
hypocritical of the pot to market non-science as real science by calling the
kettle black.
Apparently, I am too old to handle a younger website. Thus, before this
website’s participants send me into outer space, I am leaving.
Blessings to all. May you find true peace.
grannymh
Each human person is worthy of profound respect.
The idea of Original Sin must involve 2 persons only and it must be aThe Catholic Church chose the data involving Adam and Eve as the population of
two original fully-human founders of the human species.
male/female procreation pair. If A and E involves tens of thousands of people,
then ALL of them must sin in order for the inheritance of the sin effect to be
able to past down the generations. As long as there are possibility of pockets
of non-sinners the idea of OS for all mankind cannot be true because not all
would have sinned the OS as per Paul. Occam’s Razor would point to 2 guilty
persons rather than thousands.
Nevertheless, the science of evolution can not exist. At best it is a theory
only because it is not a testable theory which makes it unscientific. How do you
test evolution? There are serious serious hurdles that is seemingly impossible
to overcome especially for macro-evolution. I am pro-science but I am not
pro-fraud nor pro-omission. It is shameful to do science deceitfully. It is
hypocritical of the pot to market non-science as real science by calling the
kettle black.
Last edited: