Is Jack Van Impe Right About the Millenium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mo3
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jason:

I truly enjoyed your post. You speak my language! Right to the point…let’s go about our business, leave the END to God, and rest assured in our Faith’s teachings!

Amen! God bless all!
 
Yes he is for the Bible speaks of it very clearly in the book of Mathew ch. 24 vs 1 through vs31 it speaks of the coming tribulation also in the book of Revelation ch.20 talks about satan being bound for a 1000 yrs. also in chs. 15 throught 18 shows God’s judgement on the earth. Another sign of his coming is found in Rev ch.11 about 2 witness and also in the book of Revelation the final temple will be built where the Dome of the Rock now stands, also in the book of Daniel ch.2 it talks about Nebuchadnezzar"s dream and particully vs31 to 45 it speaks of the comming kingdoms of the medes, Greeks Romans , untill the final earthly kingdom the 10 toes of the statue in the kings dream which will be the new Holy Roman Empire which is the comman market . So We can look to the Bible for answers of the second comming of Jesus even thought God does not tell the exact time or hour of his comming we are to be watchfull at his comming amen.
 
Although St. Justin Martyr said that he personally believed in a literal 1000 year reign, he said that there were other Christians who didn’t believe in it. (Dialogue with Trypho, chap. 80)

Eusebius Pamphilus didn’t believe in a literal 1000 years reign. (History of the Church, book 3; chap. 39)
Jack is Catholic friendly but gets everything mixed up. He picks an obscure quote by a Catholic theologian and forms it into his interpretation of Catholic dogma. He’s believable if you have done little study. Some of his errors are:

Jack Van Impe has set many specific years and dates for the second coming of Christ, continually revising his prediction. He recently indicated 2012 as a possible date for the second coming. Van Impe no longer claims to know the specific date of the Second Coming of Christ, but quotes verses which imply that humankind should know when the second coming is near.

Prior to January 1, 2000, Van Impe frequently predicted widespread global catastrophes and destruction resulting from the Y2K problem, which he believed to be a fulfillment of Bible prophecy. He was of course wrong.

Newspaper Prophet, Van Impe has said that he is not a televangelist. “I’m a TV analyst, I analyze the news.” Jack and his wife Rexella give their interpretation on how past and present world events are fulfilling Bible prophecy. He believes the European Union to be the “Restored Roman Empire.” According to him when it reached ten nations it fulfilled Bible prophecy even though today it is much higher than that in member states.

An article in the January-February 1993 issue of Perhaps Today magazine included a detailed chronology to demonstrate that the Lord will probably return in September of 1999:

“Let’s figure that out again–1948.5 plus 51.4 equals 1999.9–around September of the year 1999. Now, we are not date-setters! Of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not he angels of heaven, but my father only (Matthew 24:36). But wait! Don’t say, `No one can know the APPROXIMATE time when Christ will return,’ for Jesus also said in verse 33 that we will know when it is near, even at the doors.”

In the Jan-Feb 1997 issue of Perhaps Today Van Impe claimed that the year 2001 “will see the start of the Great Tribulation. Political chaos, natural disasters, nuclear war and the worldwide rise of Islam will usher in mankind’s final hour.”

In 1998, Van Impe had this to say about the 16th century French mystic Nostradamus;

”Now, Nostradamus said that the king of terror would appear November of 1999. I believe Nostradamus knew his bible and knew what the six-day theory was, and so he could put it all together.” Jack Van Impe Presents October 5, 1998
 
So jack is giving credence to Nostradamus? :confused:

Giving credence to a clarivoyant? :eek:

Nostradamus is so vague what he says can look like being interpreted by many things. (If you are dull enough to want to believe in Nosttradamus of course.)
 
He does get some things right, but is such a flip-flop that he can’t be trusted!
 
This is the same guy who claims when Jesus said "there shall be signs in the Heavens’, that was referring to the moon landing. He also quoted an OT passage relating to ‘chariots of fire’ and claims that refers to automobiles.
Methinks he takes things out of context to suit his own purposes.
One of the purposes fundamentalists have in studying ECFs is to find something that agrees with then so they have more ‘traction’, especially with Catholics who watch his ‘show’.
I have to say this:
I know people think he is ‘sincere’. I’m sorry, he’s not.
The only reason he is no longer anti-Catholic is because of the scores of Catholic little old ladies who watch his program and give money for his propaganda. Half of his program is SELLING his material to Catholics fascinated with ‘end times’ and don’t know their faith well enough to know how to refute the garbage he delivers.
There, my mind is clean.:cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top