J
justasking4
Guest
Do you have chapter and verse for this?It is written that he who rejects his church, rejects him, and that those individuals are to be treated as heathen.
Do you have chapter and verse for this?It is written that he who rejects his church, rejects him, and that those individuals are to be treated as heathen.
i know your church claims this but where do we find such teaching in the scriptures?Yes, Jesus Christ and the Holy **Catholic **Church are the only means of Salvation.
Jesus formulated one plan of salvation and founded one Church. If that is true, then it follows that all other plans are false. The Church is merely declaring that she believes her teachings to be true. Certainly that should be expected of any religion. After all, if you didn’t believe that your teachings were true, why would you believe them?
*But if only the Catholic Church has the complete plan of salvation, how would it be possible for a non-Catholic to get to heaven? Vatican Council II addressed this point in its “Dogmatic Constitution on the Church (Lumen Gentium),” **“Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and, moved by grace, try in their actions to do His will as they know it through the dictates of their conscience *– those too may achieve eternal salvation” (no. 16). **In short,those who are truly unaware of what God requires of them are not held responsible; rather they are judged by what they did with the truth they had.
staycatholic.com/salvation_outside_the_church.htm
Which teaching are you refering to? I want to be sure I answer your question. The teaching that Jesus founded one Church?i know your church claims this but where do we find such teaching in the scriptures?
Originally Posted by Brian MillarWhich teaching are you refering to? I want to be sure I answer your question. The teaching that Jesus founded one Church?
Not at all. She has fulfilled the teaching of Paul:Have you read some of what she believed and practiced?
In her book, Life in the Spirit: Reflections, Meditations, and Prayers, “Mother” Teresa says on pp. 81-82:
“We never try to convert those who receive [aid from Missionaries of Charity] to Christianity but in our work we bear witness to the love of God’s presence and if Catholics, Protestants, Buddhists, or agnostics become for this better men – simply better – we will be satisfied. It matters to the individual what church he belongs to. If that individual thinks and believes that this is the only way to God for her or him, this is the way God comes into their life – his life. If he does not know any other way and if he has no doubt so that he does not need to search then this is his way to salvation.”
Is this is not an example of “relativistic nonsense”?
Certainly not. It seems that most agreed upon the Torah, but after that, there was no defined canon. This is why we see so many disputes between the Sadducees and the Pharisees. We can see that bickering over the "writings’ has been going on long before the Church.Would you agree that a Jew in this time period did know what the inspired-inerrant Scriptures were?
This is a good question. The Church accepted the Scriptures that were used by Jesus and the Apostles (Septuagint) and that collection contained Isaiah and the other prophets. The Sadducees did not accept these books.If this is true why in Luke 4:17 is the book of the prophet Isaiah considered Scripture? See verse 21.
How did they know before the church came into being?
Those who are not anti-Catholic can find it in the scriptures.i know your church claims this but where do we find such teaching in the scriptures?
amen. and if i may add to this, our emotions must be placed under christs authority, otherwise anything goes. ephesians 6:10-20I don’t know which saints you are reading , but this is absolutly not true. While I agree that decisions should not be based wholly on emotion, one must be mindful that God created us with emotion for a purpose,and commands us to love Him with the whole heart, soul, mind and strength. This is not "shallow and superficial, with the emotions or anything else.
Maybe none of the Christian denominations (including Catholic) have the total truth. All we can do as Christians is strive for it.So, then, how many ‘truths’ ARE there? It’s relativistic nonsense, if you ask me. As for the saints, read Mother Teresa’s memoirs. They will give you an idea as to how close she ‘felt’ she was to the Lord.
So you don’t believe 1 Tim. 3:15?Maybe none of the Christian denominations (including Catholic) have the total truth. All we can do as Christians is strive for it.
The concept that the men who wrote them were infallible at the time of writing them did not yet exist. And as someone else mentioned already, the canon of Scripture wasn’t settled at that time - Jews disagreed among themselves about which books were to be read out at the Synagogue, and Temple readings were restricted to the Five Books of Moses (aka the Torah).Don’t you think he would have believed this was the Word of God?
They are in heaven now, though. The reason they didn’t go to Heaven at the time of their deaths was that Heaven had not yet been opened to the human race - that happened at the time of Christ’s Resurrection. At that time, the prophets and all who had been awaiting the Messiah went to Heaven.A non-christian cannot inherit eternal life. Every last one of them dies in their sins.
If Abraham, Moses and the prophets did not go to heaven but went to hell because they did not yet have the gospel, than neither did anyone else outside of the christian faith go to heaven.
Ghandi explicitly rejected the Anglican Church; it’s difficult to know without being God whether this condemns him, or saves him. He was not aware of any other form of Christianity, as far as I can tell.Gandhi, despite his popularity is included in that as well.
No one can enter the Father’s presence when they have sin is what the church has always taught. Therefore heaven (as you say) was closed prior to the grace which came from Jesus by which men could become freed from sin.They are in heaven now, though. The reason they didn’t go to Heaven at the time of their deaths was that Heaven had not yet been opened to the human race - that happened at the time of Christ’s Resurrection. At that time, the prophets and all who had been awaiting the Messiah went to Heaven.
Ghandi explicitly rejected the Anglican Church; it’s difficult to know without being God whether this condemns him, or saves him. He was not aware of any other form of Christianity, as far as I can tell.
But he didn’t go to Hell - he went to the Limbo of the Fathers (which was known to the Jews as “Paradise”) until the coming of Jesus, and then he went to Heaven. It is not possible to get out of Hell, so it was not in Hell that Jesus preached to the dead; it was in the Limbo of the Fathers (Paradise). They ascended from there to Heaven, at the moment of the Resurrection.No one can enter the Father’s presence when they have sin is what the church has always taught. Therefore heaven (as you say) was closed prior to the grace which came from Jesus by which men could become freed from sin.
If a non-christian can inherit grace, than why could not Abraham have inherited grace? If you do not need to believe in Jesus in order to be saved than why did all those righteous people prior to Jesus die in their sins until he preached to them in hell?
If Jesus imparted grace upon those who did not know him so that they could go to heaven, than why on earth did Abraham, our father in faith and one of the most righteous men to ever live, go to hell???
This is true. I don’t actually expect Ghandi to be in Heaven - but it is important to realize that we cannot say that anyone is in Hell, because we simply don’t know that.I know that Gandhi was well-versed in the gospels which he himself saw in Jesus as an example of non-violence and simplicity. I don’t know how familiar he was with catholicism or if he even really knew the difference, but he did know the gospels. Gandhi was also fully aware of Jesus’ claim that one needed to believe in Him in order to come to God, and Gandhi rejected this.
The Catholic Church is NOT a denomination.Maybe none of the Christian denominations (including Catholic) have the total truth. All we can do as Christians is strive for it.
I’m sorry, I can’t speak for Mother Teresa, only for myself.
Not exactly, they went to hell (or ‘sheol’, the abode of the dead, in the hebrew scripture) but they did not suffer final damnation.But he didn’t go to Hell - he went to the Limbo of the Fathers (which was known to the Jews as “Paradise”) until the coming of Jesus, and then he went to Heaven. It is not possible to get out of Hell, so it was not in Hell that Jesus preached to the dead; it was in the Limbo of the Fathers (Paradise). They ascended from there to Heaven, at the moment of the Resurrection.
This is true. I don’t actually expect Ghandi to be in Heaven - but it is important to realize that we cannot say that anyone is in Hell, because we simply don’t know that.