B
batteddy
Guest
Yes, but my point was that liturgical music is by definition set to the** liturgical texts**.It doesn’t matter what the type of music it is, as long as the focus of the song in that genre of music is on God.
The genre is a different issue. If someone wanted to do more “contemporary” settings of the novus ordo texts…I wouldn’t mind.
The real problem is that, too often, the music used ISN’T even “liturgical,” regardless of style or genre, it’s extra-liturgical praise music NOT set to the liturgical texts.
It doesn’t, necessarily, matter what type the music is (though chant and polyphony are traditional and preferrable because they avoid fad-ism) but the focus does NOT just have to be “on God”. It should be a setting of the approved liturgical text, not just some other hymn or religiously-themed song.
Only perhaps at the recessional did the Church ever traditionally have these extra pieces, chosen locally, inserted into the Mass like that. The music, regardless of genre, was always a setting of the approved liturgical antiphon or song for that part of Mass.
They way our “entrance hymn” and “communion hymn” and “offertory song” don’t usually use the prescribed antiphon…but instead inserts some song from the 70’s set to guitar…is to me less a question of the style or instruments or genre…and more a question of the lyrics. There are prescribed liturgical texts for those times, they should be used, and any musical setting should be of the liturgical text. That is the definition of “liturgical” music.
Not all religious music is liturgical. It must be set to the liturgical texts to be so.