Is Mormonism a Polytheistic religion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rock17
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

rock17

Guest
I recently had a conversation and it was brought up that the LDS believe that God has a father and he has a father and one is the god of the other. but only our God is our father and is the God of us. It seems like there are many gods and some are above the other almost making a Greek style mythology with diety fathers having human children. This is not Christian I don’t know what to call it.
 
There are a number of terms for it. One of those terms is henotheism - the belief that there are many gods but we should only worship one of them. This is what Mormons believe. They believe that there is an infinite number of gods, each of whom organized a world where he places his spirit children in physical bodies.

In Mormonism, the inhabitants of any given world worship only the god (their “heavenly father”) that put them on that world. The other gods are of little concern to them.

As an aside, they believe Jesus and the Holy Ghost to be gods as well, but are forbidden to worship them or pray to them even though the Book of Mormon records that the people of the ancient American continent worshipped Jesus. But then, the Book of Mormon does not accurately represent current Mormon doctrines or practices.
 
Correct. Henotheism or any theology that acknowledges more than one god is far outside the Judeo-Christian realm. It is closer to Hinduism than Christianity.
 
:extrahappy:

That’s the quickest Mormon theology thread I’ve seen on CAF! LoL
 
I recently had a conversation and it was brought up that the LDS believe that God has a father and he has a father and one is the god of the other. but only our God is our father and is the God of us. It seems like there are many gods and some are above the other almost making a Greek style mythology with diety fathers having human children. This is not Christian I don’t know what to call it.
Don’t forget the Mormon goddesses (unnamed).
 
Yes, I was a convert to Mormonism at age 21. Served a mission to Taiwan, married in the temple, served many callings including Gospel Essentials teacher, Gospel Doctrines teacher, EQ president and 2nd Counselor in a bishopric.

Left the cult after learning the facts about LDS origins, history and doctrines.
 
The Mormon “Heavenly Father” is an ‘exalted’ man of flesh and bones. All Mormon males can achieve the same status if they practice the Mormon religion and tithe faithfully. They may become gods and rule over their own kingdom and have endless spirit children with their multiple goddess wives and live happily ever after.

They insist on calling their religion “Christian” because they believe in their version of Jesus Christ. Their “Trinity” is three separate gods – Heavenly Father (who has a father and grandfather, and great grandfather, ad infinitum); Jesus, brother of Satan and spirit-child of Heavenly Father, born on earth of the union of Heavenly Father and earthly Mary; and the Holy Spirit – but all spirit is matter, so their “Holy Spirit” is not what Christians understand.

References: Doctrine & Covenants; Gospel Principles, published by the LDS Church; The Teachings of Joseph Smith, Inside Mormonism by Isaiah Bennett

Jim Dandy

Edit to ask the Q – isn’t the birth of Jesus the result of an incestous relationship with Heavenly Father and his spirit-child daughter Mary?:whacky:
 
Yes, I was a convert to Mormonism at age 21. Served a mission to Taiwan, married in the temple, served many callings including Gospel Essentials teacher, Gospel Doctrines teacher, EQ president and 2nd Counselor in a bishopric.

Left the cult after learning the facts about LDS origins, history and doctrines.
Pretty close to me. I joined the church at age 21 (1994), served a mission to California. Married in the temple. Mostly served in the EQ, 1st Counselor and President.

Im currently “stuck” in the church due to my wife and child.
 
The Mormon “Heavenly Father” is an ‘exalted’ man of flesh and bones. All Mormon males can achieve the same status if they practice the Mormon religion and tithe faithfully. They may become gods and rule over their own kingdom and have endless spirit children with their multiple goddess wives and live happily ever after.

They insist on calling their religion “Christian” because they believe in their version of Jesus Christ. Their “Trinity” is three separate gods – Heavenly Father (who has a father and grandfather, and great grandfather, ad infinitum); Jesus, brother of Satan and spirit-child of Heavenly Father, born on earth of the union of Heavenly Father and earthly Mary; and the Holy Spirit – but all spirit is matter, so their “Holy Spirit” is not what Christians understand.

References: Doctrine & Covenants; Gospel Principles, published by the LDS Church; The Teachings of Joseph Smith, Inside Mormonism by Isaiah Bennett

Jim Dandy

Edit to ask the Q – isn’t the birth of Jesus the result of an incestous relationship with Heavenly Father and his spirit-child daughter Mary?:whacky:
Yea good point so the question to the LDS is “is there incest in heaven” and is there polygamy in heaven?

And where does this doctrine stem from other than Joseph Smith because it sure isn’t as far as i can tell Jewish or Christian.
 
Yea good point so the question to the LDS is “is there incest in heaven” and is there polygamy in heaven?

And where does this doctrine stem from other than Joseph Smith because it sure isn’t as far as i can tell Jewish or Christian.
All these doctrines and practices came directly from between Joseph’s legs.
 
Can you knowledgeable folks recommend some reliable internet sites that list core LDS doctrines?
 
Pretty close to me. I joined the church at age 21 (1994), served a mission to California. Married in the temple. Mostly served in the EQ, 1st Counselor and President.

Im currently “stuck” in the church due to my wife and child.
Stuck? Why are you “stuck”?
 
Can you knowledgeable folks recommend some reliable internet sites that list core LDS doctrines?
Their posts show that they aren’t “knowledgeable” in terms of knowing LDS doctrines, but they are “knowledgeable” in appearing so. To each their own.

One could find lds.org and read the Gospel Principles manual (available online) by linking from the link to “manuals”.

As far as Heavenly Father having a Father, then if so that relationship was prior to this universe being organized (a term used in some science is “multiverses” describing more than one universe in existence), and this universe is the only universe we need concern ourselves about, and worshiping Him and His Only Begotten Son, of whom the Holy Ghost bears witness, is the true worship to which humankind would do well to devote themselves.

Catholicism seems to have been unable to break away from allowing that those Jews who rejected Jesus did so because they believed in “One God” (not in the same way as Catholics) and those Jews did not believe that Jesus could possibly be Him, nor of course that He was the Great I Am, the God of Israel, nor that He was the one and only Savior, nor that He is the very Christ, the Anointed One prophesied by Isaiah.

So the path for the disbelief in a true Only Begotten Son was pointed out, direction-wise, by the Jews who were rejecting Him in His very presence.
 
Their posts show that they aren’t “knowledgeable” in terms of knowing LDS doctrines, but they are “knowledgeable” in appearing so. To each their own.
I didn’t see any mistakes in what they posted. Well, I think God having sex with Mary has been officially disavowed these days, but still a teaching. Most Mormons I’ve talked to say they don’t have a problem with the idea of it, just it’s not officially taught.
One could find lds.org and read the Gospel Principles manual (available online) by linking from the link to “manuals”.
As far as Heavenly Father having a Father, then if so that relationship was prior to this universe being organized (a term used in some science is “multiverses” describing more than one universe in existence), and this universe is the only universe we need concern ourselves about, and worshiping Him and His Only Begotten Son, of whom the Holy Ghost bears witness, is the true worship to which humankind would do well to devote themselves.
It’s still a belief in multiple gods, and a belief that humans will ultimately become equal to God by becoming gods themselves.
Catholicism seems to have been unable to break away from allowing that those Jews who rejected Jesus did so because they believed in “One God” (not in the same way as Catholics) and those Jews did not believe that Jesus could possibly be Him, nor of course that He was the Great I Am, the God of Israel, nor that He was the one and only Savior, nor that He is the very Christ, the Anointed One prophesied by Isaiah.
So the path for the disbelief in a true Only Begotten Son was pointed out, direction-wise, by the Jews who were rejecting Him in His very presence.
I didn’t follow that.
 
I didn’t see any mistakes in what they posted. Well, I think God having sex with Mary has been officially disavowed these days, but still a teaching. Most Mormons I’ve talked to say they don’t have a problem with the idea of it, just it’s not officially taught.
Freddo,

No, that isn’t a teaching, and never was, and doesn’t need to be “disavowed” because it was never a teaching. Just because you have “talked to” a few people, does not make itself into a survey with any credibility as a survey.
It’s still a belief in multiple gods, and a belief that humans will ultimately become equal to God by becoming gods themselves.
Jesus taught very plainly a belief in more than one God, and was killed for that by being horribly crucified.

He also taught that those whom He came to save could become perfect and could inherit a kingdom and could enter into the joy of their Lord. That did not mean “equal to”, nor has The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints taught “equal to”, ever. But it does mean “have the kind of joy They have”.

To have the kind of joy They have would be to have the kind of love They have because that is the source of joy. That kind of love is empowering because it is both Christ-centered and other-centered in every way, seeking to lift and build and enjoy the growth of others because of loving them, with no sense of decreasing their free will choice.
I didn’t follow that.
That’s fine. Some will, some won’t.
A wish of peace to all readers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top