T
ThurifAcolyte
Guest
Feel free to start a new thread to discuss this if you desire. We of course do not believe that the Trinity doctrine did not exist until the Ecumenical Council of Nicaea.(i) Of course, until the First Council of Nicaea, which was not until 325 A.D., the doctrine of the Trinity (same in substance) did not exist. So, were all of the “Christians” before 325 A.D. not really Christian because they never even heard of the Trinity? I know that someone will post that the First Council of Nicaea simply “recognized” what had “always” been the “truth”. However, my question is whether “Christians” who had never even heard of, much less believed in, the Trinity for more than three centuries were not really Christians.
Again, feel free to start a new thread to discuss these claims. Why do Councils have to have prophets? Was there prophecy happening in Acts 15? Again, we do not put our faith in the Nicene Creed. The Nicene Creed is a definition of our faith. We believe that the Trinity is Biblical (and taught and believed in by Christians prior to the Council of Nicaea), as you believe your belief is Biblical.(ii) Joseph recorded (if you want to say “fabricated”, because you believe Joseph was a fraud, go right ahead), that the Lord told him that, as to all of the Churches of his day, “all their creeds were an abomination in his sight.” Why was that? There were no prophets, and no revelations, at Nicaea or any of the other many early church councils, and the recorders of those councils never claimed that there were. The doctrine of the Trinity was established (I will not say “fabricated”) based upon argument, majority vote and, crucially, pressure from the Roman emperor to dispose of a politically dangerous controversy (the Arians versus the Alexandrians), which the emperor believed trivially abstract, in order to increase the stability of the Roman Empire. As Mormons say, those who subscribe to the Nicene Creed put their faith in the words of men rather than the Word of God. Wikipedia has a fairly good article about the First Council of Nicaea. For a really rigorous scholarly, but readable, account of how Nicaea and the other early church councils really worked (including politics, self-interest, violence, etc.) read Yale Professor Ramsay MacMullen’s book “Voting About God: In the Early Church Councils” (Yale U. Press. 2006).