Once people in the US and Europe realize that media entertainment is the modus operandi that has weakened people into an addiction for the shallow amusements of love-less lust and drugs that don’t last, people will start to crave the depth of True Love and peace once again, and open their eyes once again. Unfortunatley, some people will need to hit rock bottom first in order to see it.
Well, you could shout it at Jefferson’s grave, but I don’t think he’ll hear you.
Actually, I do not watch TV at all… !
You are so very right! We have absolutely no “scientific evidence” that God does not exist. We have absolutely no “scientific evidence” that the Loch Ness monster does not exist. We have absolutely no “scientific evidence” that Russell’s teapot does not exist. None at all! Amazing… so from that it surely follows (by your “reasoning”) that we should believe the existence of all these beings… surely you believe in all of them, since you have no “scientific ecidence” of the nonexistence of these “beings”. Or maybe… just maybe you do not believe in their existence???
Whenever I hear vile ravings like this, I realize exactly what Dawkins is fighting against.Humanity evolved from anarchy to Catholicism. We were doing just fine until TV was invented and the profiteers realized they could profit from our deconstruction back into weaklings who lust for basic instinctual pleasure via all the sex-for-sport, drugs, etc. We have given in to basic instincts for so long that we are too spoiled and comfortable to want to give it up. The Regressives (progressives) actually have the nerve to call this progress, when it is a regression into childish simpletonism. Either, they have been inbred for so long that they refuse to see it, or they believe that a Reduced people who are addicted to childish pleasure are easier to control. We have gone from fortitude and resourcefulness to an addiction for entertainment and brain pleasurism. It the exact OPPOSITE of progress, but they conveniently own the microphones, so they can LABEL their propaganda whatever they want to the masses and many people will fall for the CON. Many people will still believe them thanks to heaping the “you’re open-minded if you agree with us” propaganda.
Catholicism already has the Social Contract between man and woman, the Rules for Living. No need to become devolved, deconstructed, or tempted away from them. We need to be MORE like them. If media entertainment is the obstacle, then…
Hitler was a Roman Catholic, as was HIlter’s Pope. The current pope was a member of the Hitler youth.
Right, So when you mock US for having no proof to justify beliefs, you call it logic. When I mock you for having no proof to justify your beliefs, that’s somehow perfectly reasonable. :nope:
Well, you obviously have no clue.
Yes, obviously.
Hi Pot. Kettle here. When intolerant people tell me I have no right to deviate from what they, in their infinite wisdom, consider the only proper way to live, you’re damn right I treat it with zero tolerance.
Not really. They would send in hostile witnesses to proclaim your guilt, even without a shred of proof. We are not the miscreants Hollywood likes to portray Christians as. They are. (At least one of them is.)
Yes, plenty… For example, I know this little chestnut, you blithering ignoramous:
Only one?
Once a person is baptised a Catholic he is a Catholic. Hitler was not a practicing Catholic; nor one in good standing; but he was a Catholic. The Catholic Church count’s Judas among the disciples; and it counts all the lost sheep as members of the Church. Even excommunication does not remove a person from the Church. (and as far as I know; he was not excommunicated).
You cannot remove someone from the Catholic Church. Baptism, like Ordination - leaves an indellible mark upon the Character of man. Excommunication does not remove them from the Church.
Then why do they do it?
So TV is the root of all evil? That’s a new one. Do you advocate a governmental ban?
Excommunication is recognised in an individual (most of the time it is automatic) to encourage that individual to repent; and to encourage people not to follow that person in their crimes.
