Is Shaking hands a "No No"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter water
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I smile and say “peace be with you” to the people around me, but I try to keep my hands full at that point of the Mass (not hard to do with 4 kids) to avoid handshaking. It’s not about me, it’s about those poor people around me who would be receiving baby drool and illnesses that one or another of my children always seem to have or are incubating. I do smile very big so nobody gets the wrong idea (hopefully), and I am as friendly as I can be considering how shy I am.
I think the idea is not about a physical hand shaking. A smile, a nod could be the same way of saying “peace be with you”. In some other country, their custom is nodding their heads.
 
The sign of peace was a more ancient part of the Mass that over time had become restricted to the clergy. With the reforms of Paul VI it was restored. Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but I think many Eastern liturgies have the people exchange the kiss of peace.
 
This famous interaction between St. Monica and St. Ambrose lays down the traditional norm for how we should behave in a church with different (lawful) customs than we may be used to:

"When Monica moved from North Africa to Milan, she found religious practices new to her and also that some of her former customs, such as a Saturday fast, were not common there. She asked St. Ambrose which customs she should follow. His classic reply was: “When I am here, I do not fast on Saturday, but I fast when I am in Rome; do the same and always follow the custom and discipline of the Church as it is observed in the particular locality in which you find yourself.”
americancatholic.org/Features/SaintOfDay/default.asp?id=1120
 
Our Holy Father, Benedict XVI, briefly addressed the ‘sign of peace’ in his Apostolic Exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis. After writing about the great value of this sign and stressing the need for it he goes on to mention that it is also sometimes exaggerated . He ends by saying, “It should be kept in mind that nothing is lost when the sign of peace is marked by a sobriety which preserves the proper spirit of the celebration, as, for example, when it is restricted to one’s immediate neighbors.”

Peace!
 
Thanks for posting that Thursday. I am glad to see it is okay ,but
I did notice that it says" offer the sign of peace only to those who are nearest and in a sober manner". Well, people in our church reach all over, and there is hugging and kissing family, so it gets to be quite cozy.🤷 I guess this is something that has gotten out of hand maybe.

Blessings
That’s exactly it. In some parishes, the priest leaves the sanctuary and shakes the hands of people in the front pews and then up the aisles. In those parishes, I’ve seen a festive attitude exhibited at the sign of peace. This is not what the Rubrics call for - the priest is not supposed to leave the sanctuary and the rest of us are to offer the sign “in a sober manner,” as you mentioned.
 
Medically speaking, shaking of hands is not sanitary especially if you don’t know the person you are shaking hands with, so I think bowing to each other will do or socialize after the Mass.
Liturgically speaking, it is a new thing invented after the reformation of the Catholic Liturgy; I think it is better if we follow the original rubrics because in a Novus Ordo Missae as I observed many people were either going around and talking or socializing that results into a social club gathering.

Pax
Laudater Jesus Christus
Instaurare omnia in Christo
 
Medically speaking, shaking of hands is not sanitary especially if you don’t know the person you are shaking hands with, so I think bowing to each other will do or socialize after the Mass.
Liturgically speaking, it is a new thing invented after the reformation of the Catholic Liturgy; I think it is better if we follow the original rubrics because in a Novus Ordo Missae as I observed many people were either going around and talking or socializing that results into a social club gathering.

Pax
Laudater Jesus Christus
Instaurare omnia in Christo
You may bow if you wish. I believe many shake hands because that is part of the common culture. I’m sure a kiss of peace is much more common in Europe and the Middle East. I’d be willing to bet more East Asians bow to each other.
I hope it does stay, though there is one change I would like to make. In some of the Eastern Rites that have a kiss of Peace, it is exchanged among any priests present first, then from priest to deacon, then deacon to subdeacon, then the faithful are asked to exchange the sign of peace. I think this fits much better into the the Mass than what we have now.

Yours in Christ,
Thursday

P.S.
Forgot to add this: It wasn’t invented after the reformation, it has always been part of Catholic worship. It fell out of use in the Latin Rite (except at a High Mass, among the Clergy), but it was continued in the East.
 
Sometimes people overdo it. You don’t have to join in: just nod and say something like “The peace of Christ to you”. Physical contact is in no way required by the rubrics.
This last point is true!

Where I was able to attend Mass today it was easy enough and understood that nodding to the person the next pew over in a simple prayerful gesture of peace upon their soul and yours in kind sufficed.

You do not have to move all around and shake hands like a meet & greet.
 
You may bow if you wish. I believe many shake hands because that is part of the common culture. I’m sure a kiss of peace is much more common in Europe and the Middle East. I’d be willing to bet more East Asians bow to each other.
I hope it does stay, though there is one change I would like to make. In some of the Eastern Rites that have a kiss of Peace, it is exchanged among any priests present first, then from priest to deacon, then deacon to subdeacon, then the faithful are asked to exchange the sign of peace.
Which eastern church have you seen this in?
 
I’ve read these posts looking for what many people do in my parish but have yet to come across one…Somebody please tell me that my parish is not the only that offers the sign of peace to someone a distance away…with the forefinger and middle finger. (Like it was done in the 70’s.) 😊
 
We occasionally have someone give the “Peace sign” to another maybe a couple of rows away. We’ll do it within the choir when we physically can’t reach the other person, and are usually very discreet with the sign.

Maybe it’s me or my parish, but I don’t see a problem with our priest coming down and offering a handshake or hug or other sign of peace to those in the first or second row, as long as it doesn’t impose on the flow of the mass.

He’s part of our parish community too…why shouldn’t he share in our mutual exchange of peace with a physical handshake or hug?

I don’t want to imply that the rubrics should be ignored, but our priest does this all the time, the bishops know it and apparently don’t have a problem with it.

It’s right for our parish, and I’m sure many others, while other parishes it wouldn’t work. I admit that I sort of bristle at the suggestion that we should all do **everything ** exactly the same way in every parish, in some sort of lockstep.

Yes, of course, rubrics/standards have to be followed, but there has to be room for local expression in our celebration of the mass. If mass gets too “stodgy”…well, that’s another issue…I won’t go there. It’s just nice to see some little variations from parish to parish, provided there are no abuses, of course.

-N2
 
We occasionally have someone give the “Peace sign” to another maybe a couple of rows away. We’ll do it within the choir when we physically can’t reach the other person, and are usually very discreet with the sign.

Maybe it’s me or my parish, but I don’t see a problem with our priest coming down and offering a handshake or hug or other sign of peace to those in the first or second row, as long as it doesn’t impose on the flow of the mass.

He’s part of our parish community too…why shouldn’t he share in our mutual exchange of peace with a physical handshake or hug?

I don’t want to imply that the rubrics should be ignored, but our priest does this all the time, the bishops know it and apparently don’t have a problem with it.

It’s right for our parish, and I’m sure many others, while other parishes it wouldn’t work. I admit that I sort of bristle at the suggestion that we should all do **everything **exactly the same way in every parish, in some sort of lockstep.

Yes, of course, rubrics/standards have to be followed, but there has to be room for local expression in our celebration of the mass. If mass gets too “stodgy”…well, that’s another issue…I won’t go there. It’s just nice to see some little variations from parish to parish, provided there are no abuses, of course.

-N2
You are contradicting yourself. You think your priest should follow the rubrics, but you don’t think he should have to follow the rubrics that say he should not leave the sanctuary. 🤷
dioceseofgallup.org/bishop/liturgy/GIRM/liturgydirectives.htm
  1. ***The priest should not leave the sanctuary at the sign of peace. ***But for a good reason, on special occasions, the priest may offer the sign of peace to others. These are to be understood as expressions of hospitality, respect for cultural diversity, and responses to unique pastoral need (2002 GIRM 154).
***The priest has already extended a greeting of peace to he whole assembly when he says, “The Peace of the Lord be with you.” ***
 
Don’t forget, that at this part of the Mass, the Victim is on the Altar, offering Himself to the Father for the sins of the world, no less than He did on Calvary 2000 years ago.

Would it be appropriate to go around giving peace signs and hugs, handshakes and waves if you were there?

Well, we *are *there, at the foot of the cross, every time we go to Mass. Shake hands before Mass, or afterward. Wouldn’t a simple bow to the person either side of you be sufficient for a sign of peace?

Once we get the external expressions of the Faith back on track, the interior ones will surely follow. We are made of body and soul, and we use both to worship God. It is the teaching of the Church that the external signs are necessary to cultivate a deeper interior devotion.

2 cents in the money box…
 
Don’t forget, that at this part of the Mass, the Victim is on the Altar, offering Himself to the Father for the sins of the world, no less than He did on Calvary 2000 years ago.

Would it be appropriate to go around giving peace signs and hugs, handshakes and waves if you were there?

Well, we *are *there, at the foot of the cross, every time we go to Mass. Shake hands before Mass, or afterward. Wouldn’t a simple bow to the person either side of you be sufficient for a sign of peace?

Once we get the external expressions of the Faith back on track, the interior ones will surely follow. We are made of body and soul, and we use both to worship God. It is the teaching of the Church that the external signs are necessary to cultivate a deeper interior devotion.

2 cents in the money box…
Sincere offer for another of your $.02 🙂 perhaps we can set up a payment plan? 😛

so then I should stop giving the 70’s peace sign? :o We have one priest of 3 that does this…he holds up both palms and then makes this peace sign to everyone.
 
Sincere offer for another of your $.02 🙂 perhaps we can set up a payment plan? 😛

so then I should stop giving the 70’s peace sign? :o We have one priest of 3 that does this…he holds up both palms and then makes this peace sign to everyone.
Thanks, that gave me a chuckle!

I guess it all comes form having a deeper understanding of what Holy Mass is about, rather than me or anyone else saying we should or should not do this or that.

Once I began to understand that the Mass was one and the same sacrifice as Calvary, on the first Good Friday 2000 years ago, I was dumbfounded. I was not taught that in Catholic School in the 70’s and 80’s. I now go to Mass with far more fear and trembling than I did before having a fuller understanding thanks be to God. I absolutely love and adore the Mass.

When I see a particular Altar server in my parish giving the peace sign from the sanctuary to the whole congregation with a huge beaming smile, I cringe and get quite cross. My good wife has to remind me that the altar server probably doesn’t know what the Mass really is. If they did, they would probably not do something like that, I hope.

Mass is serious and solemn. After Mass, Catholics are as good or better at socialising than anyone else, and I think this would be the appropriate place for joviality, having just made our peace with God through the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

There’s 2 more cents…
 
The sign of peace is in the rubrics, but the holding the hands during the Pater Noster is not, and really came from the Charismatic Catholics.
Weird, holding hands during the Our Father is frowned upon in the Catholic charismatic community, at least in the charismatic communities I’ve seen in the Detroit area, and Steubenville.

I always thought it just came from Protestants and AA.
 
Don’t forget, that at this part of the Mass, the Victim is on the Altar, offering Himself to the Father for the sins of the world, no less than He did on Calvary 2000 years ago.

Would it be appropriate to go around giving peace signs and hugs, handshakes and waves if you were there?

Well, we *are *there, at the foot of the cross, every time we go to Mass. Shake hands before Mass, or afterward. Wouldn’t a simple bow to the person either side of you be sufficient for a sign of peace?

Once we get the external expressions of the Faith back on track, the interior ones will surely follow. We are made of body and soul, and we use both to worship God. It is the teaching of the Church that the external signs are necessary to cultivate a deeper interior devotion.

2 cents in the money box…
We’re at the Resurrection at the Mass as well…
 
Our Holy Father, Benedict XVI, briefly addressed the ‘sign of peace’ in his Apostolic Exhortation Sacramentum Caritatis. After writing about the great value of this sign and stressing the need for it he goes on to mention that it is also sometimes exaggerated . He ends by saying, “It should be kept in mind that nothing is lost when the sign of peace is marked by a sobriety which preserves the proper spirit of the celebration, as, for example, when it is restricted to one’s immediate neighbors.”

Peace!
I believe it was in this same document that the Pope recommended that the timing of the sign of peace be re-evaluated. He suggested that it may be more appropriate for it to occur before the eucharistic prayers.
 
He certainly mentions it in his book, " The Spirit of the Liturgy". In reference to the missal used in Zaire (the Congo), which is the
Roman rite with the addition of certain elements of the Christian East. The then Cardinal Ratzinger said," In line with what is said in Matthew 5:23-25, the sign of peace is exchanged, not before Communion, but before the Presentation of the Gifts, which would be desirable for the whole of the Roman rite, insofar as the sign of peace is something we want to retain.

Peace!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top