Is sterilization ok if a future pregnancy could end up with the death of a mother?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cheerfulcherub
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Some of the health consequences, such as increased risk of prostate cancer following vasectomies, or increased need for hysterectomy following tubal ligation, may be part of the heavier cross some build for themselves and their families. If the moral teachings of the Church don’t convince some of you, perhaps you should look at the simple health consequences of sterilization, especially when the sterilization is prompted by concern for health.
Exactly. Even if some believe that these surgeries are not morally wrong, there are so many health consequences that really need to be thought out. I forgot something in a previous post–having your tubes tied is also linked to premature ovarian failure, which throws a woman into menopause much earlier than she otherwise would.
 
Save your life by removing a cancerous uterus, kill yourself by having a baby your body can’t handle. This I don’t understand. Something tells me that if men had to risk their lives in childbirth, the Church would change Her mind really fast.

Kim
 
Save your life by removing a cancerous uterus, kill yourself by having a baby your body can’t handle. This I don’t understand. Something tells me that if men had to risk their lives in childbirth, the Church would change Her mind really fast.

Kim
You are very wrong. The Church’s teaching has nothing to do with who gets to experience suffering. The Church’s teaching has to do with right and wrong. Cancer is a medical condition that can be treated in various ways–meds, removal of disease, etc. Dangerous pregnancies can be avoided either by using total abstinence or periodic abstinence. What’s the problem? The Church doesn’t say “keep having children, even if it will kill you”. There are valid, licit options. I would hope that a Catholic husband whose wife is in this situation would have compassion and be adult enough to handle either type of abstinence.

Jennifer
 
You are very wrong. The Church’s teaching has nothing to do with who gets to experience suffering. The Church’s teaching has to do with right and wrong. Cancer is a medical condition that can be treated in various ways–meds, removal of disease, etc. Dangerous pregnancies can be avoided either by using total abstinence or periodic abstinence. What’s the problem? The Church doesn’t say “keep having children, even if it will kill you”. There are valid, licit options. I would hope that a Catholic husband whose wife is in this situation would have compassion and be adult enough to handle either type of abstinence.

Jennifer
The reality of life is that not everyone is able to handle abstinence. Remember that sex is not just for procreation. Living out abstinence as a single person or as a religious is one thing. Remaining faithful and abstinent when your spouse is bedridden or otherwise incapacitated is another. But two young married people with normal sex drives, having no debilitating health conditions, living under the same roof and possibly even having to share the same bed - remaining abstinent indefinitely? This I have to see…

I’m not saying the teachings of the Church are wrong, just that it’s a complicated, difficult matter to have to deal with and when people make it sound so simple, it doesn’t really seem to help those facing the situation.

The more I think of this the more complicated it seems to get. What if such a person got pregnant and did develop life-threatening conditions that necessitated delivery too early for the baby to have a chance? I know life-saving treatment or early delivery in such circumstance would be allowed but personally I would have a much, much harder time (as a parent) dealing with that than with sterilization.

Again, my thoughts here are just about how hard these issues are practically, not whether sterilization is right or wrong.
 
The reality of life is that not everyone is able to handle abstinence. Remember that sex is not just for procreation. Living out abstinence as a single person or as a religious is one thing. Remaining faithful and abstinent when your spouse is bedridden or otherwise incapacitated is another. But two young married people with normal sex drives, having no debilitating health conditions, living under the same roof and possibly even having to share the same bed - remaining abstinent indefinitely? This I have to see…

I’m not saying the teachings of the Church are wrong, just that it’s a complicated, difficult matter to have to deal with and when people make it sound so simple, it doesn’t really seem to help those facing the situation.

The more I think of this the more complicated it seems to get. What if such a person got pregnant and did develop life-threatening conditions that necessitated delivery too early for the baby to have a chance? I know life-saving treatment or early delivery in such circumstance would be allowed but personally I would have a much, much harder time (as a parent) dealing with that than with sterilization.

Again, my thoughts here are just about how hard these issues are practically, not whether sterilization is right or wrong.
Jesus promises us many things and having an easy life is NOT one of them. We all have struggles and difficulities and Jesus calls us to “take up your cross and follow me”. Take a look at the lives of saints–not a lot of easy lives there. I seem to remember Jesus saying “With God, all things are possible” (Matthew 19:26). While he was specifically taking about salvation, I think abstinence would fall under this…

I think keeping sex in perspective is the key. No one will die without sex. There are other ways to be close and show love, esp in dire situations. We, in our current culture, get so hung up about how “important” sex is. We need to rely on God more. Would this be easy, no. No one ever said it would be, but living a moral life will be worth it in the end…

Jennifer
 
. I forgot something in a previous post–having your tubes tied is also linked to premature ovarian failure, which throws a woman into menopause much earlier than she otherwise would.
That’s actually not true and medically impossible to cause ovarian failure.
 
I think Seekerz has a good point. St. Paul pointed out that if for some reason a husband and wife are apart or have to abstain, to return to each other so they do not fall into sin. It is difficult for men and women alike to abstain, especially when they get to see their spouse naked and they sleep together. To demonstrate how difficult it is look at the hundreds of posts on married men struggling with masturbation.

Truely abstinance may be morally acceptable, St. Paul warns us that the temptations will increase and may be overwhelming. I think that if a man had to sleep next to his wife and watch her get dressed and sleep next to her and was never allowed to touch her sexually at all, he may definitely start masturbating or God forbid have affairs.

Generally speaking, married couples are not called to completely abstain.
 
I don’t think it has been emphasized enough that even a vasectomy does not provide 100% conception prevention. You will ALWAYS hear stories of how some people got pregnant using NFP – just as you will ALWAYS year stories of how some people got pregnant using the Pill, or after they had a hysterecotomy…or after their DH got a vas. To the OP – none of these stories should have any bearing on what you do, since statistically speaking, using conservative NFP is extrememly effective. Instead of worrying about other people’s birth control failures, you should take a class to learn sympto-thermal NFP with a very well-trained teacher. Practice it with the most conservative rules possible. Do this whether or not your DH ever gets a vas.

Then, if by some miracle you do get pregnant again, seek out a midwife who will help you have a natural, vaginal delivery so you do not have to go through a drug-ridden, medically dangerous birth ever again. Believe it or not, there are people who have safely delivered vaginally, even after three c/sections – although in my opinion the only way to acheive that would be to see a midwife - not in a hospital.

My prayers are with you!
 
I think Seekerz has a good point. St. Paul pointed out that if for some reason a husband and wife are apart or have to abstain, to return to each other so they do not fall into sin. It is difficult for men and women alike to abstain, especially when they get to see their spouse naked and they sleep together. To demonstrate how difficult it is look at the hundreds of posts on married men struggling with masturbation.

Truely abstinance may be morally acceptable, St. Paul warns us that the temptations will increase and may be overwhelming. I think that if a man had to sleep next to his wife and watch her get dressed and sleep next to her and was never allowed to touch her sexually at all, he may definitely start masturbating or God forbid have affairs.

Generally speaking, married couples are not called to completely abstain.
This is true.

The church has also given us the tools (NFP) that with good cause you can still have relations and avoid preganancy.
 
That’s actually not true and medically impossible to cause ovarian failure.
Can you cite a source for that? I’m in surgical meno and have been doing a lot of reading. According to The Premature Menopause Book, it is a risk factor for POF.
 
Can you cite a source for that? I’m in surgical meno and have been doing a lot of reading. According to The Premature Menopause Book, it is a risk factor for POF.
I can answer! I wouldn’t go by the Premature Meno book. You need a true medical book, but I had the privilege to speaking to this man along another medical professionals. (yes, I had to had more than one person give me the same answer. )

drdonnica.com/guests/00006208.htm

I brought up that concern with many others. I heard it was true, it was false…

He as well said that is a false myth and gave reasons of why it’s not possible.

I have read mis-information in books before regarding many topics.
 
Thanks! I’m glad that got cleared up; I didn’t realize that she was wrong. I’ll check out that website.
 
You will ALWAYS hear stories of how some people got pregnant using NFP – just as you will ALWAYS year stories of how some people got pregnant using the Pill, or after they had a hysterecotomy…or after their DH got a vas.
Hey, Lizzie, welcome to the forums! Just wanted to post a quick correction. I’m sure you meant “tubal ligation” instead of hysterectomy. 😃
 
That’s funny…when I proofread my post, all I noticed was that I had spelled it wrong, not that I had used the wrong word altogether. LOL. Yes, of course, I meant a tubal.
 
Save your life by removing a cancerous uterus, kill yourself by having a baby your body can’t handle. This I don’t understand. Something tells me that if men had to risk their lives in childbirth, the Church would change Her mind really fast.
This is the very reason my mother left the Church. She was an aid at our local hospital for many years. A woman in advanced pregnancy came in with complications. It turns out that the Docs flat out TOLD her after the last baby “The next pregnancy will KILL either you or the baby… you cannot handle another child.” Regardless of these warnings she wouldn’t even consider NFP - She died delivering, the baby lived. Leaving a man with 5 children under 12 with no mother. (What is better, birth control & a mother for children, or a widower and 5 motherless children?) The Priest of the parish praised her for her choice… and made her an example for others to follow! God will provide! (Easy for someone to say that doesn’t have to provide daily care for 5 children and maintain a job & household… when there was a alternative… and DON’T preach the “abstinence” thing here… married people have/need sex. We’re human first, Catholic 2nd.).
You are very wrong. The Church’s teaching has nothing to do with who gets to experience suffering. The Church’s teaching has to do with right and wrong. Cancer is a medical condition that can be treated in various ways–meds, removal of disease, etc.
Treated yes, Cured NO. Cancer does not go away… (yet).
The reality of life is that not everyone is able to handle abstinence. Remember that sex is not just for procreation. Living out abstinence as a single person or as a religious is one thing. Remaining faithful and abstinent when your spouse is bedridden or otherwise incapacitated is another. But two young married people with normal sex drives, having no debilitating health conditions, living under the same roof and possibly even having to share the same bed - remaining abstinent indefinitely? This I have to see…
Me too. A marriage will die from lack of physical intimacy
I don’t think it has been emphasized enough that even a vasectomy does not provide 100% conception prevention.
In my own experience… 4 Titanium clamps, 1/2" of plumbing removed, and 12 years is proof for me.
 
This is the very reason my mother left the Church. She was an aid at our local hospital for many years. A woman in advanced pregnancy came in with complications. It turns out that the Docs flat out TOLD her after the last baby “The next pregnancy will KILL either you or the baby… you cannot handle another child.” Regardless of these warnings she wouldn’t even consider NFP - She died delivering, the baby lived. Leaving a man with 5 children under 12 with no mother. (What is better, birth control & a mother for children, or a widower and 5 motherless children?) The Priest of the parish praised her for her choice… and made her an example for others to follow! God will provide! (Easy for someone to say that doesn’t have to provide daily care for 5 children and maintain a job & household… when there was a alternative… and DON’T preach the “abstinence” thing here… married people have/need sex. We’re human first, Catholic 2nd.).

Treated yes, Cured NO. Cancer does not go away… (yet).

Me too. A marriage will die from lack of physical intimacy

In my own experience… 4 Titanium clamps, 1/2" of plumbing removed, and 12 years is proof for me.
That couple made a choice. They chose to let go and let God. I only wish my parents had been that strong. My father had a vasctomy because my mother has a rare heart condition. They choose to listen to an idiot doctor who told them my mother would probably die around 60 (nevermind the fact they plan to operate sooner and then she’ll have a normal life span). And to our parish priest who was removed during the sex abuse scandel. I’m not saying anything bad about our former priest, I loved him, but the Church laws come first. I understood this even though i was only 11 at the time. We had a full fledge arugment over this when I found out my parents had broken the laws. We still aruge about it from time to time. My children come before my health. My soul comes before my life. For the body is only dust but the spirt is immortal. God’s plan may be different then what I would like but that doesn’t mean I should ignore it.

Bottom line, don’t do it. Pratice strict NFP, and pray, and if God sends you anoughter baby, then he will send you a way to have him/her safetly. Everything happens for a reason.
 
Me too. A marriage will die from lack of physical intimacy
A marriage may die from lack of physical intimacy, but it will not die from lack of sexual intimacy. Statements like this do not show us as very different from the animals. Humans have reason. Reason seems to be worth little in this type of assertion. I know too many people who are living chaste, celibate marriages to buy into this kind of thinking.
 
A marriage may die from lack of physical intimacy, but it will not die from lack of sexual intimacy.
Will you please define a single sexual act that is not physical?
Statements like this do not show us as very different from the animals.
We are animals… Watch the 6pm news!..

Frankly dogs are better than us. Humans are the only species that’ll destroy/deficate where they have to sleep.
 
Will you please define a single sexual act that is not physical?
There are acts of physical intimacy that are not sexual. That is my point. A couple can be physically intimate without being sexual. This idea that sexual intimacy is the be-all-end-all is disrespectful to people who are not sexually intimate. It implies that their intimacy is somehow not as good, just because it is not sexual.
We are animals… Watch the 6pm news!..
Frankly dogs are better than us. Humans are the only species that’ll destroy/deficate where they have to sleep.
Ok. There I might agree with you. But it could be by human instinct or poor training.
 
I would like others thoughts on this situation. If you read my other post on this thread you know that I am pregnant with my fifth child. Previous to this pregnancy my husband wanted a vasectomy and I refused. DH didnt’ take that too well and our family life was miserable becaue I would not sign the consent forms. Finally I broke down and signed the forms as the stress was too great. I would not take him to the appointments to have it done as I felt I would be an accomplice to something I did not beleive in. He had a freind take him to the appointments but because of medical issued on my husbands part the two doctors he went to at two differnt facilities did not do the procedure. The first doc because he could not do it because of the possible complications and it would have to be done in the hospital. The second doc laid out the risks to my husband in his situation and my husband decided not to do it. Now my husband visted yet another doc who is willing to do a vasectomy. It is scheduled for mid June. Now my delimma is do I go through the turmoil again and refuse to sign the consent or sign my consent under duress. Also this time my husband is insisting on me going because of the risks. I asked him are you sure you want to take all these risks for your health/life and go through with a vasectomy. And he said yes he is absolutely sure and that I should take him there and be there for him since he tried my way using NFP and now we’re pregnant again. I don’t want my husband to have the vas but I feel conflicted. I feel as if I should take him to the procecdure and be with him in case somethign horrible happens to him. I just don’t know. I’ve been trying to pray about this but I just feel it is wrong to take him as that would be supporting him in this which I do not. I would like to leave future children/no children up to God. I am willing to take a medical risk to have another child and my husband is willing to take a medical risk to not have any more children. It just does not make sense. Sorry for my rambling a lot is goign through my mind. I hope someone can shed some light on this issue or maybe a Priest on this forum has been asked similar question in the past. I would like honest church teaching on this please.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top