E
Edmundus1581
Guest
Clearly not, as when the Anglican communion was debating women’s ordination, Rome did object, and sent a warning that this move would endanger ecumenical efforts. As I recall, Rome only mentioned the ecumenical implications, rather than the issue itself. If so, I am sure that this restraint was due to diplomacy only.So then there would be no objection from the Roman Catholic Church if another Church (or ecclesial community) were to attempt to ordain women, such as the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Old Catholic Church, or the Anglican Church?
AFAIK, the issue has not come up with the Eastern Orthodox, or Old Catholic Church. I cannot speculate on what Rome would do if it were to come up.
I may be reading too much into this, but the document, in English translation, refers to “delicts” against the sacraments, so it is restricting its judgement only to those crimes for which it, Rome, is the juridicial authority. In my reading, Rome is only exercising jurisdiction on its own subjects.
This is all assuming the premise of John Paul II’s binding Apostolic Letter that the Church only has authority to ordain women. The only dispute is about whether the attempt to ordain women by other communities is some sort of crime. In my reading, the church has been deliberately silent on this.
If the church has been silent, as I believe it has, then it is probably best for us to follow its lead. But you do know wrong in asking.