The data you have yet to post? You’re the one claiming it’s statistical, you’re the one making claims, you dig up the data and present it.I would just implore you all to look a the the data
Isn’t it funny what people can get away with when they speak “in general” or “statistically”?I guess we will have to agree to disagree.
No, we don’t. Your position, as you expressed it, is simply wrongI guess we will have to agree to disagree.
You are simply using data that may or may not even be accurate to support long debunked assumptions and attitudes. Stop doing that and educate yourself on the actual realities of real humans, both as groups and individuals.I would just implore you all to look a the the data in the aggregate and that over large populations what seems like disparities or inequalities
You did no such thing. You’ve instead angered the women of this forum by belittling them, all while hiding behind “statistics”, and posted non sequiturs such as higher intelligence resulting in higher pay.I don’t have the want to dig it up. I just wanted to destroy @Freddy notions that women don’t have equal opportunity or wages or are not hired.
I don’t respond to such broad over generalizations. I would have to be speaking to someone I knew was actually open to listening, and then discuss specific things in the Bible, and go from there. It also would depend on how knowledgeable the person actually is about the Bible.How do we respond to claims that the Bible is misogynistic?
You are wrong. I have seen the real data. Show us the data you are using or stop claiming it supports your wrong position. You claimed, it is up to you to support it. Or stop repeating the claim.I am right. Look up the data yourself
Not according the this…Most likely the person with the highest IQ would be a man,
It is when you’re making a claim.It is not my job to do research for you.
Ah, yes. And now you’re claiming they’ve been known for years.Claims that have been known for years? No.
It is your job and your responsibility to support your gratuitous assertions when challenged. Otherwise you are just trolling. I have done my own research, but you have clearly not done any actual research, misinterpreted the research you did do, or are using bad sources. I am done. You are clearly not willing to engage within established norms, so welcome to the Ignore bucket. Since you seem to be new based on your profile I will explain that this means I will not see anything you post from this point forward, and even the posts you have made before become hidden to me. You are now an unperson in my personal view.It is not my job to do research for you.
What line of work are you in?I am saying that the most intelligent people are men. Therefore they will be getting the higher paying jobs.
I did. And you are still wrong.am right. Look up the data yourself an you will see. That’s why I say I implore you all to look.
Your refusal that the burden is on you is fallacious. And since you haven’t read the link (but somehow you expect me to look up evidence that supports your claim), I’ll post what it says.But I never said the burden of proof was yours either. Thus I am not in violation of a fallacy.
“The burden of proof lies with someone who is making a claim, and is not upon anyone else to disprove. The inability, or disinclination, to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever. However it is important to note that we can never be certain of anything, and so we must assign value to any claim based on the available evidence, and to dismiss something on the basis that it hasn’t been proven beyond all doubt is also fallacious reasoning.”