H
hawk
Guest
It is wrong, because in the haste to build bridges, the Church, has allowed a most destructive teaching to be propogated, that Christ did not die.
What do you think?
What do you think?
What are you talking about? Jesus Christ certainly DID die and certainly DID arise from the DEAD which is why there is the Roman Catholic Church etc. etc. why would there be a religion otherwise.It is wrong, because in the haste to build bridges, the Church, has allowed a most destructive teaching to be propogated, that Christ did not die.
What do you think?
Specifically, the Catechism says they profess to hold the faith of Abraham… not that they actually do. I don’t understand why so many have been mislead by this.Probably Hawk is referring to the CHurch akcnowledgment that muslims hold the faith of Abraham.
The church never explicitly say that all the words contained in the Quran is true–some of them are though-- like the existence of the One God. The church cannot say this is not true because indeed this is true. It’s the same as in other non-Christian religions who hold some truth in their beliefs and the church has to regard it with respect. It’s wonderful that the Church dialogues with them, just as Christ while on earth talked to non-Jews as well. The attitude of the Church is always that of his Master.Hawk is referring to the Muslim teaching that Jesus did not die. He thinks that the Church’s ‘acceptance’ of Muslims as holding the faith of Abraham, tends to help give credence to this false teaching. And that surely cannot be the intent of the Catechism.
I agree, it is politics require the use of friendly language.There are many christian minorities in muslim countries.The church has to be careful what it says. Thats why the words of local christian leaders in these countries must be balanced with their situations.
No one claims you all worship Muhammed. Muhammedism is another term we refer to Muslims by whether they like it or not. Kind of like how Muslims use the term “kafir” to refer to everybody else, whether they would agree or not.Well as a muslim i can see that probably from what i read, the message of the Pope diudnt really mean what it says or had a hidden meaning in it .
Well yr teacher lied to you or either doesnt know.
We never worshipped Muhammed PBUH . Muhammed PBUH is dead . He was human . A mortal . He was a Messanger of God .
So we arent called Muhammedans . As for heresy , well the jews Call you heretic also and lost so i guess its ok .
Peace
Meedo,Well as a muslim i can see that probably from what i read, the message of the Pope diudnt really mean what it says or had a hidden meaning in it .
if it were true that Jesus did not die, entonces, if He did not die, He must have been assumed into heaven, como su madre, or (question?) He must be more than 2000 years old, i think the differenc is almost nil. so then, the differences are in reality very small.Hawk is referring to the Muslim teaching that Jesus did not die. He thinks that the Church’s ‘acceptance’ of Muslims as holding the faith of Abraham, tends to help give credence to this false teaching. And that surely cannot be the intent of the Catechism.
you’re a smart cat. do you really live in egypt, what’s it like there?Well as a muslim i can see that probably from what i read, the message of the Pope diudnt really mean what it says or had a hidden meaning in it .
Well yr teacher lied to you or either doesnt know.
We never worshipped Muhammed PBUH . Muhammed PBUH is dead . He was human . A mortal . He was a Messanger of God .
So we arent called Muhammedans . As for heresy , well the jews Call you heretic also and lost so i guess its ok .
Peace