1
1newcatholic
Guest
It seems like an abstract and irrelevant question, doesn’t it?I will say honestly I don’t know why anyone would be too worried about this question.
The Book of Revelation is one of my specialty subjects, so I’ve spent a little bit of energy on the question. I have read scholars and others who imagine that 616 as a reference to Nero “proves” that the Apocalypse is really just the ramblings of an apocalyptic literalist who imagined that Nero was the great nemesis of the church and was clearly wrong. Nero-based readings of Revelation have influenced the way the church has interpreted Revelation for centuries–there are ancient interpretations, for example, that imagine that Nero will be ‘resurrected’ to war against the church, in contrast to “Elijah” as the forerunner of Christ.
Identifying the ‘real’ number as 616 better permits hostile readers to dismiss the last book of the Bible altogether as filled with incorrect prophecy or prediction. That’s why it is important to maintain the correct number (666) to prevent bad readings of the book which make John’s visions theologically and eschatologically irrelevant. Some people go crazy with apocalyptic numerology–that’s one reason it’s important to get the number “right.” 666 is an abstract Old Testament symbol for money, not a gematria-based reference to Nero, which means the statement John is making with the Mark of the Beast is identical to what Christ asserted: “You cannot serve both God and Money.”