A
Ana_v
Guest
Isn’t God the judge of the sinner’s life? And isn’t it the judge that decides the sentence for the sinner?Those who end up in Hell have condemned themselves. God does not send anyone to Hell.
Isn’t God the judge of the sinner’s life? And isn’t it the judge that decides the sentence for the sinner?Those who end up in Hell have condemned themselves. God does not send anyone to Hell.
Everyone who is in Hell has freely chosen to go there by dying in a state of mortal sin and rejecting God’s love.Isn’t God the judge of the sinner’s life? And isn’t it the judge that decides the sentence for the sinner?
I think I would say that rational arguments cannot compel one to believe, but they support the articles of faith as reasonable for belief.It is said that the articles of faith cannot be demonstrated to be true through reason. They are known only through Divine Revelation and must be accepted on faith.
It is also said that, while not rationally demonstrable or provable, these articles of faith can be shown to not contradict reason.
Is this an example of a teaching that is rationally demonstrable or must it be accepted on faith?
That’s a different principle in operation. @Ana_v was pointing out that offenses against greater authority carry greater penalties; you’re pointing out that those who are more culpable for their decisions are likewise more culpable for the penalties these actions bring.One must admit this works the other way around as well. For example, a teacher hitting another teacher is more serious than a 2nd grader hitting another 2nd grader, since it should be assumed that the teacher has more knowledge and responsibility than the 2nd grader.
I would argue that their ability to be more culpable is what attains them authority. How else is authority earned?you’re pointing out that those who are more culpable for their decisions are likewise more culpable for the penalties these actions bring.
Pretty difficult to be restored if you are sitting in hell with the door locked.Divine Justice is “restorative justice,” not retributive justice."
God doesn’t send people to hell, they end up their by their own rejection of God.
God’s desire is for salvation for all souls, which is why He came to us in Jesus Christ.
Jim
The ‘teacher as teacher and 2nd-grader as 2nd-grader’ example that you bring up isn’t one that hinges on authority; it’s one that hinges on personal accountability. It works equally validly and without distinction if you posited “garbage collector” or “POTUS” in place of teacher. ‘Authority’ doesn’t come into play in this example.I would argue that their ability to be more culpable is what attains them authority. How else is authority earned?
Depends on what is meant by authority and in what context. The POTUS has no authority in an Armageddon situation where there is only a small bit of food left and its survival of the fitness. That is organized authority. Some authority transcends any organization. I have more authority than a small child (unless he is yielding a gun and knows how to use it).The ‘teacher as teacher and 2nd-grader as 2nd-grader’ example that you bring up isn’t one that hinges on authority ; it’s one that hinges on personal accountability . It works equally validly and without distinction if you posited “garbage collector” or “POTUS” in place of teacher. ‘Authority’ doesn’t come into play in this example.
And on what grounds should anyone believe Julian’s personal revelation? Personal testimony is a very unreliable historical method.As Julian of Norwich was told by the Lord, in the end, all will be made right
For many unlucky people, life is no cake walkDon’t think hell is a cake walk however
Nice one! You’re the first I’ve seen on CAF appeal to this reference. I first came across it in Von Balthasar’s book on this topic.As Julian of Norwich was told by the Lord, in the end, all will be made right
This is precisely what I’ve discovered about those who advocate any form of apokatastasis or universalism, at least among the church’s great intellectuals (e.g., Gregory of Nyssa, Origen, Maximus the Confessor). Even though they advocated that all will return to God in the end, nevertheless the suffering/torment of hell will have been immense. And even the final state of those brought back to God in such a state may only be a connection to God via knowledge of Him (rather than participation in any of His heavenly gifts).Some believe that even those in hell will be brought out
Don’t think hell is a cake walk however
Well, at least we agree on one thing…On the same grounds that God sent Jesus to us
Pope Benedict XVI, Encyclical, Spe Salvi Spe salvi (November 30, 2007) | BENEDICT XVIChrist descended into “Hell” and is therefore close to those cast into it, transforming their darkness into light. Suffering and torment is still terrible and well- nigh unbearable. Yet the star of hope has risen—the anchor of the heart reaches the very throne of God. Instead of evil being unleashed within man, the light shines victorious: suffering—without ceasing to be suffering—becomes, despite everything, a hymn of praise.
Agreed. In the context of the initial example, it was about directly assaulting a person in authority qua his role as an authority. In yours, it was just comparing an adult’s culpability to a child’s.Depends on what is meant by authority and in what context.
CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA Divine Providence explains;So there we have it, forewarning and for those that continue in their sin of Blaspheme will go to Hell.
How have they condemned themselves to Hell? Hell is a punishment.Those who end up in Hell have condemned themselves. God does not send anyone to Hell.