Is there an overemphasis of community in our Worship

  • Thread starter Thread starter THurifer2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You are also at the resurrection. There are many parts of the Mass that one would not be doing at Calvary, but then the Mass is about more than Calvary. It is also about the holy ones collectively praising God, patterned on the Book of Revelation.
That is true, but there cannot be a Resurrection without the Crucifixion. Recall St. Paul’s words: “I preach Christ crucified.” While we are at the Resurrection, the Holy Sacrifice is very much about the Sacrifice of Calvary. It is unfortunate that many of our parishes today have forgotten about that.
 
While there is some truth to what you said, then-Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger made some very strong statements eregarding the “overemphasis” of community in our liturgies. When we begin to “celebrate ourselves” instead of the sacred mysteries, when “we” becomes the focus of the Mass than the Holy Sacrifice, then we have strayed very far from the liturgy.

When we applaud the choir and lose sight of what the choir was meant to be and do, then we have celebrated ourselves. Many of the hymns composed over the last 40 years call for the celebration of the community. “Gather Us In” does not have any direct references to God.

While Catholics do not exist in a vaccuum (we are a community of believers),** we cannot make the community more important than the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. **

I am eagerly awaiting what Pope Benedict will tell us when he arrives here next April. It should prove most interesting.
I believe Pope Benedict will be making very strong statements too!
Much more
than just interesting!
Pope Benedict = High Christology.
He is not in anybody’s camp nor on anyone’s side.
**He is centered on Christ, **he knows exactly what road we shoud be on at this point in history and he does not waste a lot of words to make it clear.
My two :twocents: cents worth anyway!
 
Hello,
That is true, but there cannot be a Resurrection without the Crucifixion. Recall St. Paul’s words: “I preach Christ crucified.” While we are at the Resurrection, the Holy Sacrifice is very much about the Sacrifice of Calvary. It is unfortunate that many of our parishes today have forgotten about that.
As Father Corapi says:

I don’t know about you, but on my liturgical calendar Good Friday comes before Easter Sunday. No pain, no gain; no Cross, no Crown; no gall, no glory.
 
Hello,

As Father Corapi says:

I don’t know about you, but on my liturgical calendar Good Friday comes before Easter Sunday. No pain, no gain; no Cross, no Crown; no gall, no glory.
As Stone Cold Steve Austin would say (paraphrased, of course), can you give me a BIG YES? 👍 👍 👍 😃

Believe it or not, I’m not the arch-neo Traditionalist y’all may think I am. Love the Spurs, love Duran Duran and 80s music (Brit stuff) and I do enjoy watching the Longhorns win! But, just because I love Duran Duran music, that doesn’t mean that I want to hear Save A Prayer or Ordinary World during Mass.:eek: Although, I do have visions of Simon Le Bon serving as a cantor and Nick Rhodes playing the organ. I best be going to my animal shelter benefit rock concert. I need to seriuosly let off some steam (thanks to the USCCB:eek: )
 
Post number 24 asked when was it that we began celebrating. As far as I can make out, it was in the wilderness on the way from Egypt to Canaan.
Remember that God commanded that the Hebrews celebrate the Passover meal each year in commemoration of their deliverance from bondage in Egypt. Jesus transformed the Seder meal when he celebrated Passover with the disciples for the last time in Jerusalem. “As often as you do these things…” indicates the celebration of Passover is become a memorial of a new Passover in Christ. The command to celebrate the deliverance is still the same. We have been celebrating since the Exodus.
Might I further add that the Seder is a family (tribal, community) celebration. Small families who could not afford a lamb would congregate with larger families to share the meal. This is also the basis for the Eucharist being celebrated with other community members and not the priest alone. You must never be alone in the celebration of the Passover.

Matthew
 
Post number 24 asked when was it that we began celebrating. As far as I can make out, it was in the wilderness on the way from Egypt to Canaan.
Remember that God commanded that the Hebrews celebrate the Passover meal each year in commemoration of their deliverance from bondage in Egypt. Jesus transformed the Seder meal when he celebrated Passover with the disciples for the last time in Jerusalem. “As often as you do these things…” indicates the celebration of Passover is become a memorial of a new Passover in Christ. The command to celebrate the deliverance is still the same. We have been celebrating since the Exodus.
Might I further add that the Seder is a family (tribal, community) celebration. Small families who could not afford a lamb would congregate with larger families to share the meal. This is also the basis for the Eucharist being celebrated with other community members and not the priest alone. You must never be alone in the celebration of the Passover.

Matthew
Great…wonderful…Is sin communal? Is the particular judgement a communal event? Again what is the pinnacle of focus during the holy sacrifice of the mass? Again…what if the mass is celebrated by a single mortal priest without a congregation?
 
Actually that is what you have. CA forms show the diversity that is Catholicism today. There are different opinions but while different each poster is serious about their faith. Differences in faith practices is not a bad thing.
Great this is a diverse group…no doubt. Since you are a Catholic I am almost certain that you believe Artificial Contraception is a grave matter and an intrinsic evil…right? Of course I don’t need to remind you that you are bound to believe that…right?//
 
and I do enjoy watching the Longhorns win! )
Yet the Bible says that God will saw off the horns of the wicked. tu fan? That explains a lot.😃

Seriously, you got me rejuvinated in finishing The Spirit of the Liturgy. I will comment on it in a few days when finished. So far it seems rather balanced. But then, it’s not like I am going to call the Holy Father unbalanced.
 
Post number 24 asked when was it that we began celebrating. As far as I can make out, it was in the wilderness on the way from Egypt to Canaan.
Remember that God commanded that the Hebrews celebrate the Passover meal each year in commemoration of their deliverance from bondage in Egypt. Jesus transformed the Seder meal when he celebrated Passover with the disciples for the last time in Jerusalem. “As often as you do these things…” indicates the celebration of Passover is become a memorial of a new Passover in Christ. The command to celebrate the deliverance is still the same. We have been celebrating since the Exodus.
Might I further add that the Seder is a family (tribal, community) celebration. Small families who could not afford a lamb would congregate with larger families to share the meal. This is also the basis for the Eucharist being celebrated with other community members and not the priest alone. You must never be alone in the celebration of the Passover.

Matthew
Nobody here has said anything about celebrating the Mass alone (although, in theory you are not alone because the entire Church (Triumphant, Militant and Suffering) is present. What I am trying to say, at least individually, is that when the COMMUNITY takes on a greater emphasis than the HOLY SACRIFICE, then there is a serious problem. When the hymns, like Gather Us In, Come to the Feast and O Love of God, focus on what we’re about and about US, and not on GOD, then there is a serious problem.

Matthew, have you not read any of Pope Benedict pre or post conclave works on the Liturgy?
 
But when some viewpoints are borderline heretical, then it makes me wonder. The Catholic Church is not a cafeteria. Yes, there is diversity, but not at the expense of the Faith. Your posts have repeatedly made my point.
Who’s posts in this thread as been boarderline heretical? I am just curious because I haven’t seen it.
What I am trying to say, at least individually, is that when the COMMUNITY takes on a greater emphasis than the HOLY SACRIFICE, then there is a serious problem. When the hymns, like Gather Us In, Come to the Feast and O Love of God, focus on what we’re about and about US, and not on GOD, then there is a serious problem.

Matthew, have you not read any of Pope Benedict pre or post conclave works on the Liturgy?
You can’t mandate what others think or feel is focusing on God. Is it your opinion that Come to the Feast is not focused on God but the faithful. If the Church decides to take those songs out then that’s fine but in the mean time I think it is wrong to decide if others are over emphasizing the community by what songs they pick. It seems judgmental to me.

We are diverse and learning to live with others and have faith that they feel as you do about God is much better for your own spiritual well being. None of us would be posting and spending some much time in these forums if we didn’t take our faith seriously.
 
You can’t mandate what others feel, and you shouldn’t. Yet it is wrong to support songs which can mislead people.

Most songs are just fine and some of the suspect songs can be interpreted to be just fine.
I like Lord of the Dance, even though it is about dancing it touches my heart, yet just because I like it doesn’t make it good for the liturgy. I need to put truth first above my desires. I really see nothing wrong with Lord of the Dance unless someone can point something out. (if they do I will not support it in the liturgy but for now I believe it is fine)

The problem is that there are many Catholics who don’t know their faith and they need to be taught it in the songs in the liturgy and in the homily. When songs are kinda wishy washy in teaching and can be understood to mean things that are contrary to the faith then we should eliminate them. If we misrepresent truth then we are making a lie out of our worship and if we allow others to be mislead that is a grave sin.

I have no problem with a modern song, but if is says something like “We are the bread of life”, or something similar, then I would support eliminating it. If a song needs explanation to make it conform to Catholic belief then we shouldn’t use it as people could be mislead.

We all have diverse tastes and desires but truth is the one part of our faith that we must change ourselves to. I might like to play soccer, read, and pray the rosary, those are things of taste, part of my own personality, you might like singing, listening to music, etc, we all have our own personalities. All are welcome to the Church but the truth of Christ is one thing that should be defended in every way.

(you might do it differently than I do, but it must be the same truth)

God Bless
Scylla
 
Who’s posts in this thread as been boarderline heretical? I am just curious because I haven’t seen it.

You can’t mandate what others think or feel is focusing on God. Is it your opinion that Come to the Feast is not focused on God but the faithful. If the Church decides to take those songs out then that’s fine but in the mean time I think it is wrong to decide if others are over emphasizing the community by what songs they pick. It seems judgmental to me.

We are diverse and learning to live with others and have faith that they feel as you do about God is much better for your own spiritual well being. None of us would be posting and spending some much time in these forums if we didn’t take our faith seriously.
I still stand by my statements, which, I believe, also concur with statements that the Holy Father has made about “community.” I will ask you what I asked Matthew, have you picked up and read any of Pope Benedict’s statements and writings on the Mass? If you accuse me of being judgmental, how are you going to take what he says?
 
You can’t mandate what others feel, and you shouldn’t. Yet it is wrong to support songs which can mislead people.

Ok, again. It is a matter of taste not what you or someone on here thinks might mislead people. If songs have been approved and they are in our missal who are you or anyone to say that it is misleading people?
The problem is that there are many Catholics who don’t know their faith and they need to be taught it in the songs in the liturgy and in the homily.
 
I still stand by my statements, which, I believe, also concur with statements that the Holy Father has made about “community.” I will ask you what I asked Matthew, have you picked up and read any of Pope Benedict’s statements and writings on the Mass? If you accuse me of being judgmental, how are you going to take what he says?
No I have not read it. What difference would it make if I did? I feel you have already made up your mind about Catholics “going a stray” and not doing what you want them to do or what you think is Catholic enough.
 
Oh Lord, who decides which faithful really know their faith? You talk about the faithful like they are children. I think we need to give people more credit
I really agree with you here. I do not think Catholics are as stupid as many people seem to think. I think what is misleading most Catholics are priest that are not orthodox in their faith. The unorthodox homilies are what damages the faith, not music. Where the priest is orthodox an a solid catechist, I do not think their is the danger of misinterpreting lyrics.
Again, if a song is allow than it becomes a matter of taste if a song is wishy washy or not. I like “come to the fest”
I think the line “We come to taste the presence” is on of the better lines in the newer music. But I think it is a little inaccurate to say it is a matter of taste. I think it would be better to say it is a matter of prudence and judgement.
 
No I have not read it.
I am almost done with “Spirit of the Liturgy.” It gives a good historical context for how we worship that I find helpful. In relation to this current question, there is no doubt that the Holy Father believes in a communal side of the Mass. Overemphasis is still up for grabs in this discussion.
 
No I have not read it. What difference would it make if I did? I feel you have already made up your mind about Catholics “going a stray” and not doing what you want them to do or what you think is Catholic enough.
Are Catholics going astray? Do they know the Catholic faith or are they ignorant? One thing is certain. The Church is in crisis. How many billions have seen wasted on lawsuits and scandal, properties sold off and how many discraced clergy will it take to realize it? How many priests have fallen, and bishops as well? The divorce rate among Catholics approaches that of the rest of the population, 50% plus. Catholics are equally incarcerated, addicted, aborted as the rest of the population. If we can not figure out something is astray or amiss we are blind. It all starts with worship, the means of grace. The pope seems to have figured this out and is leading the Church to remedy it, not simply in the traditional Mass restoration, but in fixing the broken novus ordo next on the agenda. Leading means he is out ahead of the pack. The pack may be resistant to following. If we had grace we would be holy, not divorced, aborted, perverted, addicted and incarcerated. The sappy songs, distorted translations and “we are special, I’m ok your ok” nonsense, may make you feel warm and fuzzy, but they are not availing us to grace. We are sinful people who plead for God’s mercy and love. We come to offer sacrifice in worship. We sacrifice a “victim”, who is Christ who offered Himself for us. Mass is not a party as it has been made to seem.
 
Are Catholics going astray? Do they know the Catholic faith or are they ignorant? One thing is certain. The Church is in crisis. How many billions have seen wasted on lawsuits and scandal, properties sold off and how many discraced clergy will it take to realize it? How many priests have fallen, and bishops as well? The divorce rate among Catholics approaches that of the rest of the population, 50% plus. Catholics are equally incarcerated, addicted, aborted as the rest of the population. If we can not figure out something is astray or amiss we are blind. It all starts with worship, the means of grace. The pope seems to have figured this out and is leading the Church to remedy it, not simply in the traditional Mass restoration, but in fixing the broken novus ordo next on the agenda. Leading means he is out ahead of the pack. The pack may be resistant to following. If we had grace we would be holy, not divorced, aborted, perverted, addicted and incarcerated. The sappy songs, distorted translations and “we are special, I’m ok your ok” nonsense, may make you feel warm and fuzzy, but they are not availing us to grace. We are sinful people who plead for God’s mercy and love. We come to offer sacrifice in worship. We sacrifice a “victim”, who is Christ who offered Himself for us. Mass is not a party as it has been made to seem.
Why do you think the Mass is the source of the problems you list? Haven’t the protestants been having the same problems? They have had a " warm fuzzy" and “happy clappy” worship style for years, why are their problems just manifesting now? Isn’t it possible that the problems are common to both because they have a common source, and not because Catholics changed the Mass?
 
Why do you think the Mass is the source of the problems you list? Haven’t the protestants been having the same problems? They have had a " warm fuzzy" and “happy clappy” worship style for years, why are their problems just manifesting now? Isn’t it possible that the problems are common to both because they have a common source, and not because Catholics changed the Mass?
There is a gap between the realization that something has gone very wrong spiritually and understanding where it happened. It is like a patient who knows he is ill, but maybe does not know the disease or the cure. If he does know the disease he might not know how he got it and he keeps returning to the source of infection. The pope seems to have figured out something is wrong with worship. That is what has gone wrong. We know this, because of the things he has said and wrote and done. He seems now determined to fix problems he recognizes in the new Mass. Why does he think there are problems? What is the evidence? The Church is in crisis. We have suffered many problems that would not have afflicted us if we were healthy and able to fend them off and repel them.

At Mass the church on earth, the pilgrim Church worships God. The worship of heaven and earth are joined. We worship with the host of heaven. It is there that heaven and earth meet, are joined. We are brought into communion with heaven at Mass. The reason that it is the same worship, one worship, in heaven and on earth is that we worship the same person, present to us body, blood, soul and divinity in heaven and on earth. Jesus ascended into heaven in his body and is worshipped there in glory, visible, face to face, by the host of heaven. He comes down to us in the same body, blood, soul and divinity, His person, at Mass and we worship Him in faith. His divinity and humanity is hidden from our eyes. He appears hidden behind the forms of bread and wine. Heaven and earth are joined, because in heaven He remains in matter, in His resurrected body. He is the source of all grace. If any person has grace, Catholic or other, it comes from Jesus who becomes present to us here on earth on the altar. We are supposed to be bearers of Christ when we leave Mass. We go in peace to love and serve, those we encounter or pray for. We become bearers of grace we receive, like Mary. If we are in crisis, this is not happening. It does not matter that Protestants are happy clappy and silly or not. We have become that also.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top