Is this inherently sinful?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CRATUS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CRATUS

Guest
To avoid someone who has different beliefs than you because they may you uncomfortable, question you own beliefs. Sometimes I wish I just kept them all to myself. It is not so much a problem in person. Online. I feel like certain forums on here. It is good to be be open to different perspectives. I am never quite set on what I think. I just want to believe something to not avoid being labeled. I feel like I am going in circles. The controversial issues within the Catholic church drive me NUTS. Whatever I believe, I am the “bad” guy. Maybe I should just not talk about God at all. Keep it to myself. Our faith is supposed to be private anyways.
 
To avoid someone who has different beliefs than you because they may you uncomfortable, question you own beliefs. Sometimes I wish I just kept them all to myself. It is not so much a problem in person. Online. I feel like certain forums on here. It is good to be be open to different perspectives. I am never quite set on what I think. I just want to believe something to not avoid being labeled. I feel like I am going in circles. The controversial issues within the Catholic church drive me NUTS. Whatever I believe, I am the “bad” guy. Maybe I should just not talk about God at all. Keep it to myself. Our faith is supposed to be private anyways.
Great post! You are describing a common symptom IMO of a lot of religious people who like to talk about their faith but take themselves so seriously they lose their patience with each other. Don’t give up. You don’t have to become like that, and being good at arguing only helps us become closer to God when we recognize the futility.

It is not sinful to avoid people with other beliefs. It is sinful to look down upon those with other beliefs, and think you’re better because you are right and they are wrong. Jesus and Paul teach much about not being about group identity or theological knowledge. But these are interesting things to discuss, and if people get hot over them, let us be the voice of peace that listens more than it talks.
 
Our faith is supposed to be private anyways.
:hmmm: what faith are you?

What if the all the apostles felt our faith is private? What if they didnt share the good news of God?

I think our Faith should be public, our own relation with Jesus can be private.
 
To avoid someone who has different beliefs than you because they may you uncomfortable, question you own beliefs. Sometimes I wish I just kept them all to myself. It is not so much a problem in person. Online. I feel like certain forums on here. It is good to be be open to different perspectives. I am never quite set on what I think. I just want to believe something to not avoid being labeled. I feel like I am going in circles. The controversial issues within the Catholic church drive me NUTS. Whatever I believe, I am the “bad” guy. Maybe I should just not talk about God at all.
Then you will never be able to get to The TRUTH!

Our faith is supposed to be private anyways.
Not according to the Bible.
 
:hmmm: what faith are you?

What if the all the apostles felt our faith is private? What if they didnt share the good news of God?

I think our Faith should be public, our own relation with Jesus can be private.
Depends on what you mean by faith. If you mean nit-picking over arcane discussions that have been had every day for hundreds of years, and considering our knowledge of Catholic dogma a measure of your ability to spread the Good News, consider Paul’s simplified message and what constituted “faith” for him:

1 Cor 1:
18 The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 19 For it is written:

“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise,
and the learning of the learned I will set aside.”

20 Where is the wise one? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made the wisdom of the world foolish? 21 *For since in the wisdom of God the world did not come to know God through wisdom, it was the will of God through the foolishness of the proclamation to save those who have faith.

22 For Jews demand signs and Greeks look for wisdom, 23 but we proclaim Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles, 24 but to those who are called, Jews and Greeks alike, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. 25 For the foolishness of God is wiser than human wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than human strength.*
 
You’re okay. You just need to relax a little. Take things a little more slowly. If you were willing to submit yourself to the authority of the Church first and foremost, then you wouldn’t even be all that concerned, although I realize simply saying “I’ll submit myself and my judgment to Holy Mother Church!” isn’t just going to work like turning on a light.

Do you have a copy of Protagoras available to you? If not, google it, and read the first few pages between Socrates and Hippocrates, on whether or not Hippocrates should be going off to Protagoras.

Socrates shows him in beautiful detail why the nourishment of the soul (knowledge) is of vastly greater import than the nourishment of the body (food), and yet, people treat them just the opposite! They regard carefully their food and yet intake all sorts of knowledge without knowing whether it’s good or not! Hippocrates needs a wise teacher like Socrates to distinguish between good and bad.

Similarly, we can trust in the Church as analogous (and even far surpassing) Socrates, and ourselves as young, naive Hippocrates, always having fluctuating opinions, very vain and self-conceited, thinking that we know best, as though the many lines of Scripture which preach against us (do not be wise in your own eyes, there is a way that seems good to a man but its end is the way of death, there was no king in Israel in those days and each man did what was good according to his own eyes) do not actually refer to us, but to some amorphous blob we call “other people.”

Regards the opinion that faith should be private. That is incorrect. It is not even sufficient to live our faith without ever witnessing to it by mouth, either. From the Manual of Indulgences

“…nor is it sufficient that they practice the apostolate of good example. The purpose for which they are established, the purpose for which they are present, is to proclaim Christ to their non-Christian fellow citizens by word and deed and to help them to receive Christ fully.” Emphasis mine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top