X
Xanthippe_Voorhees
Guest
Why are material goods more important to you than spiritual goods?
I’m pretty sure that God would not want me to be homeless or have my children or I starve to death.
Why are material goods more important to you than spiritual goods?
More or less…yeah…that’s where we’re at financially. If you calculate what we must do to keep our home decent. (And put in reserve because we are responsible for repairs) If you add in vehicles that we need to get to the work and store. What we must save to pay our medical bills now that Obama care has steamrolled our healthcare. What we owe in “just” taxes to the government. There’s not much left over. We run a tight ship.Do you literally only spend money on food, shelter, clothing, and medicine and after those expenses you have NO money at all left over?
I’m not trying to be offensive but I see this kind of debt avoidance as immoral. God made it very clear that we were to pay those we owed and not “stiff” them. Even though it seems harmless…I see paying money owed to the electric or bank as no different than if I owed my mother or my priest. I would not do that to them. So I do not do that to a “corporation”.No, it’s just low middleclass. We did with less for a family of three for a while. We didn’t like it, but it was doable so long as you know how long you can get away with not paying each bill (this differs depending on what the bill is paying. For instance, you should have at least 3 months before a house forecloses, and there are various processes that can extend the time to much more. Meanwhile, if you go without paying a car note for 2 months, then they threaten to take it. Of course, a lot of phone calls saying this or that but it doesn’t usually happen as soon as they say it will).
Of course. If you’re in a spot where you can’t help it than it’s not sinful, or if it is the sin is lessened by circumstance.It’s not avoidance if you can’t afford to pay it…it’s also not avoidance for the most part but figuring out when you could pay x bill and wait for that time to pay it.
On this, we agree.But the fact that so much money makes one considered, in your eyes, “borderline poor” just demonstrates how blessed we are to live in present day America.
Because it takes people with disposable income and time to have the resources to do those kinds of activities. The majority of people on public assistance are children or parents of children. Those folks are both time and money poor.I found it interesting that the people there were folks at the higher end of the income bracket; I understand having to work on the weekends at times, but didn’t see any of the folks who come in and take from the food donation boxes
To be fair, it is too much. At nearly $6,000 for tuition and then the expenses of uniforms, field trips, lunches, fundraisers, and a volunteer commitment we end up sacrificing time with our children in order to afford a Catholic education.You’re to be commended for paying the tuition for your kids and not saying it’s too much and sending them to public school like some people I know.
Someone setting fires is clearly not a person who should be volunteering anywhere.Um, yeah. The hobo whose entire daily activities consist of wandering around town, setting fires in parks, and other things is too “time poor” to come by and even pull some weeds?
My point is that, for the most part, I don’t believe that to be true.My point was this: people who aren’t time starved yet feel free to take are unwilling to give back.