Hey everyone. I recently learned that in China, it is a common practice to kill cats and dogs for their fur. I am thoroughly disgusted by this myself. But anyway, is it moral or immoral? Here are the relevant passages of the Catechism of the Catholic Church:
First, in paragraph 2416, we see that mankind owes animals kindness. Then, in paragraph 2417, we see that it is legitimate to use animals for food and clothing. Finally, in paragraph 2418, we see that it is contrary to human dignity to cause animals to suffer or die needlessly. Therefore, I think it would be correct to say that it is only okay to kill an animal for its fur if it the fur is needed for clothing! However, that simply is not the case in the vast majority of the world. It is well known that fur is primarily a luxury item. We have plenty of clothing available and the vast majority of this clothing comes from plants such as cotton and synthetic materials. Therefore, can the fur trade even be justified? Personally, I am not sure. I don’t think it can in the vast majority of cases. It might be justified for someone living in a very cold climate where it is next to impossible to import other clothing and the only plentiful resource is animals that could be killed for clothing.
However, if animals are to be killed for their fur, I think it would be prudent to also use the rest of the animal for food. Unfortunately, I think that most fur companies do not do this. Most of the time the animals are simply skinned, sometimes alive (which is extremely cruel), and then their fur is prepared and sold. The meat simply goes to waste. To me, that is wrong. If an animal must be killed for its clothing then its meat should be put to use as well, if only to feed those who are very poor.
What do you think about all of this? Can the fur trade be justified?