LilyM;10428368 said:
“How wrong you are. I use plenty of sacramentals, and in particular love my collection of Rosary beads which are used in praying my daily Rosary. My understanding of the definition of a sacramental was faulty. Point taken.”
How do you reconcile this with your previous statements:
Some people are called by God to a life of prayer. The Lord calls them and they are obedient.
Code:
You make all these leaps and bounds contradicting yourself accusing those who are called to a life of prayer as if it is an affliction. Yet you don't even know what sacramentals are.
And you accuse me of supporting street gangs and Satantists?
The topic of this thread is "Is yoga demonic or no."
Yoga itself is born from a pagan religion that pays homage to demons. Some Catholics and Christians, and others have become possessed from practicing Kundalini yoga.
The demon of Kundalini stated in an exorcism "the more painful the position and posture I force this person into the more comfortable it is for me."
Actually the more a demon tortures a person the more it is punished by God; but it's hate for humans is satisfied. Hate that a person can't even imagine.
What the Church worries about is the spirituality that is imparted in learning and practicing yoga.
It is like stretching and breathing techniques are confined to yoga and yoga is the only way.
And, I can discuss this without making ad hominens.
Seriously, I don't understand why sacramentals and sacraments or the practice there of by Catholics is brought to the table here.
It is almost as if some equate Catholic religious practices on the same level as yoga and have the audacity to do so in a Catholic Spirituality forum.
Yoga is a spiritual & physical practice, true yoga that is. Yoga is derived from Hinduism which is a pagan religion that worships demons.
You can't deny that yoga is inspired by demons.
To refute the last 3 statements is just lying to one's self.
I have posted several posts with documents that discuss yoga written by Catholic priests and Cardinal Ratzinger but near one proponent of yoga practice has even read one.
There is a hidden agenda to promote yoga practice and completely ignore the Church's warnings that prevails in this thread.
Lastly, just look at India and the horrible state of that country have to live in. Hinduism has foster poverty, ignorance, disease, and filth. Don't believe me, go and see. Drink from the Ganges as bodies float by.
The world emerged from a great darkness because some nations embraced Christ. And I am certain many will disagree with this. But it is true.
BP
Where to start? Ok - first of all you do not appear to know the difference between USE of something and ABuse or MISuse of it. I suggest you acquaint yourself with the dictionary definitions of those words. I can quite consistently say that I use sacramentals often while at the same time they can be misused or abused by others.
The point is that to breathe in a certain way or put my body in certain postures is, like any spiritual practice, something that can be either used or misused/abused.
Then please kindly reread the posted excerpts of documents which state
a) the church rejects nothing which is good in other religions - including Hinduism; and
b) Eastern meditation techniques (which includes such things as Zen and the meditation techniques of yoga) may be profitably used by Christians - ie they are not in and of themselves wrong.
Now a simple logical process:
A) burning incense as an act of worship to the One True God = good
B) burning incense because it smells pretty = morally neutral
C) burning incense as an act if worship to a false god = bad
In the same way:
A) doing physical exercise and breathing (including yoga-style techniques) as a means of enhancing one’s worship of the one true God (as documents provided by previous posters have told us is permissible) = good
B) doing yoga-style exercise and breathing as a means purely of enhancing one’s physical
well being = morally neutral
C) doing the same as an act of worship to a false god = wrong.
NB: one does not worship without the comscious intent of doing so, otherwise no-one would be able to enact, for example, a scene of a child’s baptism on stage or screen without the poor infant really being baptised, at least sometimes!