Islam: A Pagan Rooted Religion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holly3278
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
H

Holly3278

Guest
Hello everyone. I have heard claims that Islam is basically a mixture between the Pagan religion of the Arabs and Christianity. Is this true? Someone told me that Muhammad was a worshiper of the moon god and that he basically made this moon god into the sole deity of his new religion, Islam. I don’t know whether to believe this or not. What do the ancient Christians of the time say about Islam? :confused:
 
He grew up surrounded by pagan influences and in an area where
heresies had sprung.
Judaism and Christianity were the only religions which forced themselves upon Muhammed’s consciousness and with the general characteristics of which he was acquainted. He never read any part of the Old or New Testament: his references to Christianity show that his knowledge of the Bible was derived from hearsay and that his informants were not representative of the great religious sects:
Muhammed’s account of Jesus and His work, as given in the Qoran, is based upon the apocryphal accretions which grew round the Christian doctrine.
Read more here…fullbooks.com/Christianity-and-Islam.html

Also read The Great and Enduring Heresy of Mohammed Chapter 4 of The Great Heresies, by Hilaire Belloc. ewtn.com/library/HOMELIBR/HERESY4.TXT

ewtn.com/library/HOMELIBR/HERESY4.TXT
 
True enough for a short explaination except to clarify that the moon god was one of many and understood by some to have held the highest honor among all of the pagan gods at the time. As Mohamed went around the Kabba the first time after entering Mecca militarily, he is reported to have pushed over each idol with his staff saying “there is no god but allah”.

Mohamed was influenced by the Jews and Christains so monotheism was not unknown to him. Obviously he was influenced by the pagan practices for which Mecca was known and administered to by his own clan. Many of the pre-islamic pagan traditions remained however; like the sacred pilgrimage to and circumbobulation of the Kabba, veneration of the black stone, throwing stones at the devil and other things that must be done during a hajj.

Some may point to Christianity’s adoption of pagan winter and spring festivals that we now know as Easter amd Christmas among others to be similar to Islams adoption of it’s pagan roots, but I don’t see it that way exactly. It shares the same result in that it makes it more inviting for converts; to retain practices they were familiar with, but the Christian meanings of the festivals diminished the pagan root to the accomodate why the faithfull can justly celebrate it.

The black stone was worshiped before Islam a noted by some first century writers. One of Mohameds closest companions had doubts.
Ibn 'Umar (Allah be pleased with them) reported that Umar (Allah be pleased with him) kissed the stone and said: I am kissing you, whereas I know that you are a stone, but I saw Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) kissing you (that Is why I kiss you). (Book #007, Hadith #2913)~Muslim
Pagan tradition held it was pure white when it fell from the sky and it absorbs the sin of those who kiss it making it pure black. Maybe a muslim here will confirm or deny if that is still the belief.
 
Hello everyone. I have heard claims that Islam is basically a mixture between the Pagan religion of the Arabs and Christianity. Is this true? Someone told me that Muhammad was a worshiper of the moon god and that he basically made this moon god into the sole deity of his new religion, Islam. I don’t know whether to believe this or not. ** What do the ancient Christians of the time say about Islam?** :confused:
Well it weren’t around before Paul spoke these words, and since Mohammed claimed to see an Angel, then they conflict with Saint Paul’s words, I do believe Mohamed saw the angel of light, the devil himself.
**
Epistle Of Saint Paul To The Galatians**1:8

**But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema. **
 
Muslims want to submit themselves to Allah, the Arabic name for the God of Abraham. They, I think, misunderstand the true nature of God, but they definitley do not worship a moon God any more than Christians worship 3 gods (which they understand us to do when we speak of Trintiy). Both sides can cast stones at each other all day long and never learn anything about the other. I think the sources you have been referenced above are just that, stone casters. I suggest you may wish to ask Muslims themselves. You will find that they are decidely unChristian, much closer to Judaism than Christianity in my opinion, even though they claim to honor Jesus as a prophet and look forward to his second coming. But I don’t think they are followers of Satan either, and seek to be righteous before God as they understand him to have directed them through the message he gave to Muhammad. They believe that this same basic message was given to Jesus and to all the prophets of the what we call the Old Testament, and that message is basically to submit one’s life to God and serve him and him only and to flee from anything to do with Satan.

The ritual practice of that, be it worship on the Saturday sabbath or the Jews with temple sacrifices or saying prayers as Muslims are supposed to do 5 times a day and other strict behavioral practices may very as God’s message is delivered to a particular culture or group of people.
 
Muslims want to submit themselves to Allah, the Arabic name for the God of Abraham.
Allah was not associated with Abraham pre-mohamed.
Who is Allah?
Many people assume that the God of the Bible and the God of the Koran are the same God—just with different names. However, up until the seventh century when Mohammed announced Allah as the only one true God, “Allah” was the name of the widely worshipped moon god throughout ancient Mesopotamia.[9] This adaptation from pre-Islamic Arabia can be verified, “Allah is found…in Arabic inscriptions prior to Islam”[10] In order to accommodate the pagan population in Arabia, he chose Allah, the prominent moon god (who was married to the sun goddess), from the many celestial gods. “Allah is a contraction of al-llah, an old Kaaba god.”[11] It is no wonder the Arab scholar Nazar-Ali has observed: “Islam retained many aspects of pagan religion”[12] It is “heathenism in monotheistic form.”[13] No wonder the crescent moon is the symbol of Islam! And no wonder a pilgrimage to the black Kaaba stone is one of the Five Pillars (requirements) of Islam till this day.[14] Mohammed’s monotheism was merely the declaration that Allah was the greatest god in a pantheon of pagan gods! Although second- and third-century Christians had incorporated some pagan notions into their belief concerning the God of Abraham, Allah was not the further revelation of the true God of Jews and Christians. bible411.com/newsletters/nb9711.htm#en10
Revisionist history is not new.
I think the sources you have been referenced above are just that, stone casters. I suggest you may wish to ask Muslims themselves.
It was not unwarranted accusations Jesus prevented the men from throwing at the woman in the NT. Muslims are free to respond in their own defense.
But I don’t think they are followers of Satan either, and seek to be righteous before God as they understand him to have directed them through the message he gave to Muhammad.
Your statement indicates you accept God spoke to Muhamed in reality even if Muslims/Mohamed misunderstand God. Do you believe that?
The ritual practice of that, be it worship on the Saturday sabbath or the Jews with temple sacrifices or saying prayers as Muslims are supposed to do 5 times a day and other strict behavioral practices may very as God’s message is delivered to a particular culture or group of people.
What a bizarre position for a Christian pastor to take. Not withstanding your departure from the Catholic Church, Christianity as a whole accepts the prophetic age ended with Christ.

If you accept Mohameds claim, you might as well accept Joseph Smith’s. If you accept them you invalidate Jesus and Christianity. I do not see a gray area.
 
From THIS Christian website.

*“And what about the 10 to 12 million Arab Christians today? They have been calling God ‘Allah’ in their Bibles, hymns, poems, writings, and worship for over **nineteen **centuries.” *

So quick, someone better tell these guys that for the last 1,900 years they’ve been worshipping a Pagan god…
 
Muslims want to submit themselves to Allah, the Arabic name for the God of Abraham. They, I think, misunderstand the true nature of God, but they definitley do not worship a moon God any more than Christians worship 3 gods (which they understand us to do when we speak of Trintiy). Both sides can cast stones at each other all day long and never learn anything about the other. I think the sources you have been referenced above are just that, stone casters. I suggest you may wish to ask Muslims themselves. You will find that they are decidely unChristian, much closer to Judaism than Christianity in my opinion, even though they claim to honor Jesus as a prophet and look forward to his second coming. But I don’t think they are followers of Satan either, and seek to be righteous before God as they understand him to have directed them through the message he gave to Muhammad. They believe that this same basic message was given to Jesus and to all the prophets of the what we call the Old Testament, and that message is basically to submit one’s life to God and serve him and him only and to flee from anything to do with Satan.

The ritual practice of that, be it worship on the Saturday sabbath or the Jews with temple sacrifices or saying prayers as Muslims are supposed to do 5 times a day and other strict behavioral practices may very as God’s message is delivered to a particular culture or group of people.
Yes that is what we believe. this moon god thing is a polemic invention.
 
From THIS Christian website.

*“And what about the 10 to 12 million Arab Christians today? They have been calling God ‘Allah’ in their Bibles, hymns, poems, writings, and worship for over **nineteen ***centuries.”

So quick, someone better tell these guys that for the last 1,900 years they’ve been worshipping a Pagan god…
Give an Islamic website or reference that shows the name allah was associated with Abraham and the God that spoke with him.

There are first and second century writers that speak of the Arabs worhiping a stone, but not a monotheistic god allah. Muslims claim the pre-Islamic tradition suggests Abraham built the kabba and dug the nearby well with Ishmael, but no other pre-Islamic sources confirm that. Most sources and logic reason that after Ishmael was born, Abraham was an old man and did not travel so far south into Arabia, but stayed in the area of Israel and Jerusalem.

Dhimmitude is a valid reason why allah has become a common and generic term for God in the middle east. History and reason does not support the pre-Mohamed use of allah for the God of Abraham. Muslims may call it myth and polemics…but truth is harder to dismiss than that.
 
Hello everyone. I have heard claims that Islam is basically a mixture between the Pagan religion of the Arabs and Christianity. Is this true?

no, Islam is a mixture of OT, Mishna, Talmud, some NT and lots of apocrypha and legends.
Someone told me that Muhammad was a worshiper of the moon god and that he basically made this moon god into the sole deity of his new religion, Islam. I don’t know whether to believe this or not.
 
Your statement indicates you accept God spoke to Muhamed in reality even if Muslims/Mohamed misunderstand God. Do you believe that?

What a bizarre position for a Christian pastor to take. Not withstanding your departure from the Catholic Church, Christianity as a whole accepts the prophetic age ended with Christ.

If you accept Mohameds claim, you might as well accept Joseph Smith’s. If you accept them you invalidate Jesus and Christianity. I do not see a gray area.
What I do and do not believe with regard to Islam, Mohammed, et. al. is really irrelevant. The question about the rooting of Islam is not about whether I think that Muhammad really received a angelic message from God, created it out of who cloth, or pieced together bits and pieces of Jewish and Christian theology that he heard in travelling about to create something that is only tangentially connected to either. The question is whether or not Islam is rooted in paganism, and it seems to be no more rooted in paganism than (to use the comparison that you did) Mormonism is rooted in American Indian religions. Doesn’t mean that there was no contact there, just like Christianity had contact with Mythraism and Judaism with Baalism. But having contact with a religion, and even being influence as both Christianity and Judaism were, does not mean that that is where its roots are. So too, Islam’s roots are not in paganism. If you don’t understand that, then either you don’t understand Isalm, or you simply don’t understand the meaning of the word “roots”.
 
Give an Islamic website or reference that shows the name allah was associated with Abraham and the God that spoke with him.

There are first and second century writers that speak of the Arabs worhiping a stone, but not a monotheistic god allah. Muslims claim the pre-Islamic tradition suggests Abraham built the kabba and dug the nearby well with Ishmael, but no other pre-Islamic sources confirm that. Most sources and logic reason that after Ishmael was born, Abraham was an old man and did not travel so far south into Arabia, but stayed in the area of Israel and Jerusalem.

Dhimmitude is a valid reason why allah has become a common and generic term for God in the middle east. History and reason does not support the pre-Mohamed use of allah for the God of Abraham. Muslims may call it myth and polemics…but truth is harder to dismiss than that.
You are using etymology in an in appropriate way. Late me illustrate this by referring to a Turkish bible. My Turkish bible, one sold by the International Bible Society for Christians to spread the faith to Turkish speakers, uses the word Tanri to refer to the God of the Old and New Testaments. In the beginning, Tanri created the heavens and the earth. And Tanri so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son… Yet, the word Tanri in Turkish comes from another relgiion, not either Judaism nor Christianity.
Tanri is an ancient Turkish word. Shamanism was the religion of Turks before Islam. They used “Tanri” as “Sky God”. Tanri comes from tengri: Wikipedia article on Tengri. So, just as Christian Turks and Jewish Turks have adopted the use of this term “Tanri” to refer to the God of Abraham, though it originally referred to pagan Sky God, so to Mohammad adopted this Arab word “Allah” that had been used by pagans to refer to the God that he believed was the God of Abraham.
By your reasoning, if Allah must still be understood to be a reference to this pagan god of the Arabs pre-Muhammad and pre-Isalm, then Tanri must still be understood to be a reference to this pagan god of the Turks pre-Christianity. And I have a Bible that declares Jesus to be the son of this pagan god as well.
 
You are using etymology in an in appropriate way.
No, I am not using it at all. G-d has no name but we know him as Father through Christ. There is only One God, one Truth, one Word and it cannot contradict itself to be True.

Let me illustrate by pointing out how simple the Truth really is. It doesn’t matter which translation in any language the Gospels and OT are reproduced. It is why it has been so successfull. Whether it matches the nuance and sophistication of a DR or NJB, or the simple Gideon found almost everywhere in the US. It is the Word, not the words. It is the idea, not the translation.
…to pagan Sky God, so to Mohammad adopted this Arab word “Allah” that had been used by pagans to refer to the God that he believed was the God of Abraham.
Just because the guy on the corner says it’s a Rolex watch doesn’t make it true even if I believe him and go through life oblivious to the truth. Here is the difference. God has to be true. I shouldn’t have to give you the reason why Jesus Christ is the promise delivered to humanity, and why anything contrary to that messege can rightly be rejected, but you don’t seem to know it.
By your reasoning, if Allah must still be understood to be a reference to this pagan god of the Arabs pre-Muhammad and pre-Isalm, then Tanri must still be understood to be a reference to this pagan god of the Turks pre-Christianity. And I have a Bible that declares Jesus to be the son of this pagan god as well.
Many of the Christians in Arabia in Mohameds day were of sects that denied the divinity of Jesus. His first wiifes uncle was such a Christian. This same uncle married them and was the one who told Mohamed about his first visitation at Hira and being a prophet. The uncle never converted to Islam.

I never suggested and do not believe Mohamed understood it as the pagan moon god elevated to the God of Abraham. Your explainaton expalins it well enough as to how a word can morph its meaning. I think something extraordinary happened to Mohamed. Yes, Satan was the one who tossed him about in the cave, not Gabriel. Satan spoke many things to him that are in the Quran. Satan lied and allowed Mohamed to beleive he was sent by God.

This does not mean Muslims worship Satan. They do not. They do worship God by default in a way, not a moon god allah or a pagan god at all. It is their idea of God that Mohamed taught them that is wrong and misguided. Mohamed does not deserve all of the blame but he has his share. Satan has mocked Gods messege using Mohamed with a perversion of his own. He says so right in the Quran.
(Iblees (Satan)) said: “See? This one whom You have honoured above me, if You give me respite (keep me alive) to the Day of Resurrection, I will surely seize and mislead his offspring (by sending them astray) all but a few!”
( سورة الإسراء , Al-Isra, Chapter #17, Verse #62)
I sincerly believe Muslims think they know the God of Abraham, but they know Him through a deeply flawed man who clearly did not know God who was influenced by fear and threat and such is his messege. People like Luther and Thomas studied God for years to form their views. Right or wrong they had some understanding of God that Mohamed was oblivious to.

Being uneducated does not always mean ignorant, but I think it applies to Moahmed. Being ignorant does not mean one can’t be charasmatic, and I think he was to a degree. I don’t think Islam is rooted in paganism. I think it is paganism with a veneer of God to give it a false legitimacy. Mohamed was not a prophet of God- he was deceived by the Adversary…he didn’t buy a Rolex but a cheap immitation.
 
I sincerly believe Muslims think they know the God of Abraham, but they know Him through a deeply flawed man who clearly did not know God who was influenced by fear and threat and such is his messege.
The first part is what I have already said. So, I don’t know why you so strenously object to what I have said, when it seems you are saying the exact same thing as I have.

But whether we see eye-to-eye, again, is not the issue. The question is whether or not Islam is a pagan-rooted religion. By your own testimony it is not rooted there.

It is flawed. It is imperfect. It does not have the whole truth about God, and certainly distorts the truth regarding Jesus Christ. These things equal error, heresy, and false teachings, but that is not the same as paganism.
from The American Heritage Dictionary
pa·gan (pgn) KEY
NOUN:
  1. One who is not a Christian, Muslim, or Jew, especially a worshiper of a polytheistic religion.
  2. One who has no religion.
  3. A non-Christian.
  4. A hedonist.
  5. A Neo-Pagan.
from the New Advent Encyclopedia
Paganism, in the broadest sense includes all religions other than the true one revealed by God, and, in a narrower sense, all except Christianity, Judaism, and Mohammedanism. The term is also used as the equivalent of Polytheism.
It is derived from the Latin pagus, whence pagani (i.e. those who live in the country), a name given to the country folk who remained heathen after the cities had become Christian.
 
But whether we see eye-to-eye, again, is not the issue. The question is whether or not Islam is a pagan-rooted religion. By your own testimony it is not rooted there.
It should be an issue to be honest and you misunderstand what I said. It is a paradox in that though they do not know God they think they do but worship Him in a pagan way.
It is flawed. It is imperfect. It does not have the whole truth about God, and certainly distorts the truth regarding Jesus Christ. These things equal error, heresy, and false teachings, but that is not the same as paganism.
Even the New Advent is wrong to list Mohammedanism as excluded. Wrong in the sense it gives Islam a pass at its pagan practices.

It could only be flawed if it was based in truth to begin with, otherwise it is just wrong. It is imperfect for the same reason. It is a complete rejection of Jesus, not a distortion. By denying His divinity it rejects it all. It’s a sad fact. I will not water down the Truth of Christ to placate Islam. Islam waters it down to be included and I reject that outright.

The error, heresy and false teachings in Islam are only one side of the coin. The Wiccan faith is just as wrong as Islam in that sense. The other side are the pagan practices of the hajj which have been incorporated into an illigitimate association with God. Just because Islam invokes the names of figures in Judaism and Christianity does not give them the legitiamcy of the true faith revealed by God. If Muslims accepted the OT like Christians it might have some validity, but they do not. The OT confirms my faith, not contradicts it like it does Islam. If Muslims accepted the NT like Christians do they might have some authority. They do not. What they say is Islam accepts the what was revealed before…but think it has been corrupted and is unreliable. Either you accept it or you don’t. That is like me saying to you “I trust you, but I know you lie.” It makes no sense and is rightfully rejected.

As far as I know Mormonism does not incorporate pagan rituals of the American Indian though you suggested it originated there. I think it was a fabrication by Smith. They are ‘only’ a heresy religion. Islam adopted in full many of the pagan practices used in Mohameds day before Islam and they are practiced today. There is no Truth in Islam like you seem to give it. There is no depth to Islams understanding of God. It is only by the veneer of God in Islam that permits the Church to recognize the points in which it has in that the One God, and the Last Day are the only similarities, and they are surface deep only as well.

If you believe in Jesus Christ as Truth, you must reject Mohamed as false. Despite the many obvious pagan practices that remain in Islam do you think the method and purpose of prayer by Muslims is in line with God as Jesus taught? Do you think Mohamed was a good example for either representing God or instructing man?

I am not sure why you are trying to give Islam the legitiamcy they desire unjustly. Is it because many peacefull Muslims are included in the anti-Islam rehetoric that might cause them to loose their peace? It’s a valid concern which is why the Church is carefull to what it says. It acknowledges the veneer only. It has never recognized the Quran allah as God and does not acknowledge Mohamed as a prophet ever in any way. It only recognizes the two points of Oneness and the Last Day that Muslims recognize. The recognition of Jesus and Mary are conditional because Islam qualifies them so severely. If not for invoking the names of Abraham, Moses or Jesus…Islam is nothing more than a Pagan religion.
 
It is a complete rejection of Jesus, not a distortion. By denying His divinity it rejects it all. It’s a sad fact. I will not water down the Truth of Christ to placate Islam. Islam waters it down to be included and I reject that outright.
On that we concur. What has that to do with answer to the question in the title of this thread?
If you believe in Jesus Christ as Truth, you must reject Mohamed as false.
Fine, but not all false religions are pagan, that is not the generally accepted meaning of that term.
I am not sure why you are trying to give Islam the legitiamcy they desire unjustly. Is it because many peacefull Muslims are included in the anti-Islam rehetoric that might cause them to loose their peace? It’s a valid concern which is why the Church is carefull to what it says. It acknowledges the veneer only. It has never recognized the Quran allah as God and does not acknowledge Mohamed as a prophet ever in any way. It only recognizes the two points of Oneness and the Last Day that Muslims recognize. The recognition of Jesus and Mary are conditional because Islam qualifies them so severely. If not for invoking the names of Abraham, Moses or Jesus…Islam is nothing more than a Pagan religion.
Do you suggest that Buddhism is also a pagan religion? I don’t consider Mormonism to be Christian in the slightest. It is an utter distortion of the truth. It seems to be the fabrication of one man who, at best, used the Bible as a springboard to his own false theology. I tend to view the development of the Qu’ran in much the same way I do the book of Mormon, as collections of half-truths frequently spiced with complete untruths. But just because they are non-Christian doesn’t make either Mormonism nor Islam pagan.

And the practice of throwing stones at a black rock is no more of a pagan ritual than giving brightly colored eggs to one another or hanging lights on fir trees.
 
On that we concur. What has that to do with answer to the question in the title of this thread?
Nothing. It had to do with post #12. Your response above seems in conflcit with it.
Fine, but not all false religions are pagan, that is not the generally accepted meaning of that term.
I accept the New Advent definition you quoted with a noted exception to exclude Mohamed. Do you not believe in what you source? You said earlier:
What I do and do not believe with regard to Islam, Mohammed, et. al. is really irrelevant.

It is relevant.
from the New Advent Encyclopedia
Paganism, in the broadest sense includes all religions other than the true one revealed by God, and, in a narrower sense, all except Christianity, Judaism, and Mohammedanism. The term is also used as the equivalent of Polytheism.
I do not believe it was God that influenced him and do not accept the words of allah. You seem unsure.
Do you suggest that Buddhism is also a pagan religion?
Yes, see New Advent for definition of paganism. I’m kidding- sort of. I don’t know enough about it other than it does not have supposed divine doctrine that says “kill the unbeliever” in a number of ways for a variety of reasons in its ideology and/or philosophy. Right now the one that does has my attention.
I don’t consider Mormonism to be Christian in the slightest.
It is heresy not born of paganism but imagination and ambition.
I tend to view the development of the Qu’ran in much the same way I do the book of Mormon, as collections of half-truths frequently spiced with complete untruths.
I suggest you study them better.
But just because they are non-Christian doesn’t make either Mormonism nor Islam pagan.
To be clear Momonism is heresy, Islam is paganism with a qualifier.
And the practice of throwing stones at a black rock is no more of a pagan ritual than giving brightly colored eggs to one another or hanging lights on fir trees.
The difference between them is immense. The first is fun for kids and the second looks nice that time of year. Commercialism not withstanding of the secular society adopting the religious celebration and not the other way around. What kind of pastor you are, I wonder.

Do you know what happens on a hajj? I can offer a few titles if you like but google will give fair information if you sift through it. I found this a little different and interesting and germane.

islamcentral.org/Makanalislam/tips_for_hajj.html
What do you think?
 
If you use that part of the New Advent encyclopedia that says:
Paganism, in the broadest sense includes all religions other than the true one revealed by God,
Then Islam, Mormonism, Buddhism, perhaps even Judaism would have to be considered pagan.

If one uses the part of the definition which says:
Paganism…includes…in a narrower sense, all except Christianity, Judaism, and Mohammedanism.
Then obviously Islam is not rooted in paganism, but Buddism and Mormonism are pagan religions.

And if one uses the part of the definition which says
The term [paganish] is also used as the equivalent of Polytheism.
Then not even Hinduism is pagan, let alone Islam which certainly worships only one God. But Mormonism would be for it believes that each person becomes a god of their own personal world elsewhere.

So, which definition are you using?

You describe Mormonism as heresy, not born of paganism but imagination and ambition. Half of the Book of Mormon comes from American Indian traditions and religions, the other half blatant plagarism of the KJV with the whole thing filtered through the lens of masonry (which I think has pagan roots as well), so how can you say that it isn’t born of paganism, and yet claim that Islam is?
And the practice of throwing stones at a black rock is no more of a pagan ritual than giving brightly colored eggs to one another or hanging lights on fir trees.
I wasn’t referecing secular commercialism at all. You made reference to the ka’aba in previous posts, I assumed because of its association with pagan worship before the time of Muhammed. I merely referenced some other items that were at one time associated with pagan worship. Items that I doubt you would find as evidence of paganism today. Similarly, the history of the ka’aba no more makes it a pagan symbol today than the history of colored eggs and lights on fir trees make them pagan symbols today.
 
If you use that part of the New Advent encyclopedia that says…

So, which definition are you using?
Either you do not read what I wrote a number of times in this thread or you do not comprehend it or a mixture. In your efforts to be so multi-cultural accepting of anything and everything you marginalize your Christian faith. What part of the “true one revealed by God” would exclude Judaism?
You describe Mormonism as heresy, not born of paganism but imagination and ambition. Half of the Book of Mormon comes from American Indian traditions and religions, the other half blatant plagarism of the KJV with the whole thing filtered through the lens of masonry (which I think has pagan roots as well), so how can you say that it isn’t born of paganism, and yet claim that Islam is?
It’s roots came from the NT and it’s dogma from a tophat and imaginary gold plates.
I merely referenced some other items that were at one time associated with pagan worship. Items that I doubt you would find as evidence of paganism today. Similarly, the history of the ka’aba no more makes it a pagan symbol today than the history of colored eggs and lights on fir trees make them pagan symbols today.
Yea, Ok, I’m done with you here. I’d just repeat myself to answer this and most of your other points and you don’t answer most direct questions.

I worry for your flock if you have one. I suggets you re-examine your faith to keep Christ in His rightfull place since you so often lower Him to make an obscure and invalid point(s). My best advice would be for you to speak to a Catholic priest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top