I
IgnatianPhilo
Guest
In order to effectively dismiss and argue against a doctrine, one should have an indepth knowledge of such a doctrine. General terms and mistakes will not convince anyone and it is reasonable to suggest an error on the author of the quran, given the implied belief Mary is a part of the trinity. As I said collyridians were not prominent and probably didnt exist, very small chance and we don’t know if they even had her as apart of their trinity.The Quran doesn’t need any knowledge about the trinity except what is obvious to the layman. That there is a doctrine called the trinity. And that the Trinity is an essence of God for some people in this world . You dont need to understand more than this to actually negate it. What the Quran is saying is basically simple… this trinity doesn’t exist. This is what the Quran says. It is simply scripture against scripture. People here are trying to say that the Quran defines the trinity . I say the Quran does no such thing. Cause it doesn’t matter … The Quran battled all forms of associating other beings with God … the trinity doctrine is associating Jesus with God as part of God or an image of God or however christians understand it.
Now the Quran can deny the number three all it likes, but thats not an effective argument, and in fact within history is quite novel. Who should the Christian trust? Well according to the quran the Christian should judge by their own gospel which certaintly contradicts the islamic claim.