P
pnewton
Guest
Most pro-abortion choice are born.
True, but so are most pro-lifers.Most pro-abortion choice are born.
This is an hypothetical and you know it…the bodily damage and awesome financial pressure that it is sure to bring.
Sure. But the main question is, again, is the fetus’ right to live greater than a mothers presumed right to not want a baby?Vonsalza:![]()
What you are talking about are privileges. What is actually involved here is the most basic human right of all. Those things are not actually comparable. I think most people recognize the disconnect at presenting the right to live as no more significant than the right to drive. I do think, however, that people had better get used to the idea, because this won’t be the only issue where one’s right to live will be subordinated to someone else’s idea of the common good.Sure. We reserve the right to smoke and die for one’s country to those humans that are 18 years of age or older. Younger persons are barred from this.
Sure. Like when we limit the privilege of driving to those persons 16 and older. This is done, presumably, for public safety. We have rights that those persons younger than 16 do not.
Nothing new here.
Not at all. Last time I looked at the Pew data, most abortions were being done by women in their 30s with other children who felt they could not bear the strain of another mouth to feed.Vonsalza:![]()
This is an hypothetical and you know it…the bodily damage and awesome financial pressure that it is sure to bring.
No. The real issue is whether a woman should be forced to have a child against her will.Of course, the appeal to gender demographics is just a way to avoid having to discuss the actual issue at hand, which is the mass dismemberment of living babies.
The real issue is whether it is okay to murder a baby. Only in a very few cases is it against the woman’s will, since she chose to engage in sex, which has historically been known to result in babies.HopkinsReb:![]()
No. The real issue is whether a woman should be forced to have a child against her will.Of course, the appeal to gender demographics is just a way to avoid having to discuss the actual issue at hand, which is the mass dismemberment of living babies.
If a mother doesn’t want to have a child, she shouldn’t be made to have a child.Vonsalza:![]()
The real issue is whether it is okay to murder a baby.HopkinsReb:![]()
No. The real issue is whether a woman should be forced to have a child against her will.Of course, the appeal to gender demographics is just a way to avoid having to discuss the actual issue at hand, which is the mass dismemberment of living babies.
No she didn’t. She chose to have sex.She’s not being made to. She chose to get pregnant.
It does indeed. About 20% of the time if no precaution is taken (I can cite if you need).Wait, are you actually suggesting that sex does not cause pregnancy?
Wow! Is this arcane, secret knowledge that sex results in pregnancy about 20% of the time?HopkinsReb:![]()
It does indeed. About 20% of the time if no precaution is taken (I can cite if you need).Wait, are you actually suggesting that sex does not cause pregnancy?