L
Lorarose
Guest
Didn’t the people say the same thing when Jesus ate and drank and associated with sinners?
First of all…it isn’t clear from scripture that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute, so let’s give her the benefit of the doubt shall we?And who did Jesus appear to first after He rose from the dead? To one of the eleven or to a former prosititute?
Second of all…there is sin, and there is repentance
There is also just plain 'ole common sense.
Michael Jackson has shown not one whit of repentance.
Even though it was not established in court regarding the alleged abuse (the 2nd or 3rd allegation in a decade) - it WAS established in court he was serving booze to minors (calling it Jesus juice), and exposing young boys to pornography.
The police carted out quite a collection of porn from Neverland.
This is a grown man who admittedly held slumber parties on a regular basis for young boys. He admitted they slept in his bed.
Unfortunately the trial was not about the booze and the porn - and now he’s conveniently out of the country.
Not one word of remorse about the booze and the porn. Not one word about the slumber parties being a bad idea.
And THIS is the guy who is going to work with JPII’s prayers?
You do realize, don’t you? That many priests have been found to seduce young men with booze and porn? It happened at my home parish.
Many priests have put a knife in the heart of the Church because they behaved like this.
I thought the Church was trying to dig itself out from under that mess.
It scares me that someone in Rome thinks it makes sense to consider working with this unrepentant man who prefers the company of young boys. Who gives them liquor, gives them pornography, and invites them to sleep in his bed.
When Paul showed up he was a repentant man willing to suffer for God. Paul admitted his sin and committed himself to the Church.
To compare Michael Jackson to Paul does not compute with me.
It isn’t just about giving people the benefit of the doubt and forgiving them.
It’s about the Church’s ability to take the scandal seriously and correct the problems that led to it in the first place.
For the Church to willingly associate itself with this corruptor of young boys does not breed confidence with me.
If they are looking for a mascot to represent ephebophiliac priests, they couldn’t have made a better choice.