James, Brother of Jesus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oneheartway
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Bible isn’t to be taken 100% literal. Yes some passages are taken 100% but not all. Yet you call use liars because we are Catholic and you are Calvinist which John Calvin was a heretic. You already reject parts of the Bible in which me and Elvisman presented you, but you seem not to care. Ppasa, You are not a Greek scholar. I have looked up Elvismans claims and yes the are true, yours are not Yet you can’t answer one of my questions. Yet you can’t answer one of Elvisman’s questions. You constantly insist were are wrong because we have truth. In case you haven’t heard Catholic means universal and we are the universal Church. Anti-Catholicism isn’t the answer. It is shear ignorance in the fullness of truth. Either provide credible statements that haven’t been already debunked or just leave
 
tobinatorstark said:
The Bible isn’t to be taken 100% literal. Yes some passages are taken 100% but not all. Yet you call use liars because we are Catholic and you are Calvinist which John Calvin was a heretic. You already reject parts of the Bible in which me and Elvisman presented you, but you seem not to care. Ppasa, You are not a Greek scholar. I have looked up Elvismans claims and yes the are true, yours are not Yet you can’t answer one of my questions. Yet you can’t answer one of Elvisman’s questions. You constantly insist were are wrong because we have truth. In case you haven’t heard Catholic means universal and we are the universal Church. Anti-Catholicism isn’t the answer. It is shear ignorance in the fullness of truth. Either provide credible statements that haven’t been already debunked or just leave
Click to expand...
amazing, if the Word of God is not to be 100% literal then who gives you the right to pick and choose what scriptures are true and which ones are not. You know even Christ said do not add or subtract from his Word. You are crazy, I am not a calvinist lol. I dont reject any of God’s Word only mans interpretation which you haven’t answered any of my questions. You haven’t debunked me but what you have done is made yourselves look foolish. The Word of God is my credible statement. You my friend have been find wanting. lol By the Way why debate the Word of God since you don’t know what part is true and which is false. Amazing statement. I hope others see what you have just said
 
tobinatorstark said:
ppasa316;5321183:
I have already debunked you and so did elvisman. We credible proof against your allegations and yet YOU ignored. The Word of God never lies only man. But yes you do lie.
Click to expand...
You haven’t dubunked me lol. you have made yourselves to look foolish. What part of these scriptures does not answer the question whether Jesus had brothers and sisters.
You never answered me about you catholic scholars agreeing that mary was not a perpetual virgin. ANSWER THE QUESTIONS
Click to expand...
 
ppasa316 said:
amazing, if the Word of God is not to be 100% literal then who gives you the right to pick and choose what scriptures are true and which ones are not. You know even Christ said do not add or subtract from his Word. You are crazy, I am not a calvinist lol. I dont reject any of God’s Word only mans interpretation which you haven’t answered any of my questions. You haven’t debunked me but what you have done is made yourselves look foolish. The Word of God is my credible statement. You my friend have been find wanting. lol By the Way why debate the Word of God since you don’t know what part is true and which is false. Amazing statement. I hope others see what you have just said
Click to expand...
YOU TWIST MY WORDS AGAIN, YOU LITTLE LIAR.!!! The Bible is 100% true and you are falsifying my words Catholics don’t pick and chose what is true and not. I have answered your questions. All of them come from the Bible. READ THEM. IF you can’t just leave admit you are false prohesising We have debunked. Why don’t you look what the word means, oh great scholar. I bet you can’t even figure out my signature says. You little punk. I am glad I don’t go trolling to Protestant sites and stir up trouble What don’t you get that we have provided biblical answers from the Bible. If you don’t know what a Bible is then admit you don’t. Who gave MacArthur the right to write his own Bible??? Certainly not God. Why don’t you check out the Douay-Rheims Haydock Bible. That is where my answers come from. Hm. Let me see. That is a Catholic Bible. How smart. I guess I know what the Bible says and it is saying. Never once did I say something in the Bible wasn’t true. YOU can’t prove it. You can’t prove sola scriptura and you can’t disprove Mary’s virginity. I gave you an answer to that. Canticle of Canticles has the answer and so does Luke 1:28. You, don’t believe me. Gees, Hail Mary full of Grace, the Lord is with thee, blessed art thou amongst women. Sounds like she is a prepetual virgin to me.
 
ppasa316 said:
I told you the answer already. v14 is literal brothers whereas 15-16 is talking about the 120 believers. What’s so hard to understand about that or you just don’t want to ackowledge that fact that Mary had other kids. Ludwig Ott a famous Catholic scholar admits that there is no direct reference to Mary’s perpetual virginity in ANY text of scripture. roll your eyes to that one:eek:
Click to expand...
You’ve been debunked, my angry friend.👍

I already showed you that the same word is used in both verses. :rolleyes:
The onus is on YOU to prove otherwise.

Like I said before - spend less time “LOL-ing” and more time studying the Word of God.

Game. Set. Match! 👍
 
elvisman said:
You’ve been debunked, my angry friend.👍

I already showed you that the same word is used in both verses. :rolleyes:
The onus is on YOU to prove otherwise.

Like I said before - spend less time "LOL-ing" and more time studying the Word of God.

Game. Set. Match! 👍
Click to expand...
It’s sad how much angry anti Catholic are. I hope he gets banned
 
ppasa316 said:
tobinatorstark;5321245:
You haven’t dubunked me lol. you have made yourselves to look foolish. What part of these scriptures does not answer the question whether Jesus had brothers and sisters.
You never answered me about you catholic scholars agreeing that mary was not a perpetual virgin. ANSWER THE QUESTIONS
Click to expand...
And YOU never answered me about the Early Church Fathers saying that Mary WAS a perpetual virgin. I asked you waaaaay** back and neither you nor humble could answer.:rolleyes:

So - who’s right - you or the Early Church Fathers?
Click to expand...
 
tobinatorstark said:
YOU TWIST MY WORDS AGAIN, YOU LITTLE LIAR.!!! The Bible is 100% true and you are falsifying my words Catholics don’t pick and chose what is true and not. I have answered your questions. All of them come from the Bible. READ THEM. IF you can’t just leave admit you are false prohesising We have debunked. Why don’t you look what the word means, oh great scholar. I bet you can’t even figure out my signature says. You little punk. I am glad I don’t go trolling to Protestant sites and stir up trouble What don’t you get that we have provided biblical answers from the Bible. If you don’t know what a Bible is then admit you don’t. Who gave MacArthur the right to write his own Bible??? Certainly not God. Why don’t you check out the Douay-Rheims Haydock Bible. That is where my answers come from. Hm. Let me see. That is a Catholic Bible. How smart. I guess I know what the Bible says and it is saying. Never once did I say something in the Bible wasn’t true. YOU can’t prove it. You can’t prove sola scriptura and you can’t disprove Mary’s virginity. I gave you an answer to that. Canticle of Canticles has the answer and so does Luke 1:28. You, don’t believe me. Gees, Hail Mary full of Grace, the Lord is with thee, blessed art thou amongst women. Sounds like she is a prepetual virgin to me.
Click to expand...
Hey thanks for calling me a scholar thats the first and only thing you have gotten right. Refresh my mind and where are those scriptures again that say mary was sinless and she didn’t have any other children. Sounds doesn’t mean that mary was a virgin her whole life. It goes against what the bible says about marriage. boo jah:eek: Bring it on my man.
 
elvisman said:
Yes, it IS sad but we should be above that - and their behavior.
We should just pray for them that someday, God may reveal the truth to them.👍
Click to expand...
hey us protestants are praying for ya’ll too. Thanks for the prayers
 
ppasa316 said:
Hey thanks for calling me a scholar thats the first and only thing you have gotten right. Refresh my mind and where are those scriptures again that say mary was sinless and she didn’t have any other children. Sounds doesn’t mean that mary was a virgin her whole life. It goes against what the bible says about marriage. boo jah:eek: Bring it on my man.
Click to expand...
You are not a scholar. Probably don’t know what one is. I was being sarcastic, but you don’t know what that is either. See post #74. Like I said before you can’t answer one question we present you. You are probably too lazy to reread post 74. How does Mary being a virgin all her life go against the Bible. As said before we gave you all scripture from the Bible and yet you bypassed it and just gave us more passages that lead to what we are saying. Do you get a kick at trolling and harassing Catholics??? I have already reported you for those reasons.
 
elvisman said:
You’ve been debunked, my angry friend.👍

I already showed you that the same word is used in both verses. :rolleyes:
The onus is on YOU to prove otherwise.

Like I said before - spend less time "LOL-ing" and more time studying the Word of God.

Game. Set. Match! 👍
Click to expand...
I am not angry lol. You showed yourself foolish again by calling me a liar and a little punk. Is that what the catholic church teaches. Now who is the angry one. lol Again i offer my services to you because you really are so off base and can’t answer my questions after i gave you plenty of scripture to ponder
 
ppasa316 said:
Hey thanks for calling me a scholar thats the first and only thing you have gotten right. Refresh my mind and where are those scriptures again that say mary was sinless and she didn’t have any other children. Sounds doesn’t mean that mary was a virgin her whole life. It goes against what the bible says about marriage. boo jah:eek: Bring it on my man.
Click to expand...
If you are a scholar then you should be able to tell me what my signature means in English
 
tobinatorstark said:
You are not a scholar. Probably don’t know what one is. I was being sarcastic, but you don’t know what that is either. See post #74. Like I said before you can’t answer one question we present you. You are probably too lazy to reread post 74. How does Mary being a virgin all her life go against the Bible. As said before we gave you all scripture from the Bible and yet you bypassed it and just gave us more passages that lead to what we are saying. Do you get a kick at trolling and harassing Catholics??? I have already reported you for those reasons.
Click to expand...
Answer the questions don’t play around show some class and answer. Well that makes two of us because i reported you yesterday. I don’t think you should be on here. for one you can’t answer and then the dumb remarks you said about the aclu and acorn. shows real class for a catholic
 
ppasa316 said:
I am not angry lol. You showed yourself foolish again by calling me a liar and a little punk. Is that what the catholic church teaches. Now who is the angry one. lol Again i offer my services to you because you really are so off base and can’t answer my questions after i gave you plenty of scripture to ponder
Click to expand...
No you are the one who is lying and 3 other people on this thread can attest to that. I refuse you services and offer my services, cause frankly you are quite an angry person and blaming Catholics for misinterpretation. You said before that you were a Catholic. Why did you leave??? Couldn’t you handle the fullness of truth in which ONLY the Catholic Church has. Keep posting and I will keep reporting you
 
ppasa316 said:
Answer the questions don’t play around show some class and answer. Well that makes two of us because i reported you yesterday. I don’t think you should be on here. for one you can’t answer and then the dumb remarks you said about the aclu and acorn. shows real class for a catholic
Click to expand...
You answer the questions I gave you. You won’t because you are too chicken. Your too chicken to debate with Elvisman head to head
 
tobinatorstark said:
No you are the one who is lying and 3 other people on this thread can attest to that. I refuse you services and offer my services, cause frankly you are quite an angry person and blaming Catholics for misinterpretation. You said before that you were a Catholic. Why did you leave??? Couldn’t you handle the fullness of truth in which ONLY the Catholic Church has. Keep posting and I will keep reporting you
Click to expand...
whos angry lol i am not mad but sad because you do not understand scripture yet you decieve people into believing your lies. Go ahead and report. Double Dog Dare You
 
tobinatorstark said:
You answer the questions I gave you. You won’t because you are too chicken. Your too chicken to debate with Elvisman head to head
Click to expand...
I answered you with scripture what more do you want. You have not answered my questions with scripture. Again where in God’s Word does it say that mary was sinless and had no other children. Please answer with scripture.
 
ppasa316 said:
whos angry lol i am not mad but sad because you do not understand scripture yet you decieve people into believing your lies. Go ahead and report. Double Dog Dare You
Click to expand...
I have reported you 4 times alone on this thread. You slander and lie. You are a heretic for refusing to accept the truth. I gave you scripture and answered your questions. I guess Catholics don’t have scripture?? That is what you are saying. Wrong. We have scripture and I gave the most accurate answer and scripture. You are nothing more than a coward
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top